http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
Great point. It's probably significantly easier to sell CPUs when you've already got a laptop OEM's attention with your GPUs.

ATI's GPUs are the only DX11 mobile option, not to mention, the architecture is significantly more power friendly than nvidia's. So, even if Fermi does come to mobile, you'll likely see better battery life out of the Radeon 5000 series. ]]>May 9th 2010 10:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/Yup...and It's apparent intel has no fucking clue how to make a decent graphics chip. I would like to see some more AMD laptop options :)]]>May 9th 2010 10:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
b) intel is having manufacturing problems and their is a shortage of processors. this has oem worry about supply.

c)amd is cheaper. ]]>May 9th 2010 10:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
ayo my homies at intel did these cats like how we do it in the hood.. drive by style my dawg!!!!! ]]>May 9th 2010 11:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 11:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
While it's definitely true that Intel graphics have historically sucked major ass, their latest GMA HD chips are actually not that bad. They're almost as fast as their AMD/Nvidia IGP counterparts and are fully capable of driving 1080p video.]]>May 9th 2010 11:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/ shortages my a$$, intel does this kind of stuff to milk more money out of their latest CPUs which have been selling well, its like they forget AMD is still nipping at their feet]]>May 10th 2010 12:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/Then why are all these new netbooks getting shipped with broadcom crystal cards?]]>May 10th 2010 9:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
do work, amd!]]>May 9th 2010 10:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
+1 on the heat

I have a tx2500z from hp with an AMD Turion X2...and damn I hardly use it as a tablet anymore because of the heat and the fan noise from doing anything other than word processing]]>May 9th 2010 10:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/i know what you mean. the guy who lives next door to me at school has a dv2 that shuts off under load bc of heat. i hate intel as much as the next guy, but they've done awesome things in the mobile market recently.]]>May 9th 2010 11:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
Seeing as how AMD's desktop flagship CPU's, excluding the new Phenom II X6, are at best on par with Intel's Core 2 Quad series, I predict that AMD will finally be able to provide mobile C2D/C2Q level performance at cheaper prices with their Phenom II X2/X4 mobile chips. However, battery life will probably be worse, and they won't even come close to mobile i7's in performance.]]>May 10th 2010 12:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
]]>May 9th 2010 10:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
so you just hate everything I guess. Why are you here?]]>May 9th 2010 10:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
stupid troll. we're talking about the mobile market. not desktop cpu's.]]>May 9th 2010 10:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/@IPADISHORRIBLE
Are you stupid? Amd's athlon fx 64 killed the core duo. And amd's athlon fx Slaughtered the Pentium 4s. Not to mention Opteron server chips have had the performance advantage on and off again for years. And BTW you can often by two or more amd chips for the price of Intel's. Top of the lone chips ]]>May 9th 2010 10:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
agreed this guy has no idea what hes talking about. pentium 4 is what caused amd to dominate... its just these past couple years they have fallen behind but it looks like there may be a comeback ahead.]]>May 9th 2010 10:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/Troll troll troll your boat...]]>May 9th 2010 10:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/You are such an idiot. AMD has had better performing processors than Intel since the Thunderbird-based Athlon came out and the Pentium 4 was a flop. Sure there were times when Intel processors overpowered AMD processors such as when Intel's Northwood-based Pentium 4s were considered faster than the Thoroughbred-based Athlon XPs and when the Tualatin-based Pentium III outperformed the Thunderbird-based Athlon, but most of the time AMD processors could kill Intel processors in most applications. AMD's performance lead was in around 2006-2007 lost when Intel launched their Core 2 processors and AMD is now struggling to regain it.]]>May 9th 2010 11:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/Alright kids, stop feeding the trolls. Lets go over to the giraffes. You're allowed to feed them.]]>May 10th 2010 2:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
All I have to say is:

http://www.engadget.com/exclude/Leindurstit]]>May 10th 2010 4:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 11:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 10:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year//sarcasm]]>May 9th 2010 11:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
yeah, lol, that's less that 10 a month!]]>May 10th 2010 2:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 11:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 3:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 11:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
Not really]]>May 9th 2010 11:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 9th 2010 11:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
Besides, AMD haven't published a new mobile CPU ( except those neo etc ) in the last couple of years. So, may be AMD have done its homework in power management this time before unleashing the new chips. ( Just like they did in the GPU aspect ).]]>May 9th 2010 11:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 12:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 12:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
The new CPUs, by the way, are 25-45 W TDP. This is broadly comparable to Intel's mainstream notebook lineup, though yes, idle draw is just as important for battery life.

The 5--v series graphics chips are just rebrands of the mobile 4--- parts, so they are not DirectX 11. Sad but true. Not that you'll miss much given the GPU horsepower available, but hey...

]]>May 10th 2010 1:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
The Mobility Radeon 5000 are DirectX 11 parts.

http://www.amd.com/us/products/notebook/graphics/ati-mobility-hd-5700/Pages/ati-mobility-hd-5700.aspx]]>May 10th 2010 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 1:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 1:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
Lucid Lynx FTW!]]>May 10th 2010 1:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/May 10th 2010 4:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/09/amd-to-ship-chips-in-109-laptops-this-year/
http://www.shamlessadvertisingformywebsite.com/]]>May 10th 2010 5:13AM