http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
/s

(Sorry, I'm a boob)]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Man.... talk about gorgeous modular industrial design.

Jizz in my pants!]]>Apr 15th 2010 3:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 5:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Glad you guys are liking Zac's and my video. RED Day was a total blast...]]>Apr 16th 2010 4:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Ummm, this is a tool one uses to put food on the table and pay their rent. 'Decent' and 'Gadgets' are 100% irrelevant to this conversation.]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/I know but I can imagine some ppl buying it for the heck of it and take everyday pics and such. But true, I would buy it if I was a pro and needed it. other than that, it's a great piece of work!]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
absolutely no one would buy this for the heck of it. you'd only shell out b/c you're seeking pro-quality equipment to do more than normal every-day shooting]]>Apr 15th 2010 2:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 5:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Fail at life? lol that the weakest comment I have read. I have seen people, that I personally know who shell out mad money for high end gadgets and barely put them to use. So til then, you might be the one failing at life because I have the proof of such fools!]]>Apr 15th 2010 6:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
I'm sure some people know - but not all do.

Same as Canon EVIL (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangeable Lense) - I'm sure EPIC on a RED has a meaning... but which?]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/It means "Epic"
I'm sure they named it based on its resolution and the fact that it's the type of camera you might use to shoot an epic motion picture. ]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/OK I can answer myself from video two - its the camera's name.]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Thanks for the reply :)]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
http://hphotos-sjc1.fbcdn.net/hs465.snc3/25532_1317957349123_1236420567_30977940_1972703_n.jpg

My DVX100B screen is so cluttered with info...]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/I agree. I think in the case of the DVX however, the screen is so small to begin with. ]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
True... but that camera design started back in what... 2002?

Only recently have cameras been getting 4.3" LCDs... but they are ~$8000.

And if you've got that much money to spend, and big projects... you've probably got an external monitor anyway.]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/twss]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 3:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
This is exactly why we don't get giveaways like this. -1000 Internets!]]>Apr 15th 2010 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Hey, I'm Zac, the one that shot and uploaded these all, I was rushing to get these onto Reduser and really didn't have time to color correct, or reset the white balance, cause they were playing with the lights every other time.

Sorry about that, I am recoloring them as we speak.]]>Apr 15th 2010 8:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 9:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/No worries, I only made an account to reply to the guys down below us complaining about audio. :D

Glad you liked them

Zac]]>Apr 15th 2010 9:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Red cameras are seriously for professionals -- of course they are expensive, lol...they are also of superb quality as well though.]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
If you have to ask...]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
EPIC Body - $28,000
RED Side CF module - $500
RED Side handle - $750
Redmote - $550
5" LCD Touchscreen - $1,600

Not sure about the lens on that thing but I think it's a new RED 17-50mm T2.9 zoom - $6,000.

Altogether that's $37,400]]>Apr 16th 2010 4:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/wow, $1600 for 5" LCD Touchscreen? And we nerds complain about iPad / HP slate pricing...]]>Apr 16th 2010 4:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://hphotos-sjc1.fbcdn.net/hs045.snc3/13313_1338834763832_1620030223_812023_8385886_n.jpg]]>Apr 16th 2010 4:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
13.5 stops dr in latest testing]]>Apr 15th 2010 2:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
If that's what RED is claiming I guess it's really about 9 (since when RED measured their previous one they claimed 11.5 but it was really about 8).
]]>Apr 15th 2010 2:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Considering modern Canon DSLRs without a raw codec can shoot 10-11 stops I imagine this can at least match them. ]]>Apr 15th 2010 11:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 16th 2010 4:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/]]>Apr 15th 2010 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 2:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 2:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Talk about hurting your credibility.]]>Apr 15th 2010 7:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
Hey Guys, we were shooting on a steadicam pilot for every other interview, so we needed something wireless, if you go to any of our other interviews over on www.vimeo.com/landmine, you can see all the other videos, audio is perfect, no problems. We had done a sound check right before we shot, headphones for testing (don't you worry) but the operator took them off because the cord kept getting caught in the arm of the steadicam. And for some reason after that the audio got major interference.


WE had no plans of posting the video, but the Reduser, SCarletuser, and even Ted gave us a call to post it, amid the audio problems, because they all wanted the information out. So if you didn't like the audio, apparently what he was saying wasn't that important to you.


Zac]]>Apr 15th 2010 8:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Apr 15th 2010 3:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/Whoops, never mind. He said Zac was unimportant :-P]]>Apr 15th 2010 3:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/15/working-red-epic-camera-demonstrated-at-nab-2010/
"Specifications, prices and delivery dates are subject to change. Count on it.
We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone with a bad attitude."]]>Apr 15th 2010 3:08PM