<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how much one of these servers cost...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philipp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philipp <br><br>I sure their niche market will buy the servers and the regular consumer will benefit the standardization of SSD. I know I've held off because as good as it is to install my OS on a 64GB-SSD. I would much rather just have a 500SSD or 1TBSSD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philipp <br>Assuming a "cheap" $2/GB, the drives alone should run about $20,000.  The rest of the components are probably double or triple that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philipp <br>here you go:<br><a href="http://www.tpc.org/results/individual_results/IBM/IBM_780_TPCC_20100412_es.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.tpc.org/results/individual_results/IBM/IBM_780_TPCC_20100412_es.pdf</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[af_robot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@afrobot  <br>Wow, that price is just wrong.  ($825,000)<br>And, it doesn't even have the SSDs.  It has 26 1TB SATA drives listed at $1,199 each.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philipp If you have to ask, it's probably not for you....  Which isn't really a big deal since this thing is PowerPC powered so unless you plan on running AIX on it, its mostly just a really big and expensive paper weight.  Granted there are 8 quad core xeon boxes in the rack as well, but those are probably running Linux.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KAL326  Nope, I take that back.  The 8 client boxes are running Windows 2008 R2 Web Server Edition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kyzgar  Please read the detail disclosure : there's 3 x 3.5TB SSD Package @ page 2 summary of the full disclosure PDF<br><br>The total cost for SSD is 294342 USD (FC4367) at page 4 + 50400 USD for maintenance, which works out 98 USD per GB]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Li]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Philipp As the saying goes, "if you have to ask ..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LANjackal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet they'll put these (or something similar) in future satellites that need a ton of storage to take pictures and gather info. They said one that they just launched sends back 2tb of data every day, and HDDs don't seem like they'd make the trip to space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadgetcomexcludeengadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kind of reminds me of:<br><a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/monolith-action-figure.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/monolith-action-figure.shtml</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart People Play Tuba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[And 56 177GB SSDs is only...  $20,000-ish?  (assuming a cheap $2/GB)<br>For an enterprise environment, that's not too terrible.  The performance would be amazing.  Of course, that's only the drives.  You'd still pay a lot for the other components.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kyzgar About $805,000 for the other components, to be exact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sandfroce - reliability???<br><br>Madness...<br><br>If your SSDs fail randomly or after hibernating or standby they are not reliable - besides the fact that the controller compresses data and you have no clue if something gets lost or not...<br><br>Sandforce is definitely NOT a name for reliability.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DetlevCM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DetlevCM <br><br>Madness?  THIS !  IS ! SPAR---<br><br>Oh, never mind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smart People Play Tuba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DetlevCM, are you talking about that pre-production release of the SF1200+ which was used in the Vertex LE? Because I couldn't find any reports of the SF1500 being faulty or causing data loss? Please provide a source?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SSD  <br>From this is seems the 1500 was in the limited drives ;) <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/3661/understanding-sandforces-sf1200-sf1500-not-all-drives-are-equal" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/show/3661/understanding-sandforces-sf1200-sf1500-not-all-drives-are-equal</a><br><br>But the blunt point that a company sold a quarter baked product is reason enough not to trust it.<br><br>Besides the compression - and speaking of compression, depending on what files you use that won't even work.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DetlevCM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DetlevCM, The Vertex LE used a SF1200 controller with a special firmware closer to the SF1500. Sandforce sold this pre-production run to OCZ elusively for helping them with their development.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DetlevCM, if you're interested, here is a web link to an article about the SF-1500 controller. It explains in detail how and why it uses compression. <a href="http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-ssds-break-tpc-c-records" rel="nofollow">http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-ssds-break-tpc-c-records</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2010 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SSD  <br>Thanks for the link - but apart from the "pointer if the same exists in another cell" I didn't find anything on compression....<br><br>Personally I still wouldn't touch Sandforce with a pole.<br><br>My choice is Intel :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DetlevCM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2010 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay! But...IBM...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's wrong with IBM?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FAP FAP FAP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Stevenk <br>Uff wonder about the same thing as well? :)<br> Am i completly wrong if i think of IBM as a fine company who are known for there reliability, or is it just me? :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[IBM? The industrial till Company?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SamTatr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bet that server will be full of porn in no time...yep.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[YES!, no more will streaming 20 porn vids at once over many monitors be a up and down affair ! ! ! ! its all up from here on out :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Database ground, IOPS is king but not storage space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Li]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Incidentally the cost pr. GB is lower for the Intel 160GB "Postville" Solid State Disk.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andr&eacute;]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[That much solid storage in there makes my butt clench. Just being honest!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xanavi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Power7 is one hell of a chip too. That kind of processing power combined with all those SSDs is quite impressive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prevacator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 12:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[SSDs? I like this case.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Castaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmmmm, so shall I purchase a small island or s server? Decisions, decisions...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wowzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 3:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish IBM got back into the PC business. Given the construction quality and comparable specs in their old PC division (now Lenovo, which is slowly deteroriating the foundation that IBM created), they are only ones who I could see giving Apple a run for their money.<br><br>Dell, HP, Asus, MSI, Sony, etc - try as they may, I don't see anyone catching up to the quality and popularity of Apple, that is unless IBM decided to get back into the game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Coswyn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish IBM got back into the PC business. Given the construction quality and comparable specs in their old PC division (now Lenovo, which is slowly deteriorating the foundation that IBM created), they are only ones who I could see giving Apple a run for their money.<br><br>Dell, HP, Asus, MSI, Sony, etc - try as they may, I don't see anyone catching up to the quality and popularity of Apple, that is unless IBM decided to get back into the game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Coswyn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2010 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Coswyn<br>You're probably right.<br><br>I've never used Panasonic laptops (those that aren't completely rugged) but people say they're as good as it get in reliability and quality. m?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maratus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SandForce makes SSDs cheaper, faster, more reliable -- just how IBM likes it]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/03/sandforce-makes-ssds-cheaper-faster-more-reliable-just-how/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Coswyn <br>And Toshiba may do it right with their most expensive models (Portege R and such)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maratus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 12:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
