http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Love that Elitebook style design on this.

and that handles pretty cool....not practical (in my opinion) but cool non-the-less.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/It's not really that thick considering it is made to be durable.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Reactions. http://bit.ly/hp-mini-5102-reactions]]>Apr 19th 2010 6:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
They are appreciated, thanks!]]>Apr 16th 2010 10:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
The best reviewer on Engadget IMO, Joanna is amazing and I look forward to her reviews. ]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
+1
]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 12:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Agreed.

Although, the touch version could easily have been a tablet.]]>Apr 16th 2010 1:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Agreed.

Although, the touch version could easily have been a tablet.]]>Apr 16th 2010 1:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 10:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
I've often thought the build quality of the HP was far superior to the others machines out there. I mean the EEE range from ASUS has nothing on the HP's but if they don't last 6 months due to internal failures whats the point.

]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
IDK about that. We've had an HP laptop and netbook in the house, and with both of them, the build quality was lacking. My mom has since upgraded her HP 10 inch netbook to an Asus 12 inch, and the difference in build quality is like night and day.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Color me impressed that you bought a sixth HP mini after your fifth one failed :-)]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 12:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
he said sold, not bought...]]>Apr 16th 2010 1:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
amazon search windows 7 netbooks, they start at $278. pretty reasonable.

]]>Apr 16th 2010 2:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/I'd want to see that Elitebook 2740p tablet reviewed.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Will do. Thanks for your hard work Joanna.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/destroys in style? As in, that ridiculous handle? ]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
''Netbooks are 'not' dead.''

and stop causing mobile havoc]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Because Steve Jobs thinks netbooks are bad?]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Or because I can watch a 720p video on ipad with no stuttering, apparently this netbook can't even manage that. And if you are going up to $700 bux, why not get a laptop as the ipad haters would say.]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Doesn't the iPad only do 576p?]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
All of these choices are finally starting to excite me.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Weight, heat, portability...why do people spend 700 on a laptop when you could get a higher spec'd desktop for that price...silly question.]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
After using an Acer with an 11.6 1366x768, it really makes the 10.1 seem as small as it is.

Can it really be that much more expensive to make 11.6 screens over 10.1?]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Bigger screen means bigger device. Its not rocket science. ]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Not really actually. An 11.6 screen would fit on this HP mini for sure. My dad has the acer 11.6 and I have a 10.1 and the difference is negligible maybe .5 in wider at most. Also, his has a fullsize (or near to) keyboard and its actually thinner than mine.


]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
I don't understand why companies are hesitant to make devices like this convertible. It can't cost that much more money. Touchscreen on just a laptop is pretty worthless. Being able to turn it into a tablet = win.]]>Apr 16th 2010 11:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
I was simply saying this HP isn't the superstar in the field.]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 5:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/Apr 16th 2010 11:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
Perfect when in bed or at a friends house, at work or traveling by car, bus, train,

Plus screen size it much better than using a standard 3.5 inch phone/PDA/MID screen for watching video, espceially if you get a netbook with a 768p screen, 1024x600 is ok, but 1366x768 is sharper and better than a lot of larger screen with the same resolution.

I use mine more for watching video than i use my 20in 900p HD screen for watching video,]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/16/hp-mini-5102-review/
What model netbook do you have?]]>Apr 16th 2010 12:14PM