<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[You let the Razr success go to your head... GoodbyeMoto]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattsZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MattsZ <br><br>I think they're over that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bolezhinkov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MattsZ Yea, this is what they get for re-releasing the same RAZR without anything new.  Motorola Corp is getting what they deserve, like the US auto industry in the 80s and 90s.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Center]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Center  <br><br>I agree USA cars are a bad joke...<br><br>the only car that they made that was decent was the Buick Regal with the Turbo (aka Grand National) and they killed it off becuase fat ugly slobs  were pissed because they were getting their arse handed to them when they bought the corvette. (also the Trans AM did that too)<br><br>Motot you passed up on the PALM OS.. now you die]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truth.seeker (bart_cop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AppleDrank  <br><br>You must not be up to snuff on the Ford & GM cars of the last 3 years.  Ford especially has insanely good quality, feature rich cars which are more reliable than most Asian & European cars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TwiggenBerries]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA["Not yet"?? The phone division dropped into 9th position in market share. Behind Apple. Their market share dropped into half from year ago. Motorola phone division needs to be put out of misery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[machat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@machat Yes, they are sure out of the game... Maybe Moto should try to sell the phone division to HP and let it sick together with Palm :P<br><br>But Engadget is a funny place, here we see a happy face, even though the company is doing poorly.<br><br>But when Nokia posts a profit, Engadget does a fox-news kind of journalism and twist the facts, puts an image of an N97 with blood finger prints and hints that things are very dire... <br><br>Come on guys, be more partial... Just like in the Steve Jobs comments about openess of Flash, where is the jabs you guys throw at MS for example?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr w00t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's pretty amazing how far Moto has sunk, I mean they practically "invented" the Cell Phone Market. Or at the least the idea that a Cell Phone could be sexy with the Razor and they somehow blew it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[malexandria]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@malexandria1 Speaking of inventing the mobile phone market.  Does anyone know where I can see the old "Hello Moto" commercial that came out in 2000/2001?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Center]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@malexandria1 <br><br>No no, Motorola actually invented the cellphone, not just the market with the RAZR... the Motorola DynaTAC]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapryt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[What would you expect? They came out with a very decent phone, the Droid. Then instead of improving upon their Android options they put out blurified lackluster offerings like the backflip and devour. It's gonna take some real good hardware to compete with Apple and HTC in the future hopefully they can make things interesting. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeremytheIndian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JeremytheIndian Thanks for the intelligent post. So much better than hearing people calling for Motorola to go under.  I agree completely.  Motorola really needs to provide top notch hardware on the Android platform and just let Blur go.<br><br>Right now, unless you are HTC, its very hard to keep up with the pace of Android.  Their best best is to make hardware that is going work well on Android and stick their software developers with that group to make sure all the new versions get on their hardware as fast as possible.<br><br>I love my Droid.  Its a great phone. Great hardware and a great feel.  I hope they do well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[One pretty good phone and a lot of mediocre phones just isn't gonna cut it.  Especially against the stuff HTC is coming out with these days.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oghowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Motorola needs some sexy designed phones now. Tired of seeing their fugly phones. Its nice to see they made some profit and I want them to make more ( working with a moto contractor just to say)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nooruls143]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Problem is that sure Motorola Droid isn't bad device at all, but they are far far away from the days of competing with Nokia in global scale.<br><br>It's a huge drop to a point that many European and as far as i have understood some Asian countries don't even have Motorola phones available from retailers anymore.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[top]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[IMHO Moto has problems with design lately, The Droid and Devour keyboard are horrible. I thought the Devour keyboard's keys were soft rubber but they are just plasticky and bubbly I just did not like it to type. It looked like something else.<br><br>I do have to congratulate Moto for taking into Android. We have to admit, ugly or not, Moto has been consistently pouring options into the Android Market. I will go as far as to say that Moto and HTC are the major contributors into Android's success. I do want to see the Green Robot suceeed so he can continue doing this dance:<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CshYg0Tc-7k&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CshYg0Tc-7k&feature=related</a><br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C6zWKhVmkg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4C6zWKhVmkg</a><br><br>Why dont we have ads like this in the US for Android?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TikiTeko LOL those are awesome. Love the growling. Somewhat Lilo & Stichlike. <br><br>You do have to say 'ack' after seeing any new Moto android phone. They just don't have design skills. I think the Droid must have been a great fluke after seeing how much crap they are making. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Visualplastik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Motorola showed some skill when they designed the Droid. It's not perfect but it's still one of the best smartphones/Android Phones available.But after that... we get the Backflip which is a joke. Before the Droid we got the Cliq which also sucks especially when compared to the Droid. The Devour is ok at best but the keyboard blows and again, it's lackluster especially when compared to the Droid.<br><br>Motorola may well be a one-trick pony with the Droid with nothing else worthy of note. Hey, at least we got one killer phone from them before Moto shrinks back to irrelevancy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striderhayasa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HelghanSuperSniper <br><br>But the DROID is already obsolete.<br><br>Who would actually prefer a DROID over an HTC EVO 4G? IT is a total non-contest, especially with Verizon users also getting the Incredible. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DrDr  I would prefer the EVO over the Droid.  I however am a Verizon customer because my works pays for my phone so I am sticking with my droid..  My phone is not obsolete either.  There is this popular misconception that once something better comes out its completely useless.  I am able to run any app from the Android marketplace I want.  If my phone was obsolete this would not be the case.<br><br>I am perfectly comfortable with buying a phone and having a better phone come out a month to two months later.  In Verizons case the better phone for their network took 6 months.  I will happily wait another 6 months so I can get a new phone and I can't wait to see whats available then!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DrDr   that's the point you're missing. If you're on Verizon and you need a physical qwerty keyboard and want Android, show me an Android phone that's better than the Droid.It still runs great, has Android 2.1 and has a solid build on a great network.How is the Droid obsolete. That's a stupid assessment in and of itself. That is unless of course you want to play the stupid game of keeping up with the latest technology and buying a new phone every 3 months. The G1...you could make an argument for that being obsolete but then again, Cyanogen just got Android 2.1 running on that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striderhayasa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DrDr  Far from obsolete.  The DROID is going strong and is a favorite among people who like control of their phones. I only hope the DROID 2 is as good.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cb2000a]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2010 3:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'am also a part of their profit, i bought a droid for my girlfriend a few months ago, because she wanted to play farmville and stuff in her lunch break on her phone, so i bought the droid.<br><br>... you know the big commercial droid can and such! <br>...flash and such... <br><br>maybe android 2.2 then, so yes, thanks motorola for wasting my time and money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shizzle.dmg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shizzledmg <br><br>And the worst part is, they are making an iPhone Farmville app.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shizzledmg huh? So you didn't do research before you made the purchase of the Droid and assumed that it would support Flash out of the box? It's Motorola's fault that you didn't read and understand before giving up the cash? I'll fault Motorola for some things but that's your own fault for being a uninformed consumer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striderhayasa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft Paint WIN.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R762mm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they would start putting out good devices like the Droid and not terrible handsets like the ClickXT and the Backflip they would be doing a hell of a lot better. Stop screwing around MOTO and follow HTCs lead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lambdachi493]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's their old dumb phones that are hurting the bottom line in the MD category.  Their smartphone shipments are doing great...2.3 million in Q1.  As they ship out more Android models (right now they've introduced only 8 out of the 20 new models they intend) those sales will start making up a bigger percentage of total sales.  Just since they introduced two Androids to China last quarter, and I can't recall how many to South Korea, their percentage of sales to Asia has already increased 2% in the one quarter.<br><br>Oh, and many here will be surprised to know that the Backflip happens to be the third largest selling device on AT&T. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SharonW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SharonW <br><br>Yes, 2,3 Million, that is seriously awful. It does not even make them a top 5 player, even after the big droid push.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JFH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[For comparison, the leading smartphone manufacturer sold well over 20 million smartphones in Q1.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit  <br><br>22!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JFH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit  Leading smart phone maker?  Who, Nokia?  They sold 20 million SMART phones in Q1?  Sure you're not confusing that with how many total phones (smart and dumb) they sold?<br><br>Considering Apple sold 8 million smart phones in the last quarter, I think Mot is definitely in the top five having sold 1/3 as many as Apple coming from a cold start.  Got any links for proof?<br><br>In fact, I think Mot is still the leading manufacturer of phones in the U.S.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SharonW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SharonW  Nokia sells well over 100m mobile phones / quarter. 22m of those smartphones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[machat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[They P.O.'d a lot of people when they released the Cliq with Android 1.5 and then 2 weeks later push out the Droid with 2.0 and then their forums were nothing but people wondering when/if Cliq would ever be upgraded to 2.0, 2.1 and their forum manager had no answers.<br>Moto needs to be a bit more responsive to their customers. I will not be buying another handset from them until I see change.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Socalfrank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[This comany is tanking, but gets smiles from Engadget, though other companies make a billion every quarter and get introduced by blood stained devices. Strange. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JFH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JFH <br><br>This looks better. Can we have some bloody fingerprints please?! Just kidding. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JFH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Moto need the 'OPHONE'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wonderkid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[WAIT<br><br>People don't like sh!tty phones like the back flop and the cliq? ??<br><br> WHAT A SURPRISE! ! ! ! ! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well what did they expect after they released the backflip & devour....those things are crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supraped69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure why I'm defending Motorola since I haven't had a Moto since the StarTAC (yes kids that was the iPhone of its day, and with its WAP browser I could surf the web and AIM too!)<br><br>Doesn't Moto make the only Android phones worth mentioning?<br>(NOT sorry HTC)<br><br>If Moto fails, Android fails, at least in the US Smartphone market...<br>You have android you failed!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapryt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where's the HD angle..?<br><br>Not bashing, just curious, I follow all engadget twitter feeds, but was surprised to see this pop up a third time on @engadgethd]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fordy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FORDY Motorola produces STBs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Ziegler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chris Ziegler  <br>Ah, apologies :) That was a skim-read fail. I saw the Droid pic, phone in the title and whizzed through the numbers without taking in the mention to phone division as a side note.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fordy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[how bout YOU MOTOROLA BRING THE SHOLES TO AT&T and make some more dough their. Cause I would really love to have your DROID But AT&T is being bunch of dumb asses for getting your ugly Backflip. And the Devour too also love to have it on AT&T.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inspector Gadget80]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Inspector Gadget80 I got the Milestone to work on at&t,. Just buy one from Canada(through Telus) and unlock it and you're all set. eBay FTW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Someperson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Motorola made a Droid/Milestone with a hackable firmware, Google Navigator for Australia included in the box (or available from the market) and support for UMTS 900 and 2100, that would likely be my next phone to replace my Motorola Z6. Bonus points if they can convince Vodafone Australia to carry it so I can get it on a subsidy :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Wilson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 10:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola posts another tiny quarterly profit, phone division not yet pulling its weight (update)]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/motorola-posts-another-tiny-quarterly-profit-phone-division-not/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jonwil The DROID has an unlocked bootloader, the Milestone does not. Google Navigatior is Google's responsibility, funnily enough, not Moto's. And if you'd read up a bit you'd find that the Milestone IS a 900/2100 UMTS phone.<br><br>You might want to stick with your Z6.<br><br>In other news; DIE MOTO DIE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unimaginative]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 2nd 2010 6:50AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
