<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[talk about moral victory. they probably spent way more than $21 million in legal fees.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eraser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eraser <br>haha true.<br><br>So Sony's dual-shock saved Nintendo's @ss.<br>Shouldn't Nintendo thank them one-way or another?<br>If I were Sony I would sue Nintendo if they didn't<br><br>Moral: hit Ctrl-S after each design and have alot of money handy!<br>Its a fish-eat-fish world with patent trolls everywhere, buy Palm!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kangal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eraser <br>No, sir, this is no moral victory.  Overall, Nintendo did spend millions to fight this case but probably well less than $21mil.  The average patent litigation case costs $3-10mil for a case this size.  But the important thing is, this is a REAL victory, for common sense and a victory in the war against patent trolls, which is something we can all cheer about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tonicboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tonicboy  no, the only party that's victorious is patent lawyers, pretty much everybody else loses]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GaryZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kangal  <br>You mean, crtl + Shift + S.....your gonna wanna save ever version you have encase the initial and final versions are completely different, which they will be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@abedinthehouse  <br><br>i think the end moral of the story is you just don't Fuck with Sony. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James DiBernardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kinda ironic considering Sony stole their controller design from the SNES.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elranzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Elranzer  How havent you been banned? You're such a troll]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Extinction]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eraser <br>Nelson: Ha-ha!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emceay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 15th 2010 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, so Sony and Microsoft paid when they were not guilty of patent infringement? Do they get the money back?<br><br>Will this happen every single generation?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ridgecity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ridgecity <br>No they don't get the money back<br>No this won't happen every generation. They may get sued, but all they have to do is point to this case.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ridgecity Only MS settled, Sony appearantly wasn't sued..<br><br>So, actually Sony should sue MS en Nintendo.. hihi...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperDre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SuperDre  <br>Sony wasn't sued because they licensed the patents back in 2004.  So, they paid but proactively.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tonicboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ridgecity: Actually MS should sue Anascape [A] to recoup their funds.  The settlement was essentially compensation for MS breaching a A's patent, a patent which is invalid because the design, for lack of a better word, was created by Sony.  I'm sure that MS's lawyers were watching this case and will hop all over A as soon as legally possible.... pending any appeals that A may bring ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VictorRaikkonen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ridgecity <br>the whole point of patent-trolls is that you can make it cheaper for them to pay you, then fight you in court.<br><br>Its basically corporate blackmail.<br><br>These patent trolls are actually incredibly well-organized businesses usually funded by investor money from large hedge funds, etc.  They go around buying small patents in bulk, from small or bankrupt companies, for peanuts.   Then a group of lawyers go out to try to extort money from companies.<br><br>The US patent system needs to be changed.  Patent trolls are uniquely American.<br><br>In Japan its close to impossible to patent-troll, because there is precedence against it, the case of ADC Tech. vs. NTT.  Basically, you get your patent revoked, if you buy purchase the patent with the sole intention of suing people.<br><br>Its a matter of common sense, in Europe most patent trolls are from American firms (like Infineon vs Rambus), but nowhere near the levels of patent trolls as the US.<br><br>We've been trying to change it.  In 2005, there was the Patent Reform Act, which failed because of patent-troll lobbyists, then there was the Patent Reform Arm of 2007, again lobbyists hired by lawyers shot it down.<br><br>Now wer're trying the Patent Reform Act of 2009, which is dramatically weakened in language. But it still hasn't passed..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Patent trolls really piss me off. I am glad to see that there is still SOME semblance of logic within the US legal system.<br><br>Patents have their place, and I know that they are important to protect intellectual property but it just seems that in recency they are being abused for the pursuit of money rather than protecting an idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JKooL <br><br>The US patent system was created for the sole purpose of ensuring that only the patent holder could make money.  Credit for ideas use copyright.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dante of the Inferno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JKooL The worst bit is that when you have a genuine case of patent infringement, there's absolutely no assistance or automatic protection for the little guy - he has to fight his own legal battles. Just take a look at James Dyson vs Hoover.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good on them. Fucking patent trolls. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChazClout <br><br>An ironic statement coming from someone who supports a company that is doing the same damn thing(your avvy if not clear)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Juan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JebusChrist  I also support HTC and Google & Android with my Nexus One (and HTC Hero prior to that). I also support Microsoft with my many purchased Windows licences. I also support canonical being an Ubuntu user. I also support Nintendo and Sony with the Wii and PS3 respectively.....<br><br>Unfortunately the avatar size limits stop me from putting all of these company logos in. :(<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@angelnilo06 More like Wintendo!<br><br>(OK, that was one bad pun....)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChazClout it wasn't a pun. absolutely no ambiguity there...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eko2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[So Sony can sue Nintendo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chadwick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony should sue Nintendo, then.<br><br>/s]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Coufu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Coufu No, cause they didnt patent it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[simvalue]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Coufu Yea if Sony had the patent then sued... Nintendo could just blast their asses back for the playstation move and break even.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jbreez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jbreez <br>Actually if you'd watched ANY of the videos posted on here you'd know Sony has prior art for the Move dating back to around 2000.<br><br>Also, Sony and Nintendo probably have cross-licensing agreements already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brantyr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony sue Nintendo over controller design??<br><br>Have you ever compared the PlayStation controller to the SNES controller?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elranzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jbreez  Except move operates completely the opposite that Wii does. <br><br>@Elzanatroll: And PS1s controller is nothing like SNES. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Extinction]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, Sony doesn't own that patent either ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fiduce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Prior art doesn't mean  priorly patented.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fiduce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fiduce A patent is really just to protect your 'art' in a legal/financial sense.  However, if you're art is already out in the public sphere, and widely produced for that matter, you don't need to worry about a patent if you aren't trying to make money off of it.  Which obviously wouldn't be the case here.  But anyone who's taken a semester of Intellectual Property knows that these guys would't be able to patent 'art' that was previously produced by someone else.  I'd be like engadget not copyrighting their logo, using it for 5 years, and person X trying to lodge a CR patent after that amount of time.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VictorRaikkonen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm assuming this just invalidates the patent that was held by the troll?  If so, good news!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jpxdude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when is the patent system getting that well-needed overhaul? Anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KupoCheer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KupoCheer 21/12/2012 (UK date format) as far as I am aware]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Brown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 5:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Sony,<br>F##k yeah <br><br>Signed<br>Reggie Fils-Aimé]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[trolll? isn't that kinda bias?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Moburkhardt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually it is not necessarily true that Microsoft gets nothing back.  Though not common, I have seen and drafted settlement agreements which call for a refund on the license/settlement fee if the licensed patent is subsequently invalidated as happened here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is getting out of control eh?? See what I did there?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattsZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Knowing nothing about the case other than a few net postings, it is also not at all clear to me that Anascape is a troll in the classic sense.  I note that the patent was assigned to Anascape prior to issuance, and that, at the time, Anascape and the inventor were both located in Carson, NV.  It is more than possible that Anascape is just a holding company set up by the inventor to hold his own patents.  This is a very common set up.  So, while Anascape may not have been actively making gaming controllers, it may still be linked directly to the inventor and the invention in the patent, which is not what we usually think of as a patent troll.  Trolls buy up patents they had nothing to do with for the sole purpose of litigation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rufus H <br><br>Good point - I think we should all be a bit more careful before making judgments based on the often small about of information that we get about a topic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mogadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why should you be able to patent something like a controller?  I mean I know this gets tossed around every once in a while, but this literally is like patenting a steering wheel on a car.  I mean unless there is something else here I don't understand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ha! Suck it troll! Go Nintendo :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scotopik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony sues Nintendo in 3..2..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SophT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 4:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[No they don't. Sony does not have a patent on that form of controller. As they don't have a patent, they are in no position to sue Nintendo. Read the info on the story before commenting please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orresnei]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 7:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[A horrible day for patent fascism... :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mkhpalm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess none of the big gaming companies profiting from this controller design actually have the patent for this then. <br><br>I wonder which Microsoft controllers were being called on by this patent, Xbox, Xbox 360, or somewhere in their PC line up? (Sidewinder?)<br><br>As far as I see it, the Gamecube controller has a lot less in common with the Sony Playstation DualShock Controller than the Xbox and 360 have in common with the PS DS Controller. Which makes it surprising that Nintendo actually lost whereas Microsoft had it settled...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zer0Kage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/14/nintendo-escapes-patent-troll-in-appeals-court-thanks-to-sony/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if Nintendo will send a fruit basket over to SCEJ.<br><br>Yeah, I didn't think so either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[koehler83]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2010 6:41AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
