<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn...after a long wait, a good looking slider comes out for Android...and it is still a ... half-baked letdown ...<br><br>I want an EVO with a qwerty keyboard...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapanak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak it still looks like a pretty nice looking phone. i'm probably thinking about picking this bad boy up once i can upgrade in a few months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AwlAmericanDawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak Actually Droid has been out for quite some time and it's gorgeous.  Not exactly sure what you're referring to here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lerxst]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lerxst  Actually Droid has been out for quite some time and it's gorgeous. Not exactly sure what you're referring to here.<br><br>Dude what's not to get!  Evo has Snapdragon, more ROM/RAM, a bigger screen, front-facing camera...it's definitely a step up from the Droid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NaeemTHM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lerxst  <br><br>I own a Milestone (Droid) and I love it...but I was looking for something a bit more "punch" to it...that is also a slider...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapanak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NaeemTHM  : Correction. It's a staircase ahead of the DROID.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak <br><br>Yup, it is disappointing.  I really wanted to recommend this phone to a friend if it held up in the review, but I/we will keep looking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@blenderman345 than stock droid yes, overclocked droid...not as much]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robert.stewart2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BobStewart  <br><br>OK...WTF? How many Droid users out of the 2-3 million owners do you think have rooted their devices and overclocked theirs? It is slightly risky, and many people don't see the benefit in it...<br><br>To add insult to injury, my Milestone is bootloader is signed, hardware locked, it is unrootable...and all of us Milestone users are stuck with the stock 550Mhz...Don't tell me there is no difference between Droid and Nexus One or EVO...There is a six/nine months difference in technology, and that is a whole generation of difference...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapanak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak  <br>The Milestone's bootloader is locked but it still is rootable.  You can not overclock it or flash unofficial ROMs, but you are able to install programs which require root access like WiFi tethering.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak <br><br>It was to be expected, when was the last time LG ever made a desirable smart phone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theedude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak <br>I saw the writing on the wall last week when I read that the Ally likely wouldn't handle flash and just went ahead and got the Moto Droid. I couldn't be happier, and this article confirms I made the right choice. Actually, with BOGO and two new contracts (switched from ATT), both I and my wife got a Droid for only $200! That's hard to beat and totally worth it. I was worried about how she would take it, as she uses a macbook for her main computer, but she has taken to the Droid and Android OS really well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarus Dark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak then too bad for you but for real droid users we can over clock and make or phones faster than a snap dragon]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randazzo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak A good phone indeed, but not comparable with EVO 4G. I say get this, if you're looking for a cute alternative. <a href="http://j.mp/ally-phone-from-lg" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/ally-phone-from-lg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[selenalovt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 19th 2010 3:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Randazzo Dangerous. The OMAP 3430 wasn't designed to be clocked to speeds higher than 1 Ghz (or even 1Ghz itself), which is why devs in WebOS Internals haven't done it (800 Mhz is the current max for the Pre right now).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2010 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks fugly for $100....<br><br>But thats to be expected with android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheLondonExchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheLondonExchange Let the flame wars.... Begin!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaldinggreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheLondonExchange oblivion troll gets downranked to whence he came...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheLondonExchange "But that's to be expected with Android"<br><br>and you go around crying Wolf about how people bash iPhone OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really thorough review, thanks Chris.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I keep waiting on a good, budget android phone on T-Mobile, which has a $59 off contract plan with unlimited data and texts. Put out a decent  android phone for $300 off contract and you'll have a winner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[preslove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@preslove <br>I would just like to say, LG makes the worst phones that I ever used.<br>A company that has their hands in various markets and comes up mediocre in all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@preslove I'm not sure what the pricing will be on the MyTouch Slide, but you might want to look into that. It should be a midrange phone and falls in line with the rest of the MyTouch line. Come to think of it, does T-mobile even have a high-end Android phone? For being the first carrier in the world to sell an Android device they sure seem to have fallen behind everyone else.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CapnShiner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 5:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems like a decent low(ish) priced phone.  I'd certainly rather have this than a feature phone (ditto with lowerpriced nokia s60 offerings too, glad we're moving in this direction).  I'm more concerned with total cost of ownership, however.  Sure, on contract this is $100 (all of $80 less than the Nexus One on contract), but what is that going to run you over two years?  I'm guessing it would be cheaper to buy the Nexus One off contract and go with month to month on T-mobile than it would be to buy the Ally.  Engadget - you've proved that you're a force amongst the gadget/phone world - can you use this to start pushing contract free existence and opening people's eyes to total cost of being on contract?  I've love to see consumers pressing back on this, and Engadget is in a good place to help lead the charge.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eddie W <br><br>+1<br><br>Maybe Sprint's excellent plans will start to be noticed and VZW's and AT&T's will be shown for what they really are: insanely expensive over the course of two years.  The initial price of the phone is just a drop in the bucket before monthly bills start adding up along with any overage charges, taxes, fees, etc.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't the Droid also down to $100 with a contract? Just get one of those instead. Still the best selling Android handset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bravokiloromeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bravokiloromeo is it bad that i no longer care about phones that lack a 4"+ screen and at least a 1ghz snapdragon? Everything else just seems so dinky and toy like to me... and i know im in the minority in the world but probably not on engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveyAyo <br>The Droid, like the Ally, has a graphics chip, which lightens the load and makes it just as fast as the Nexus One, etc. And you can overclock it to 1.2 GHz!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bravokiloromeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bravokiloromeo <br>Yeah, I would probably go that route too... the only reason I could think not to would be that this keyboard looks more usable.  I tried using droid's keyboard for a while and basically ruled it out for that reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Eddie W  yeah my friends and brother have the droid and it is amazingly fast... but i think ill wait on the Mondrian]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SteveyAyo   Dang, I thought smart people would realize this.<br>Anyway, Android is NOT JUST FOR GEEKS(aka, people like us who appreciate gadgets). YES, Engadget readers like high end phones. YES, we think all Android Phones should be that way, bigger and badder than the last. BUT IT'S NOT RIGHT. I mean, the world is not like us. They may not need all those features, let alone pay for it. This is a good handset for the average user. I would buy it, were I not locked in for another year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leland Robinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Firehazel  <br>Just because we "geeks" like high end hardware doesn't mean we don't appreciate the quality as well. Also, why would you buy a phone that does the same things worse and slower than another phone with roughly the same specs at the same price? The Droid and Ally have the nearly the same functions, and almost the same hardware, so your "may not need all those features" point is entirely moot. <br><br>Picking the better product here is a matter of common sense, not some sort of gadget lust we have.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bravokiloromeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bravokiloromeo  From the point of non-gadget people:Price. That's probably the single most determining factor in the purchase of a cellphone. Call me miserly, but I like to stretch dollars from here to Mars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leland Robinson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol the nexus got tired and went to sleep]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RE4SON]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not a bad phone. It seems to be a solid lower end Android phone for the masses. This is something that Android needs. For $100, it will make a lot of people happy. Not all Android phones can be top of the line because not everyone wants to spend the money on a top of the line phone.<br><br>Oh, and please stop encouraging HTC's "chin" phones. The are far from "drop dead sexy".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AJerman I disagree. The chins are so much nicer than these ridiculous half-circular bottoms that serve no function whatsoever. Overly rounded corners have been ugly since inception.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cleecanth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AJerman <br><br>I'll disagree as well.  The chin adds charachter.  As long as the phone's chin doesn't get in the way (and it shouldn't since most android phones have some space below the screen for the home, back, and menu buttons) I'll encourage the chin every day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 10:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[How's the asian language support on this phone?  One of the concerns a few of my international friends have had is the extremely limited CJK support in the OS.  I figure, since LG is Korean, they might have some sort of Korean support baked in...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[yea good job chris. more like this please]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900androidOS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900androidOS <br>+1 on the review. i will keep coming back for these]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neonext]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really, it's inevitable with Android, you need horsepower to appreciate the Android OS. Yeah, I'm all for cheaper options too but they should have stripped it down like crazy to have a "smooth" experience but then would you still be able to call it Android? Would it be recognizable? Probably not... Where am I going with this? No idea...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame umm... yes? thats the best part of android, its open source and customizable. Any company can take it and make it perfect for their specific handset. Do they? often times no but when they do you get the best handsets on the market (EVO, Droid and Droid Incredible)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[this looks like its a device from the past. buttons, arrow buttons, more buttons - horrible! <br>...if u r too stupid to improve the UI of ur OS, just use a ton of buttons! yeah!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fuesse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to say, I expected much more from LG. <br><br>WWDC - JUNE 7TH - SOLVE ALL YOUR SMARTPHONE PROBLEMS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Snowelevation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Snowelevation <br><br>I am not sure my "smartphone problems" will be solved with a 3.5inch screen, 256mb of ram, and a "walled garden" app ecosystem. Also, Rogers in Canada, and I'm sure AT&T in US, do not provide a very reliable 3G network...Telus does though, and their 21Mbps is quite nice...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapanak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Snowelevation actually June 4th is that day get it correct]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CRACKBERRY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kapanak  ok lets get one thing straight i was on ATT for a long time during the iPhone reign and i owned a blackberry, because im not a sheep, and guess what? My phone never once dropped a call!!! I had zero problems with att, its the iphone not the network... shoddy software builds on a lackluster phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveyAyo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is that in the U.S. market, the heavy subsidies and pricey, mandatory data plans have removed much of the value of a set like the Ally when considering the TCO. That's why I can't give up my Q9H and its $15 data plan...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nefnet13]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nefnet13 <br>Ditto with my unlocked nokia phone and a $10/m internet plan through t-mobile.  $20/m extra for data equals $480 over two years.  I'd rather have an Android phone, but not at that price - especially when the on contract price of the phone would cost me almost as much as my s60 phone unlocked.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 5:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/17/lg-ally-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get why people focus so much on the initial cost of the phone.  After two years of paying voice and data every single month, $100 is chump change.  Just get the HTC Incredible, it's $8.33/month over 2 years vs $4.17/month for LG Ally]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 3:48PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
