<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only slightly larger than the HTC HD2]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xdreamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xdreamer. That's what Padme said]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Vader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Vader  Nice. +1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nickeedoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Vader  <br><br>I have used the Archos 5 before. And now I have the iPad. Based on pure quality, iPad is a light year ahead and by the ease of use, iPad is 2 light years ahead. I know Archos fans  will hate me for this, but believe me guys .... it simply cannot compete with the iPad in any way. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  I don't doubt it.  I don't want an iPad though I would like a quality android tablet.  This isn't it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tad604]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>"Pretty Resistivy" <br>Cute one Joanna. ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeKo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Vader<br>Padme has just lost her will to live.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xdreamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Vader  <br><br>No disrespect to Joanna and I hate pointing this out, but from 0:20 to about 0:34 of the video I was kind of lol'ing at the description of the hardware...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickjamess04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xdreamer It is actually a good bit bigger than the HTC HD2 but b/c it has the same resolution screen probably not much more useful  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darklay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xdreamer <br>Well , actually is almost double as big as my beloved HD2, (4.3 vs 7") but the HD2 is tha best choice for those like me who want a PMP/tablet which is also an excellent phone with a good camera/videocam, a screen big enough to use as GPS while driving and to enjoy movies and vids, and good VOICE DIALING capabilities.<br>I also love my new HTC Desire and I consider Android the best OS bar none, but the HD2 (and the HD before it) is the exception: HTC , with Sense UI, made the miracle of transforming the unnerving Win Mob into a sensible and practical OS integrated with a winning hardware package.<br>I don't even think that win7series can make it much better, actually I fear that it will ruin a perfectly good product.<br>Maybe the Dell 5" android tablet or the HTC EVO (if it comes to Europe) will make me ditch the Desire or the HD2 or maybe both, but for the moment the best tablet money can buy is still the HD2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plexus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  <br>I own the Archos5 and have used an iPad. I think the iPad needs work. No GPS? No Multitasking? Why would you buy an iPad? I use the Archos 5 with GLOVES a great deal because it HAS A GPS and I am using it as an electric bike dashboard.<br><br>The comments made in the review about running 1.5 are irrelevant and just plain WRONG. The 5 released with 1.5 and now has 1.6 with 2.X just around the corner (strange things have been happening on the site - any day now, IMHO). The OS can be upgraded over WiFi. What is she talking about? The 5 has access to the Android Market and the 7 will have it as soon as it has 1.6 which should be in about no time.<br><br>This reviewer needs to explore what she is talking about a little better before she spouts a review...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sschnelz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@StevenR  I was well aware of those things. And I did say a few times that I expect people to be able to update things, but Archos told me that "these firmware updates will not be able to administer an Android update." I'm just reporting what I was told. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  <br><br>a. Someone who wants an Ipad, is going to get an ipad and doesn't care what else is out there<br>b. You're comparing Archos to Apple? Why?<br>c. Someone who DOESN'T want an Ipad, will get something else and doesn't care how it compares to an iPad<br><br>I don't know why, but something about you trying to compare this to an iPad just feels really fucking dumb.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@StevenR  <br>Dude...if you need a GPS, just buy a GPS. They cost less than $75 now. Also...multitasking will be available in August for the iPad (iPhone OS 4). The only thing that most Android fans are holding against the iPhone OS, will be finally over. <br><br>All I am saying is if iPad and Archos is compared side by side, 9 out 10 people will chose the iPad (the 1 who isn't, is 'you').]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  <br><br>Yes, you get what you pay for.  Only geeks will love this because of the $199 price tag and all the tinkering they'll get to do to make it work halfway decently.  It may be a piece of crap tablet, but it's totally open and runs all the porn apps that Android offers.  Oh, and Steve Jobs didn't touch it nor does it have an Apple logo so it must be good...  And for a mere $199 which is the supposed sweet spot pricing for all tablets.  The cost of a netbook minus a keyboard.<br><br>This device is made for fAndroid lovers and iHaters everywhere.  You officially have an iPad killer...  NOT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MosesusedaniPad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  Been waiting this one to be reviewed since it was first previewed on a brochure. And I must say, its great. Opinions- <a href="http://j.mp/archos-7-tablets-reactions" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/archos-7-tablets-reactions</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kelstiran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  Most users should choose Archos, it's 3 times cheaper than the iPad, it plays all video codecs like DivX, MKV, RMVB, Mp4, Mov, and all audio codecs even Flac and Ogg Vorbis. Of course people who are too rich for BitTorrent and just buy their movies and music on iTunes won't care about saving money on the tablet in the first place.<br><br>Archos 5 Internet Tablet also is half the price of iPad, fits in a pocket (means you will take it with you everywhere), can even be hacked to run other types of Linux like Maemo, Angstrom probably Ubuntu soon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  <br><br>"Won't be able to administer an Android update"  I'm confused.  Does that mean the owner could install an update but Archos Firmware won't or does it mean something else?<br><br>Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[caleb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  <br><br>...except for that little nagging issue about storage.<br><br>An Archos with a hard drive blows away an iPad in this respect.<br><br>An Archos is also easier to deal with in terms of getting your own content onto it and getting stuff back off of it. Having an iPad would not do anything to keep me from wanting a video playback device that I can load up with enough stuff to make sure it will have something on it that I want to watch.<br><br>For video, an iPad is kind of "nano" sized.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jedi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@StevenR  I have a Archos 5 as well and as soon as I took it out of the box and connected to my router I was prompted for an update to 1.6. Ironically, the bit about the Archos market is true in the fact about it's annoying that Google Marketplace support isn't native, but if the Archos 7 is similar to the Archos 5 then updating the 7 to gain all Google apps and Google sync is a 2 minute process of downloading the market4archos .apk file that can be found in multiple places online and literally just running it and letting it do the rest. Full Google Experience support can be had for less thought than it takes to search the web for .apk files. <br>But I can't blame the reviewer for not knowing this or at least not mentioning it as she may not be familiar with the A5 or the current state of it.<br><br>Unfortunately the A7 is a step backwards. No accelerometer? Lame. No capacitive screen? lame. Sure I can use the A5 Android's screen but going back to a capacitive screen is a harsh reminder of what could have been. Only 128MBs of RAM? Lame. As a media player the Archos rocks but when you start running serious Android apps ,multitasking takes you back to the G1 era of lag-a-lisicious style of usage.<br><br>Comparisons to the Ipad? Ipad is better built overall. with a better screen, better gaming support, better support and stability overall but as a media player, Archos with its superior codec support has the Ipad beat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striderhayasa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 2:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  belive it or not android fans will always hate the iphone and ipad not just cuz it doesnt have all the features android has but also cuz of the company and the fact ur locked down with apple it goes depper than just the iphone having multi. but there heading in the right direction atleast with the multi. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocopuffs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  Well Comparing a $200 device to a $499+ device hardly seems fair. It's 250% more and probably 10,000% better so I am sure it justifies the cost, but still... I don't like to compare devices that have such a large difference in price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Origosis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 3:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot<br><br>But it sure fits better in my pocket than an iPad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m-p{3}]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  <br>This means it doesn't come over the air - you need to plug in and drag the AOS file to the root folder and reboot. That's hardly un-updateable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sschnelz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@StevenR  iPAD has GPS (in 3G version) and multitasking is coming in OS 4 update. This is not an iPad killer, but it suits much better for bike computer. I doubt you'll want to attach 10" iPad to your handlebar :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bratan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 4:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@StevenR The iPad has assisted GPS ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iTouchiReview]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2010 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  Ipad is considerably more expensive though . When reviewing stuff like this you have to take price into account. And then it shows the Ipad is overpriced because you see similar specs in much cheaper devices ( the fact they're not that good is usually due to OS used or utilization of that OS ) . <br><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5458231/apple-ipad-price" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5458231/apple-ipad-price</a><br><br>when you examine this you see the 16Gb WiFi -only Ipad sells for a steep $499 , compared to the $199 of this Archos or $ 279 for the Dell Mini .  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rik66]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2010 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot  <br><br>Aww man, there goes somebody comparing these two again, I don't remember the two ever being in the same class, esp with the almost $300 price difference<br><br>~Go Archos~]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iceburgpyro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2010 1:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@browserspot <br><br>Or someone who doesn't like apple or someone who doesn't want to spend 500 or someone who has an android device and is more familiar with it, etc etc.  <br><br>Believe it or not there are p?eople who will buy anything that apple makes bc it is apple and there are people who won't for the same reason.  They are very common.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xdreamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2010 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Hate Everything  <br>Now when you say "trying to compare THIS to an ipad" on an Archos 7 review, I'll assume your referring to the Archos 7, tragically, the user your poodle-ing at was refereeing to the Archos 5, and as for your points A. and B. doesn't the fact that the user owns both seem like a reasonable reason to compare them? Or would you recommend he ignore reality? Something feels BLEEP Dumb alright and his breath smells like onions in the dungeon. Hey Engadget.com welcome to Desertdude! 1st.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[desertdude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2010 7:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@desertdude If I want to compare my Mr. Mac 128 to the Dell Streak I can because I'm sapient. That won't get me banned will it? This hate everything guy is making me hate 1 thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[desertdude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2010 7:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[im still waiting for that archos phone...<br><br>(yes i know, i know. going to actually read the review now)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@skyblaze<br><br>K, finished reading. Very nice job as usual =)<br><br>I have an Archos 5... but it's been replaced with my Cowon V5... Sure it lacks some of the features the Archos has... but my Nexus covers those just fine. The slick interface and awesome codec support the Cowon has makes it feel overall a better choice for me]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[5-inch thick? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chaim <br>0.5]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tmurph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tmurph thanks I realized I missed the . Right after commenting :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chaim <br><br>lololo i read that the first time too.<br>Is there anything not to love about it? It's 5 inches thick ....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrjaggs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[So let me get this straight, it's not running the latest OS FAIL. seeing that android is open, google restricted the market place FAIL. People do know u can't use adobe flash on it because it's a older OS Fail. Android is nice, but it does have serious fragmentation issue that pisses off developers. Get it together, at least this is better then the archos 9 that wins windows 7]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leroysboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Leroysboy <br><br>Archos 9: Seriously, replace the 1.8" drive for an SSD type and the damn thing is beautiful. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am very disappointed. I love the idea of a 7" Android tablet - especially one costing $200. But the hardware and software choices that Archos made make this one DOA in my book. On the hardware side it needs to have a capacitive multitouch display, a real SD slot, it needs bluetooth and it would be nice to have VGA or HDMI out. On the software side it needs an up-to-date OS and the promise of future upgrades, and it needs access to every Android app. Otherwise there's almost no point in having an Android machine in the first place. I'm glad I didn't pre-order this. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman <br>That's why it costs only $200. With all the "extras" that you want to see, no way it could still be $200... Find anything equivalent at that price... good luck... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[garmac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman But then if it had all those, it wouldn't have been $200.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wywywywy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wywywywy  I don't think that what I 'm suggesting would cost much money at all; a capacitive screen maybe adds a few bucks, but bluetooth and real SD slot wouldn't add more than $10 to the final retail cost. And updated OS and access the full catalog of Apps? That's free. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 10:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman  <br><br>Uhh the capacitive screen in the ipad was almost $100 bux by itself. I suggest you research a bit and stop just assuming things.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TWiz  and the updated O/S and Market aren't 'free'.<br><br>They'd have to spend time testing out 2.1 ie money, and if you want the Market you have to ask Google very nicely to sign off on the build - I presume this also costs money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabid_Squirrel_Inc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TWiz  Bullshit. Cost estimates of the iPad's screen are about $65, not $100. Second, the iPad screen is 9.7" with a 4:3 ratio, which is roughly 45 square inches of display, compared to this which is a 7" widescreen with a total area of about 20 inches - less than half that of the iPad. One can't obviously say there's a 1:1 ratio of price of prodution and screen size, so a similar capacitive screen for the Archos might not be quite $32.50, but I bet it would be close.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Karnak  a cost I'm sure would be outweighed by actually creating a product that people might want to actually buy instead of one that most people will dismiss as crap. Apple showed that people will pay a HUGE premium for a device that is done very well. Archos easily could have made a $250 device that would have competed on a quality and functionality level, but instead they chose to cut corners and shovel out the crapware like some Chinese KIRF maker. That's just idiotic business planning in my book.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman <br>Archos made a mistake choosing $200 price point. I would buy this tablet for $300 if they added capacitive touchscreen and accelerometer.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maxim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman 7" capacitive screen just doesn't exist on the market. If ipad does a capacitive, first it's the most expensive component of the ipad, second they can only do it because they order millions of custom made screens from the screen manufacturer. For now, using a resistive screen costs about $100 less than using a capacitive. Would you pay $100 extra just for a capacitive option?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charbax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/archos-7-home-tablet-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weatherman  the Archos 5 Android, has bluetooth so I can't see why Archos would take that out of the A7. Actually, the Archos 5 has a few key features that the Archos 7 doesn't. If Archos did this to get the A7 in at $200 they've made a big mistake. This device isn't better than the Archos 5 Android other than the fact that the screen is bigger. Lame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Striderhayasa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2010 3:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
