<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tis the roundup]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolaaron88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix to be jolly.<br><br>Gotta say, that front-facing cam will be a neat addition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br>Yup, video chat never caught on because you had to have the 1 phone that supported it on the carrier, and then the other person had to be on the same carrier AND have the same phone, but now that Apple has invented a standard (having the same phone) video calling should take off.<br><br>heck some carriers still cannot even get inter-carrier text messaging to work ,.,, All I know is that Carriers are going to be bending over backwards for Apple to get iPhone 4G stock to cash in on these premeium video call minutes at $0.25 instead of $0.10 eper minute]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, MSN emoticon sad face.  Haven't seen that for ages]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[month]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@month  <br><br>I thought Gizmodo did the fair share for all other websites/news channels combined all over the world, no?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>let's be honest, we really don't know much. they could still totally change it up, but that super high-res, medium sized display is going to be SHARP. At the end of the day though, its a phone on AT&T, ouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stathakis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>for all we know this could have been a totally intentional leak. its not Apple-like, but with all these cool phones coming out soon, Apple might have wanted to steal their thunder with this "leak".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[warningabc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br><br>Wouldn't a 'standard' mean it's open to everyone? Isn't this the argument Apple fanboys use against Flash?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. 32X [RIP Halo 2!]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br><br>Here's some things no one knows for sure.<br><br>*Expandable memory?<br>*Applications still only available on App Store?<br>*Flash?<br>*Customizable OS GUI?<br>*avi? mkv? xvid? Anything other than H.264-encoded  m4v/mp4/mov?<br><br>Man, if the iPhone gets these, it'll be a real killer!<br><br>/hate]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>Someone please take us all to end of june already.. can't keep seeing the same thing posted over and over again..<br>On second thought, take us to holiday season '10, want to look at windows 7 devices too before I buy this and write my next 2 years to at&t.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank Hold on a minute, that's not good logic. That's almost like saying front-facing cams will take off because the EVO has it, and lots of people want the EVO.<br><br>Mind you, ff-cams have been around since 2005, and many Euro networks had the capacity to support it since '06. They weren't limited by carrier either. If 2 people had any phone with a front-facing camera, they could talk to each other regardless of what network they were on.<br><br>I think you should rephrase it to "Apple will popularize video calling in the US"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>basically they added nothing new.  game center? some poor crap copy of xbox live?<br><br>folders? so a grid of icons inside a grid of icons? must have taken years of research to develop this<br><br>windows phone 7 will kill this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OSXsucks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br>Yes but FF camera on an iPhone will be much simpler...<br><br>instead of call it will be video call icon...<br><br>The people that will actually use video calls will now be able to since they allready have the hardware... not the NERDS and DWEEBS that go out and bought a $600 cell phone back in 2006]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br>You are ignorant to believe that they are adding a front facing camera for video calls.  Chances are that it's for self photos and video blogging.  All I can say is that IF they do add video calls and they are still on AT&T I'm definitely jumping ship.  The network already is shit I can't imagine them throwing video into the mix.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gizmodo should've sent the phone to Geohot when they had the chance..... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Strangelove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  We really have no idea what it will look like. Little early to speculate, don't you think?<br><br>"The people that will actually use video calls will now be able to since they allready have the hardware... not the NERDS and DWEEBS that go out and bought a $600 cell phone back in 2006"<br><br>This confuses me. The name-calling didn't help either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br><br>only nerds like us actually went out and got a video chat enabled phone back in those days...<br><br>who do you think reads these electronics blogs?<br><br>Anyway the cat is out of the bag this is it the iPhone 4G, Apple is not going to change this thing so close to production...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  So, "When Apple releases it, it'll be targeted at normal people?" is what you're saying?<br><br>0o...trust me I'm just trying to get a feel on what you're saying here. I just need a little clarification. ^^]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dfreeindy  No need to be calling people ignorant -- especially when you're the person in the room that things they're going to add a front-facing camera and then NOT have a video chat feature.  Just sayin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RidleyGriff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi guys. How are you all liking being downranked into oblivion? Enjoy it, or stop commenting. Your choice!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darbear5610]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[What we know: Engadget will post everything from specs to amp draw from the battery]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix It would be great if the new iPhone will have faster processor, sharper display, higher capacity storage, augmented cam and perhaps a removable battery -- Although some sources suggest that 2 iphone will<br>be released this year - (could be the HD) Reactions-* <a href="http://bit.ly/fourth-gen-apple-impressions" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/fourth-gen-apple-impressions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mylenerohane]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RidleyGriff  The thing about a video chat feature is that its moronic.  Its basically a gimmick.  People may use it one time and then never do it again.  Also, the person you call would have to have a compatible device, which consists of 0% of the cell phone market now.  So it would be a feature that can only be used between iPhone 4g phones.  Its a waste to include it in a phone, although its alternative features are much more useful than the primary feature.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Drago<br>You are the star in the middle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uShak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@warningabc  And cost them a lot of 3G/3GS sales.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oghowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>Is there some kind of downrank-fest going on that I was not informed of?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AaronW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@muyoso  Ever heard of a little service called Skype? I use it all the time to have my kids videochat with their grandparents. This video chat on the iPhone needs to be IP based and not metered like an actual phone call.  Just. like. on. the. pc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geezer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 6:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br>So do you guys think its using the Apple A4 SoC? It would make sense, the more you make of a product the less each individual unit costs. Not like they have anywhere else to go, the 3GS had a ~600MHz Cortex A8 and the A4 SoC uses a 1000MHz Cortex A8. Seems like a no-brainer upgrade. My best guess would be that it has as much RAM as the iPad as well (256MB), which is half as much as a Nexus One, HD2, Evo 4G, Pre Plus, etc. <br><br><br>But thats the hardware enthusiast in me talking, fixated on specs as usual :-P<br><br>Err, it looks...Pretty? Miniature iPad, with brick-like stature, I get it. But I was still surprised when Gizmodo got it, its quite different from the curvy iPhones past. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@muyoso  I don't think it'll be a waste. It just depends on your lifestyle. I have professors that travel often so we set up iChat video chats on our Macs and hold discussions. Imagine if a iPhone HD (on Wi-Fi or LTE *crosses fingers*) were to connect to iChat on a Mac (which I don't see why they can't) and my professors could hold a quick on location film set demonstration if he's working on a film that we can't be at. Business people can certainly use this, though it does seem less formal than current solutions. And if software developers are given the API's to access the FF camera, they can put it in 3rd party messengers and be cross-platform compatible with Android/WebOS/WP7 etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG, nobody here has thought of it yet.<br><br>**********************<br> iChatRoullete<br>**********************<br><br>Boom! Just blew your minds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiptup300]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 9:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br>I figured the iPhone's version of iChat (presuming that's what it ends up being, right, because nothing's "official" yet) would work like on the Mac.<br><br>I haven't played with a Mac too much, but I've seen them in action. I figure it'd be less video conference phone calls and more like cam chatting, the same way you'd do on AIM/MSN/other, with other people, regardless of whether or not they're on their phones or not (you'd have the proper credentials and stuff and logged in, and you can cam chat with your AIM/MSN/Yahoo/etc people via your phone.<br><br>Or iChatRoulette, a la Tiptup300?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  <br><br>Ok so they don't know if the hole on the side is for popping the MicroSIM card slot or a noise cancelling microphone? How about sticking a paper clip and finding out? ahhh Gizmodo...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beckhams777]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@beckhams777  the one on the side is definitely for the sim. It's the one on the top they were referring to. Gizmodo seemed fairly certain that it was a mic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br><br>They didn't answer the most important question...Will it blend?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zwaag]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlienSix <br><br>Does anyone know where I can get an iPhone 3g case that resembles the case apple used to disguise the iPhone 4 as a 3gs?<br><br>Basiclly, a slim fit, black case, hard, shiny black like the color of the back of the iPhone, and covers the chrome rim<br><br>I can't seem to find any like this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[deprav3d]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Stathakis  Well the man who stole the iphone is now caught. <a href="http://j.mp/iphone-stealer-impressions" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/iphone-stealer-impressions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[merialeshk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 12th 2010 5:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heard the screen on the iPhone 4 is actually a little smaller than the 3GS's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Programmer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Programmer I really think they named the chip the A4 bc its going in the fourth gen. iPhone. Hence the name iPhone A4. Makes perfect sense to me. *Runs to trademark*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HyteProsector]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Programmer<br>why don't you read the article before commenting? i can't stand when people do that. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stathakis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HyteProsector  <br>My Audi A4 does not like this... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dfreeindy  Thats actually the car I drive. 2002 3.0. But I still doubt trademark infringement. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HyteProsector]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dfreeindy  <br><br>MY 87 Buick GN does not like your wimpy Nazi Audi A4<br><br>what is your point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HyteProsector<br>2004 A4 3.0 Quattro<br><br>@AppleDrank<br>If we were in a drag you would definitely win.  Introduce any corners and my little "Nazi" car would annihilate you.  Until you drive an Audi you have no idea what a perfect machine it is and how amazing they are to drive.  Back in 87 we knew how to build cars here in the US...  they had no style but you could rely on them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dfreeindy  <br><br>No style?<br><br>says the guy driving a car loaded with traction control...<br><br>REAL men drive cars without airbags and brake assist crap...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dfreeindy  <br><br>"If we were in a drag you would definitely win."<br><br>i read this as:<br><br>If we were in drag, you would definitely win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[logicbomb.de]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveyAyo u don't know how much joy you've brought me  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crack it]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br><br>"MY 87 Buick GN does not like your wimpy Nazi Audi A4"<br><br>Audi was re-appropriated through no fault of their own by the nazi party. During that time they were a military factory, not a standard auto maker.<br><br>If you want a Nazi mobile, see: Mercedes, Volkswagon. Most of them at the time either had no choice, shut down and fire everyone, or simply stay open and make a profit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stratus41298]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 23rd 2010 12:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is what i know about it... it makes me want and EVO 4g or Lightning that much more, Apple clearly cant keep up with real innovation]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveyAyo <br><br>As far as touchscreen phones go, the hardware provides very little cues about innovation. They're essentially blank slates made interesting by the software it's running. Without a final build of OS 4.0, how can you definitely conclude that it's not innovative enough?<br><br>But you're definitely right: EVO 4G = PIMP]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Apple's next iPhone: what we know (and what we don't)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/22/apples-next-iphone-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveyAyo <br>I like my iphone 3gs.  Good phone.  I'm sure my wife will like the phone when I give it to her, and get a Dell.  <br>Sorry Apple, no screen over 4" and no flash?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bevo4138]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2010 4:33PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
