<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[man, I would not want to see ARM being hostile takeover like this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingofwale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale I agree, I had to look at Samsungs cash position seeing as how they want to be the #1 chip manufacturer in the world.  They have a mere 7 billion, which is plenty more than ARMs mkt cap of just under 2 billion.  That said, Apple has this money to just splash around, but a Samsung acquisition is much better for the industry than an Apple acquisition given their respective business practices.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale <br>theres no mention of it being a hostile takeover<br>although if Apple does acquire ARM then there will be huge void left to fill]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ushpiy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ushpiy  <br><br>Yeah, I don't really see it as "hostile". As long as the consumers benefit though, yay]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sj.lee36bc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Outsider  <br><br>I shoudl clarify, I'm not implying takeover will be benefitting consumers (probably won't). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sj.lee36bc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale ooof, just saw from the source that the bid, if made, might be above 5B pounds.  <br><br>@ushpiy, you'll notice that the financial industry stopped using the term "hostile" in the 80's for the most part.  This is for more than one reason, as companies now see a strength in cooperation and a value of money over pride (neither of which are bad things), a knowledge that it isn't worth the fight, amongst other reasons.  If you read the comment as "takeover", "merger", and/or "absorbed" and omit "hostile" kingofwolfe's point is just as valid.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  Kraft's buyout of Cadburys, sure started off fairly hostile.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[grouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale It appears Apple learned nothing from Microsoft's legal problems in the 2000s; depending on who's in the White House, the US can be somewhat unhappy about abusive monopolies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale<br><br>It's ok. If there is a God he will not let this happen. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HawtDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CRA1G  Obama has to be worried about being called a socialist, especially if this happens before the next election, and the Republican's are in the pockets of multinationals.  It's a lose-lose in a lot of ways.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale Me neither... I just hope that this is blocked somehow by the industry. IMO, a bunch of industry players need to come together in some consortium and make a counter bid  or something...<br><br>Oh an that little animation: doesn't is look like its moving between "cards"? lol...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brokensticks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CRA1G  And Samsung would not be a monopoly.<br><br>FOr your information, Samsung also makes phones and other products that can use the processors. Potentially, Samsung has even more products that can use ARM processors.<br><br>So be careful when you throw out Apple and monopoly crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SCXFAN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[All in favor to transfer to MIPS say I]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CamronCake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  <br><br>Its also important to note that market cap is just a part of the valuation of an acquisition. You have to take into account this value in multiples. In the current market condition this would equate to 5 times multiples, meaning an ARM acquisition would be valued between 8 - 10 Billion, more than Samsung's cash at hand. Apple has, as of Tuesday's earnings call, $41.5 Billion in cash reserves. They could buy ARM for $8 Billion in cash (20% of their cash reserve) and not even feel it. Competitors would be shook!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacArtStyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale <br><br>"blame it on the vodka, blame it on the henny<br>blamd it on the bottom line, got you feeling dizzy<br>blame it on the g-g-g-google...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rdrunner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HawtDawg  So its okay for Google to go around and gobble up shit and not Apple?<br><br>Okay.<br><br>Oh, Ddidn't Google buy some company made up of Former Apple and PA Semi people.<br><br>But oh, thats okay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SCXFAN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MacArtStyle  <br><br>actually  apple only has  31b  in case<br><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL&fstype=ii" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:AAPL&fstype=ii</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  .. WTF are you talking about ?<br><br>(a) ARM is a UK company so it is up to the UK government to decide whether to allow this to go through and (b) mergers particularly of this size are irrelevant to most people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SCXFAN Yeah, but Google buying that company won't result in a near-monopoly over mobile microchips.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@derp  <br><br>You sound like a total fanboi with no objectivity. Technologies like these which are vital to every electronic gadget out there are best when independent. Once it's taken over by another consumer products company, it is bound to be influenced by business politics and innovation takes the back seat. Google/Apple doesn't matter. It'll be the same result no matter which other big company gobbles it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SCXFAN<br><br>When did I say anything about Google? I wouldn't want them to buy ARM either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HawtDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  I checked on Google finance before, you their cash on hand is as of end of 2009, not current information<br><br>@taligent, if you think the US DOJ cares where a company comes from then WTF are you talking abut?  Firstly, I was responding to a comment, not something I brought up myself.  Second, if the UK does allow this, it still has to go thru the US.....um...duh.    ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  That information is old and inaccurate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  .. Actually it has 33 billion in more liquid assets and another 15 billion in longer term investments.<br><br>It only needs about 8 to buy ARM.<br><br>Not to mention those results are from last year so we have an extra 4 months worth of profits that aren't shown.<br><br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MacArtStyle  Other things can play into a purchase though, it's hard to find the liabilities Samsung has, but if they can afford to take a loan to make a purchase, then why not?  Also, stock issuances can be made.   All that said, yes, Apple can afford more than Samsung. The London Standard thought a bid from Apple would come in at the lower end of what you say (which I previously posted elsewhere) at about 5.2B pounds ($8B).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@derp  So them buying that large mobile advertising company won't make them a monopoly in internet advertising?<br><br>Okay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SCXFAN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale Animation swipe looks cool. Can't wait for the new OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  .. Can you please clearly articulate how the US DOJ has jurisdiction over a UK based company ?<br><br>Because a very similar situation happened with the GE/Honeywell merger which the US approved and the EU rejected.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@taligent  They don't have jurisdiction over ARM, not at all.  But there would be joint jurisdiction to approve any merger, right?<br><br>"Because a very similar situation happened with the GE/Honeywell merger which the US approved and the EU rejected."<br><br>This case is my exactly my point, but in the reverse.  That said, this is the US and the UK which support big business more than any two countries.  So, if proposed, I wouldn't necessarily hold my breathe waiting for a rejection.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@taligent  UK would actually be the regulating authority here from that side of the pond, right? I don't think it's the EU, but I could definitely be wrong there.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale Ah, I get it. Soon there will be Apple Search, Apple Mail, Apple Calendar, Apple Video, Apple Maps....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[So Samsung would be a better buyer than Apple because of their "respective" business practices? You must have been asleep for the whole LCD "price-fixing" fiasco.<br><br>Calling Apple a monopoly, goes to show you do not know what a monopoly really is. Apple creates a closed platform - you know, like Nintendo, Sony, Dyson, etc. That does not make them a monopoly.<br><br>This would be very beneficial to Apple product users.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trainwrecka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale This is is all a plot of monopoly of the market. What about the free cloud computing? Just like the banning of Flash, this speculation of controlling ARM powered smartphone (by acquiring it) is a yet another form of monopolization. Reactions - <a href="http://bit.ly/4-0-OS-iPhone-reactions" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4-0-OS-iPhone-reactions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[merrialolan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 10:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale <br><br>ARM was started as a joint venture by Apple and Acorn. Apple had to sell their stake back when they were struggling to stay afloat.<br><br>So it seems unlikely this is a hostile takeover. More like a family reunion.<br><br>Just for those who were unaware unlike folks like Google, Apple has had a direct hand in many technologies we see today :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaffreywali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale <br><br>Apple started ARM in the 90s, in conjunction with their Newton product.  They sold their stake in ARM after they cancelled the Newton.<br><br>So all this means is that ARM would be coming back into the Apple family, where it belongs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  Come on man Samsung is the worst company I do not want to give them any business at all after my experience with THE POOREST QUALITY products I ever bought. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Outsider  <br><br>you really think consumers will benefit from this?! there is seriously NO way any consumers will benefit from this. It will simply prevent other companies from acquiring chips from ARM.<br><br>The only benefit will be for apple since it'll bring their own costs down, cutting out the profit that arm makes and getting chips at cost... but if you think for one second they're going to pass those savings on to you, you're insane.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Kapoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Outsider  <br><br>and now i read your second post... great job engadget, not letting me delete or alter my previous comment to say I "agree"...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Kapoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kyphem  I think you are looking at their products rather than their subcomponents.  Screen on the iPad - Samsung.  Flash memory - Samsung.  This list within the top quality products from Apple goes on and outside them too.  <br><br>End of the day?  Trust me, you want the hummingbird in your next smartphone.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jaffreywali  <br><br>I cant believe this uninformed crap is highly ranked. Quit spewing this garbage to make this stupid rumor acceptable in your fanboy eyes.<br><br>Apple and VLSI infused cash into ARM to get development on the ARM6 for their products. Apple then sold all the stock after ARM did what they wanted and was able to function on their own.<br><br>By your stupid logic, then many of these corporations belong to another. Look MS bought out Apple stock to help them out when they were nothing. Apple owes MS big time right?<br><br>What a joke.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KB24 is Trash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH YEAH AND THIS RUMOR IS HOGWASH:<br><br><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362956,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362956,00.asp</a><br><br>Thankfully, the CEO of ARM has some common sense.<br><br>I hope whoever started this rumor enjoys whatever stock price manipulation they were going for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KB24 is Trash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CRA1G  It's not a monopoly. Its vertical integration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ErrorBorn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@brokensticks  Qualcomm could do it on their own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roark123]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo  ARM Holdings does not fab chips btw.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clayton.coffman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 2:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingofwale The multitasking is not what we expected, but its still great! The customization of the folders and changing of wallpaper background (working mode) is a bonus.<br><br>The iAd is also impressive, if you're a developer. That 60/40 deal (you got the 60 share). Is pretty sweet, compare to other adnetwork today. Reactions--- <a href="http://j.mp/os-4-0-by-iphone" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/os-4-0-by-iphone</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[merrialolan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was reading just over a week ago that they wanted to move just about everything Samsung was doing for them, with the exception of NAND, in-house.  I guess this will just strengthen their abilities in that department.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez Man, as much as I like Apple, I prefer them sticking to their market share, thus being an option for the customer. If they start to dominate the environment I'll get worried.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Atkins  I have no problem with them expanding their market, I actually want to see them do that.  But I want to see them grow organically, where they make developments and innovations; where they succeed they may help the maturation of a product market, where they fail they do not affect the product market negatively as a whole.  <br><br>Where they expand by a merger, in the manner they do in this article, where they can succeed and hurt the market, and fail and hurt the market....well, that just sucks.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple buying ARM would be scary for the phone industry IMHO.  Talk about hamstringing your competition and halting the great progress we've seen in the smartphone industry in the last 2 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeoreDX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apple-rumor-roundup-intrinsity-behind-the-a4-arm-being-eyed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DeoreDX <br><br>Apple loves hindering the progress of the market if it means they can come up with more ways to troll patents and let loose their legions of lawsuits and their effective attempts at stifling competition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 7:29AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
