http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
I couldn't agree more. I really want to get an m11x, but not if it uses a slower processor than my 2.5 year old Dell's 1.66GHz C2D.

And before you say that this Core i7 has a slower clock speed than my Dell as well, please note the Turbo Boost speed of 2.53GHz.

Put this ULV i7 into the m11x, throw Optimus into the thing, keep the price similar to what it is now, and Alienware can have my money.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
for a cosmetic makeover? ]]>Apr 28th 2010 5:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 5:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 29th 2010 5:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
This seems silly. The difference in performance between the double and triple channel desktops parts is very small on a clock for clock basis. What would the point of using triple channel in a mobile part be? Keep in mind that these run at half the clock speed of the desktop i7s, so having "only" 2/3 the memory bandwidth wont hurt at all.]]>Apr 28th 2010 5:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/what ever this goes in wont be called a netbook, I guess.
I'd rather have ULV i5 with turbo boost in a laptop, if there's such a thing, plus an external video card to go with my external monitor if I want to play those GPU demanding games.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 5:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Acer 1410
Acer 1810t / 1810tz
Lenovo U150
ASUS UL20A
ASUS UL30A / UL30VT

I'm using an Acer 1410 with a 1.2 GHz dual core SU2300 CULV processor. It handles 1080p out via HDMI fine. Hulu runs full screen fine with low res (not 480p though). If a 1.46 GHz i7 ULV processor comes out in a similar form factor as this netbook, I'm definitely upgrading, it will be awesome.
]]>Apr 28th 2010 6:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/I want to see something like this in a MBA.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/NVM, it's dual core, I thought it might be quad because of how high it could turbo.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
I assume all i7's are quad]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/no it's dual core, all the i7 ULV processors are dual core]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
No no no.... You all have it wrong! It's Octacore!!!]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
All kidding aside, if you click the source link, you will clearly see that it's Dual Core.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
For the most part ignore the series number (i3,5,7), and focus on the chip number.

3xx +
4xx +
5xx +
6xx = dual core

7xx +
8xx +
9xx = quad core, or hex for the 9xx
]]>Apr 28th 2010 5:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 5:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 9:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 10:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
The 520UM should replace the SU7300 chips.

These will replace the SU9600s. ]]>Apr 28th 2010 5:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
what makes you think Apple will put this in?? Considering the most popular macbook pro is STILL using Core2Duo, it will be a loong wait for you]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Only if Intel and Nvidia settle their differences.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/What's so bad about that if you can also get i5 or i7 should you need that? Chances are Apple will use these if they're any good, don't see why not. Next MBP refresh should be around christmas I guess, so the timing is right too.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
I think I read somewhere that Intel is going to stop making the Core 2 Duo's this Summer, so Apple will have to switch to something else (i7 ULV or A4) or drop the 13" line.]]>Apr 28th 2010 5:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/going by Apple's past refresh schedule I'd guess we more likely see this in the fall for a MacBook Air refresh. If Intel does stop making C2Ds this summer then I would expect the 13" MBP to go to an i3 or lower end i5. I'm surprised already that they stuck with the c2d for this cycle as opposed to an i3. I would also expect the Mac mini to get a processor refresh in the fall to transition all of the models to the Core 2010 series. ]]>Apr 28th 2010 6:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
Apple fan boys valiantly defend Macbook overheating with that ridiculous argument, so Intel should be ready to wield it as well.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Just wait a long while after they pop up in other lappies. Then you may see them.
-glares at Apple-]]>Apr 28th 2010 6:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/
and from own experience with a core2duo ULV at 1.2ghz i can say these chips are awesome. gigahertz are so overrated. an ulv system with lots of parallel power + an ssd == silent, very fast machine that consumes about no power.

atoms are ridiculous crap compared to this.

and i guess this i7 dances around my c2d. faster clock, hyperthreading, and esp. the turboboost sounds like this cpu adapts, if needed, to big jobs very well.

cost effective? not really. but worth it? yes indeed.]]>Apr 28th 2010 4:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 8:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 4:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/28/intel-said-to-be-prepping-1-46ghz-core-i7-ulv-processor-for-this/Apr 28th 2010 5:00PM