<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't this one the "Fujifilm Instax mini 7 Instant Camera" ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peacock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock My thoughts exactly...whats the caper?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tazproject4000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock <br><br>Wow...and the Fujitsu is just as overpriced.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  <br><br>Sorry, Fujifilm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock well i have to let you all know, its not like theres a better alternative to this.. i mean where can u get this kind of product for cheaper? does anyone know?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[emopoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock Good eye, thanks. I've updated the post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimStevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TimStevens  Thanks, It's too obvious<br>I prefer a remake Polaroid Joycam, rather than this copy...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peacock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock <br>Hey Peacock, With Your information that you have posted, I think this camera is "Instantly Dead". <br><br><br>I Don't Approve.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SOOPERGOOMAN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Peacock I'm curious what the arrival of the Polaroid 300 does to the future availability of the Fujifilm Instax Mini 7 and the Fujifilm instant film for that camera. Could it be possible that there's a legal dispute between Fujifilm and Polaroid with Polaroid winning out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yikesmoose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is Polaroid still in business? All they do is sell rebranded products, most of which are mediocre to begin with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadow08]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[talk about going back in time .. what a lame idea. Newsflash polaroid .. we are in the digital age.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[petegraham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@petergraham <br><br>Nostalgia is a huge market. We still want to get out the old games consoles and you can still buy a new megadrive (all be it not made by Sega). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mavoric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mavoric  meh .. its an overpriced piece of "nostalgic" rubbish .. but i get what your saying.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[petegraham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@petergraham Newsflash Peter. There is a market for it. Many artists prefer instant picture cameras over digital cams to test their motif before shooting it with the "real" camera. However. They wont be buying this, they'll just keep using their original polaroids and buy the still expensive but not so overpriced stockpile of good old polaroid casettes.<br><br>In short, just because you and me are in the digital age it doesnt mean digital is the be all and end all of photography for everyone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahumbug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[They could've done something with the design for this price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atkins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this is what they are going to be offering and if they actually expect peopl to pay this much, then I really don't see a bright future for Polaroid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robby2009]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sometimes I just don't get how people making marketing desicions can oversee something as obvoius as that noone is willing to pay that much for a piece of plastic NOR that anyone actually needs it. My phone makes better point and shoot pics for that matter...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thisNthat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. $90 for a piece of cheap chinese plastic.<br><br>They should have at least retained either the vintage land camera or bellows design, if they wanted to milk people for nostalgia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rk-d]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, I though that these things were long gone and forgotten.  Then, I needed to sell my house.  In doing so, my insurance agent needed to come out and take pictures (no clue why).  Anyway, he busts out a polaroid instant film camera.  Shocked, I asked "WTF?"  He said that they love the things because they will take the shots and put them in my file right away.  Says that sizing and printing photos on paper is just too much trouble, especially in light of having their computer networks so locked down that getting a proper photo printer is next to impossible.... so, I guess I can now see at least how one person will probably want this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JaSoN!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gr8hifi Sounds like they should just buy a printer you can stick memory cards into there pretty common now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peterthorpe81]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@petebob796  <br><br>There's also the PoGo products using zink (zero-ink) paper.  They only print 2x3inch shots, but it's edge-to-edge, cheap, instant, and you can print right from the camera without moving the files to PC first.  I got a decent camera and PoGo printer for my son last Christmas, and it works really well.  The paper also has a sticky back, so you can put them anywhere.  The picture quality isn't as high as using real instant film of course, but the quality vs. cost (about 30 cents a photo) is good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good lord. They can sell a halfway decent digital camera for that much. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ But you still have to walk to the copy/photo shop to get a decent print. Or you use your cheapass garbage printer and print it. Or you buy an expensive as hell quality printer to print it. Either way, its not necessarily cheaper if you want to hold your pictures in your hands instead of just looking at them on you screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahumbug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[but has this thing an LCD as well? For me a WIN can be a digital point&shot with the possibility to print Polaroid paper on the go]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Polaroid film/paper has a certain colour/image "quality" on it..something from the past. Trust me, you won't get the same results with any cheap or expensive digital  camera. Many people simulate the results on top of raw image files, but this needs further processing...<br><br>There is a market for Polaroid cameras at this price. Its  a relatively small market of photographers and photography enthusiasts. I  would like to shoot photos with a Polaroid camera again but i don't know for how long i will be doing this (probably not for over 50-100 photos). It seems that Polaroid have thought this, so they raised the value for more profit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is the most hideous piece of industrial design I have ever seen. Not one bit of it works! And whats worse the viewfinder lens and flash would probably be covered by users fingers when pressing the top button! <br><br>Or if it's the front button - more likely the users finger would press the lens when trying to find the button]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prowl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like a Picasso version of a penguin.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bstear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bstear LMAO, spot on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[combatcarl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Polaroid this isn't hard, Make a hybrid camera, not one that prints, one that actually exposes film like this one, but also has a second lens that records a digital copy, that way you can take real  polaroids and hand them out if you wanted to while retaining a copy of the picture. And what happened to the Polaroid Pic 1000? <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/polaroid-resurrects-instant-film-cameras/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/polaroid-resurrects-instant-film-cameras/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally, I see value in this ugly thing. There are times I wish had something very quick and dirty. I don’t see 90-bucks as a bank-breaker either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan O.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[We still use them at the gas station I work at.  We have a car wash and will use it to take pictures of damage if  someone says the wash broke something on their car.  I've also used them before when someone got hurt and took picture of and around were they got hurt.  The do still have a use, but nothing a digital camera couldn't be used for either.  Figure you get digital camera's for as cheap as this new Polaroid, so unless you already have a working Polaroid, may as well just get a digital, at least for the reasons I mentioned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[garfnodie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fauxhemians everywhere, rejoice.<br><br><br>I'd rather have a floppy disk camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Failbait]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Failbait Yeh Sony Mavica FTW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mukatuna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[i have a fujifilm instax max s7 and it's exactly the same and you can get it for £50]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good grief the world just got better. Now Polaroid just has to re-launch the SquareShooter 2 from 1973(my first camera), and I will be happy. Take picture, pull white tab, pull yellow tab, hold film pack for one minute, use 'cold clip' if air temp is under 12C, peel apart. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mukatuna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also note that Impossible Project film has nothing to do with this camera: it's designed to replace the 600 type Polaroid film for use in older 680 and other model Polaroid cameras that are no longer in production.  The camera featured here is a Fuji Instax (re-branded as a Polaroid camera) and uses film made by Fuji.  That film has its own merits, but has almost nothing in common with "nostalgic" Polaroid film. Instax prints look like this: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thirtyoneteeth/3580403486/in/set-72157619023601982/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/thirtyoneteeth/3580403486/in/set-72157619023601982/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chadallen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[See what happens when you let hipsters run amok...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[therodt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 10:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[They think I'll pay a premium for it, eh?  Perhaps they should think again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[combatcarl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[I heard that Japanese strip clubs were the single biggest users of Polaroid film for years.  This news will come as a great relief . . .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[solarbuddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're definitely riding the Lomograph wave. Still, even hipsters will weirdly saturate a photo in Photoshop and digitally print it for this kind of dough. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newfish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[If anyone is curious to see how it works, we have a hands-on review here: <a href="http://www.techlicious.com/review/polaroid-brand-instant-film-cameras-are-back/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techlicious.com/review/polaroid-brand-instant-film-cameras-are-back/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joshk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 12:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[Keep in mind:  Polaroid as a technology company no longer exists.  Rather, Polaroid is a brand that is licensed out by the company that bought the name when the Polaroid technology company went out of business. Unfortunately, apart from notalgia, the name means nothing anymore, and has been licensed out for a variety of third-party products, some of them of the "blah" nature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[What cost $20 a few decades ago would cost $51.40 in today's money. Still almost half the price of the Polaroid, but not too far off from the Fujifilm version :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[This should be categorized as a product of KIRF!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KiDoYu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is one ugly camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[biomi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2010 6:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Polaroid returns to instant photography with the 300, thinks you'll pay a premium for it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/29/polaroid-returns-to-instant-photography-with-the-300-thinks-you/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a Fuji Instax because Polaroid is licensing the name for them to put on it because people know Polaroid and instant film like they know kleenex and tissues, people will pay for it.  It costs more because Polaroid has to make their licensing fees off the product.  They are not setup in any way to make anything themselves, film or otherwise.  <br><br>As for people who compare this to anything digital or wonder how or why anyone would shoot instant film...well for reasons mentioned, it's convenient for certain professions, it's also a great evidentiary tool since you can't photoshop it.  As for artists and photographers...plenty of us still shoot film.  Shocking as that may be to some of you, we rather take pictures that come out looking a certain way rather than take bland pictures and spend ours on a computer to make them look that way.  We also aren't all old fogies or hipsters.  I shoot only film because it gives me the results I want and how I want.  As for the 'overpricing' of say Impossible's film or Fuji's....perhaps you're not aware, the reasons Polaroid went bankrupt in 2001 was because they were unwilling (not unable) to change their practices to the changing markets.  By that I mean they kept producing large amounts of film, even though they couldn't sell it all, they perhaps thought that if they kept the film cheap, it would find buyers.  <br><br>Clearly they were wrong, but instead of producing less film at a higher per-capita cost and raising prices, they simply folded.  It's apparent now that there is a market there with people willing to pay higher prices to keep the product around.  It's simple economics that if you produce less of something, it costs more per unit, and you have to sell it for more.  Operations like Fuji can charge less than Impossible because they can make the film a loss-leader having other products be more marked up while at present Impossible only has the film as their revenue stream.    ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 2:41PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
