<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bla, bla, bla.<br><br>Resistive = fail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Advanced Kind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br><br>oh gosh this crap again?<br><br>Resistive when done properly can be waaay better than Capacitive...<br><br>Stupid Apple touting Capacitive multitouch crap that no one really uses.<br><br>Analogy; Carb 4 barrel V8 can beat the crap out of that junk they put in a 2010 camaro/challenger/mustang]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  I have yet to use a resistive screen I liked more than a capacitive for touch.<br><br>But where I really think that many PC makers fail is the screen quality. The fact that Apple uses IPS screens makes a world of a difference to me.<br><br>On the desktop, I tend to use a PC over my Mac. But I have IPS screens. On the laptop front, well, PCs rule my life now there currently and crappy screens knock a lot of laptops out of the running.<br><br>Then in the netbook world. Well, crappy screens are a given. And now everyone is on the tablet bandwagon where there is even more focus on the screen. It seems that it would be a no brainer to use a high quality screen and make your bezel look as good as possible - as that's all you got really.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br><br>please explain to me the "that no one really uses" bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[2mnyshp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind Having a touch-screen notebook with out stylus support for more important things like OneNote = FAIL<br><br>Seriously, I wish people would stop whining about things they clearly don't understand.  I'll gladly give up a capacitive interface for OneNote compatibility.  Its either resistive or active digitizer if you want to be productive, and capacitive if you want to finger paint and watch movies all day from your couch.  Fat lazy bastards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br><br>Asus fails are rare, but they happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dreamerkm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luxury Guy  So it seems obvious that the answer is a capacitive touch layer ith active digitizer that overrides capacitive when in use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xeno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br><br>No it's not. I own a convertable mini notebook and capacitive is the way to go. You basically use the touchscreen as a replacement for the mouse or touchpad. With a stylus, you simply get pixel perfect precision and you can still tap an icon using your fingers if you want to. Personally, I don't like glossy screens with greasy fingerprints all over them and a dumbed down GUI with all elements increased in size.<br> <br>About 99% of my time, I simply use the mouse to click. No dragging, gestures or other useless things I can easily do with a keyboard shortcut. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Murfo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br><br>Haha, you have to be kidding.  I'm just going to bite on your engine comment.<br><br>You do know that the 2010 engines are lighter, more powerful (stock), more fuel efficient, more responsive, and more reliable, right?<br><br>Yes, there's a charm to the old engines and tuning your own carburetor, but from a performance perspective the 2010 models are light years ahead of the old technology.<br><br>Sorry to take that off track :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ebgolfin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br><br>Yup Failed indeed, nothing to see here, move along. <br>Ipad beat this model so far. Let's see how other tablet fare against them.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1mc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br>The limitations of the iPad may be pretty terrible, but if things like this are the only competition, the iPad is still the best choice. Of course, tablets are kind of pointless anyway, the form factor just isn't any good. Lots of propping up and straining neck for not a lot of advantage over a laptop. And a netvertible? Why? What is the purpose?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bailey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luxury Guy  <br><br>They make stylus' for capacitive screens and your whole post ONLY revolves around someone who is ONLY productive by handwriting, there are many of us who can be productive without the need to write.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TWiz  Win 7 is great, for sure it'll suit this swivel laptop perfectly. One of my concerns here are the battery issues too, hopefully it will be addressed. Viewed.. <a href="http://bit.ly/asus-3e-series-swivel" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/asus-3e-series-swivel</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[morkelian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Advanced Kind <br><br>More importantly it has a keyboard so fuck the touchscreen altogether.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 8:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is why you use an ACTIVE DIGITIZER. Touchscreens are great, but no passive digitizer can even compare to an active digitizer when it comes to things like hand writing or drawing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@M3 I said the same things when the iPad came out and everybody was claiming that Windows 7 would crush it when the (insert upcoming Win 7 based tablet here) came out. <br><br>Until windows designs the UI and input for touch and not simply pen based they are going to fail over and over and over. While Steve Jobs can be an arrogant ass sometimes he was right that people don't want to use a stylus, you lose them and then your screwed. <br><br>I mean we are talking about people who can't remember an 8 character password or freak out when you try to make them choose one.<br><br>Most people will not lose their finger, unless they wrap their iPad bag around it (which I don't recommend). <br><br>Good Job MS, just ignore the most popular input method since the mouse when designing your last OS, I mean it's not like people want that or anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ttringle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@M3 Doh, my mistake M3 clicked the wrong post. <br><br>Hey Engadget when the hell are we going to be able to remove our old posts. huh?<br><br>We were able to do that on Commodore 64's in the 80's for jebussakes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ttringle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ttringle  actually I want both, I want to have a good multitouch for audio apps and some games, browsing and such, but I really want a stylus for things like photoshop/painter. I don't see either as better- they both have very strong points]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@whormongr  At this point are there any apps that you would want to control using a capacitive touchscreen on a PC?  Short answer: No.  <br><br>Are there any apps that you would want stylus support on a PC? Short answer: Yes, painting applications, MS OneNote]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ttringle  Windows 7's Touch UI is actually really nice.  Especially on a capacitive screen.  Have you tried it?  Here's a video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBtEhQqS1dw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBtEhQqS1dw</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ttringle  Not really. When the interface used fully exploits the use of stylus in combination with touchscreen it rocks ( the videos showing the courier show how such an interface should be designed ) . The "touch interface " isn't mandatory at all , some folks -including engadget editors it seems - just want us to think all other forms of an interface are crap by default.<br><br> Also , we know already windows 7 will see updates making better use of touchscreen technology - service pack 1 maybe ?  - so to simply state the OS is unsuitable this early on is a bit premature.Mind you, I think a mobile OS is better suited for tablets ( Android,windows phone 7 ) or Linux .<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rik66]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rik66 Are you suggesting people to buy this, because it ''might'' ''potentially'' get a ''better'' ''touch-oriented'' OS in the ''future''? We are talking about electronics for christ sake, it's not like investing in a house. These things gets cheaper by the minute. If I'm buying some electronics, it better do what I want it to do RIGHT now and not ''potentially'' in the ''future''. Because by then, this thing is worht 10% of what I paid for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luxury Guy  Actually there is ONE program: Amazon's Kindle Application for the PC.  Apparently works quite well with touch.  But that's about it really...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 28th 2010 1:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[DAMMIT!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@seanGadget <br><br>Yep, the wait continues.<br><br>Nice review again, Joanna. Another lackluster device, Joanna. *frown*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phobic99]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sorry, but the first thing I thought of when I saw this is that I really want to see a desktop/laptop level touch OS from Microsoft. If there's one thing that touchscreen portables are missing, it's on the software side of things. PC makers all have their own proprietary way of dealing with things, and none of it ever fits in with the OS aesthetics or works as well as it should.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KupoCheer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KupoCheer Doh! replied to the wrong post originally.<br><br>I said the same things when the iPad came out and everybody was claiming that Windows 7 would crush it when the (insert upcoming Win 7 based tablet here) came out.<br><br>Until windows designs the UI and input for touch and not simply pen based they are going to fail over and over and over. While Steve Jobs can be an arrogant ass sometimes he was right that people don't want to use a stylus, you lose them and then your screwed.<br><br>I mean we are talking about people who can't remember an 8 character password or freak out when you try to make them choose one.<br><br>Most people will not lose their finger, unless they wrap their iPad bag around it (which I don't recommend).<br><br>Good Job MS, just ignore the most popular input method since the mouse when designing your last OS, I mean it's not like people want that or anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ttringle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KupoCheer <br><br>The first thing I thought was, Joanna is hot.  lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kennyb123]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KennyB123 <br>she's quite attractive for a tech journalist in contrast to Foley.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eee-k]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zevobh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[eee pc's new name change]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zevobh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish that ASUS would take more time to get things perfect rather than rush out devices with product-breaking problems.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Sandri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[classic case of a marketing team, price points, need to make something for certain market, engineers tell us we got these options, let's re-spec this to hit this price point....<br><br>... company organisation and upper marketing management failure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[buoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heh, Netvertbile...I'm liking these names]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[216]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone left the stove on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't figure what users they are targeting with this device?<br>A touch screen for what?<br><br>I would rather put 500$ in a very good non-touchscreen netbook.<br><br>(BTW, I would not use Windows on my netbook except for HW accelerated Flash 10.1 which we are still waiting for)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gpmoo7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gpmoo7 I'd rather spend the $500 on a Droid Incredible.  Or for the other people here, an iPhone 4G or some other smartphone that can probably do more and be more portable than this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mr88  <br>PS - "other people" wasn't supposed to be insulting, I just mean those who aren't stuck on Verizon or wanting Android.  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mr88  I already own a Nexus One.<br>Since the first netbook appeared years ago, I always wanted to buy one but I still don't know what I'm gonna do with it and touchscreen is not helping.<br>I would definitely buy an Android/Linux tablet to give me larger-screen size WiFi-only smartphone but I won't spend 500$ on it.<br><br>Almost everyone already own a laptop so why buying a netbook?<br>Just because its cheap doesn't not mean it's cheaper than just not buying it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gpmoo7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gpmoo7 <br>Huh?  Still waiting for?  I use hardware accelerated flash on my Thinkpad Edge, works perfect.<br><br>Sure it's still in Release Candidate form but it is usable.  Maybe you mean officially supported.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dubb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dubb  <br>Uh he means most netbooks have a Atom chipset, and they're not supported at all. (Except for Menlow)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ninetynine99]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gpmoo7 <br><br>They're not targeting anyone in particular.  They're just throwing all sorts of crap out and hoping it will be a success to somebody, anybody.  They're playing it safe by sitting on a fence, although a very pointy fence.  Not quite a netbook, not quite a tablet.  It's not a terrible device.  It just won't sell to consumers that want to buy a real tablet.  The average consumer won't be able to figure out what it is and will avoid it like the plague.  It's no better than a common netbook.  Just more expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MosesusedaniPad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gpmoo7 I run IT at a medium sized architecture firm. Most of workstations are now quadro based laptops, however having a cheap netvertible would be nice to assign to each person for their concept sketches, and meeting note taking. Onenote 2010 really is something else and this device is amazingly suited for it.<br><br>While Joanna's reviews are quite good, basing much of the review on finger touch on the interface isn't of much use to me. I'd love to see a review of the hardware clean installation of Windows and some time in a real piece of productivity software - Onenote 2010.<br><br>Anything I can do to eliminate paper (and the need to scan/archive) is a big benefit. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeekPI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GeekPI  <br>I hugely waiting for a netbook-sized proper tablet.  Not a half-netbook / half-toy.  If this thing does a good job as a proper tablet - meaning pen markup / drawing.  Then it's perfect for me.  Right now I drag a huge laptop and a wacom tablet with me for my work as a technical instructor.  Real tablets are far too expensive, and I like the tablet for its portability - travel etc.  I would love to see a review of this which doesn't make the mistake of comparing this to that silly iPad toy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[really not liking the eee lines chintzy black and chrome designs of late.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Davo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand why they used an OS that's not touch friendly on this thing. Who the Hell sat in a room with a group of developers and said "let's make it touch screen, but I don't really want them to touch the screen too much". ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Waltah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Waltah <br>I'd like to know what non OSX based OS is touch friendly in your mind at this size? Because Android isn't as touch-friendly as people are making it out to be without some serious skinning.<br><br>And considering they used the one flavor of windows 7 that doesn't support touch, I'd say your comment is more rant than reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RemDX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rem DX  <br>So $500 sounds like a deal for a touch device that has horrible touch capabilities? Even with upgraded windows simple scrolling in the browser sucks. That's not a rant. Pinch to zoom  went from 0 to a billion in one swipe. That's piss poor implimentation. I guess I'd have to have real hands on with one, but it looks like a waste. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Waltah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/27/asus-eee-pc-t101mt-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It should be pretty clear by now that Atom processors can't cut it with full Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spectre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2010 11:39AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
