<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[interesting how everyone is trying to profit from "green mother earth saving" tech. Shame]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk Why is it a shame? If a company can make bigger profits while helping keep plastic out of junkyards, I'd call that a win-win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk <br><br>That's a good thing, isn't it?   The alternative would be a huge power hungry hog that would cost an arm an a leg and uses up natural resources like there's no tomorrow.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk <br>if it's a decision between comparable specs and price but one pc uses less material and power- I'd choose the earth friendly pc. <br><br>It's not as if they're charging big taxes to to have a "green" pc. If two pc's perform the same and cost relatively the same yet one is better on the environment- why not choose choose the "green" pc?<br><br>It MAY be to distinguish their computer from others- but everyone stills wins.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@think before you react  I want a green, earth friendly (and if possible fanless) pc as well, but I dont want to pay that extream premium for it. 499?! I mean com'on it probably costs them a 100 bucks to make this thing (ok maybe not 100 but U get the picture)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk <br>Yeah, good point.  Let's get back to profiting from the destruction of our planet...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bully]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bully  <br>U are missing a point, Im for a green tech as well, but Im not for a 250$ tax for it that companies are charging.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk  <br>No, you're totally right in your train of thought.  It's best we get consumer goods to market as cheap as possible, even if it means destroying our planet.  Because remember NK, it's not YOUR responsibility to help save the planet, someone else will do that for you.<br><br>You just won the Ignorant MoFo of the Day award.  Grats!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bully]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@think before you react  <br><br>It looks like they're just charging more for less. You can nearly get a mini for that pricetag and the specs might not even be on par with a Revo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jedi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bully  <br>U really think that making this thing green costs 250$ extra? Cuz if U do Im really sry for U.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jedi  <br>my toughts exactly]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nk The MSRP of my tiny Inspiron Zino HD that I'm actually typing on right now was around $850.<br><br>Unless your company logo is a fruit, 99% of the time your product doesn't sell for MSRP with third party retailers, sometimes intentionally inflated so people feel they are getting an awesome deal.<br><br>My $850 Dell cost me I believe $402 maxed out thanks to the discount from Dell along with a 25% bing cashback at the time.   Its silent, plays blurays, and has a neat dedicated 512mb ATI card for 1080P videos and light gaming w/ 7.1DTS over HDMI.    I couldn't be happier.<br><br>So wait for the true street price on Amazon or Tiger before bitching and moaning. =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br><br>I know the Zino isn't meant for that, but how is gaming on it?  Could I run something like L4D2 or MW2 on low with it and have it be playable?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br>so in a way U agree with me that 499$ for this thing is a lil 2 much :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bully <br><br>You are completely missing nk's point. If companies continue to charge ridiculous prices under the guise of 'saving the earth' then people will continue to look at the movement as a huge money making scam, and rightfully so. How about stop making the exhorbiant profits on 'green' technology so it can become mainstream instead of screwing both humans and the earth?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wowzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wowzers  <br>TYVM thats what Im trying to say]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wowzers  <br>I don't think they're upping the price as a green markup tax, but the cost to acquire some materials may be more expensive.  But it is not just the green aspect.  You also need to consider the small form factor, and the customized boards necessary to build this.  Don't play smoke and mirrors and make the price tag solely about the green aspects of this.  That is just foolish.<br><br>And please, someone provide a link to a computer of similar size and specs for $250 as NK claims.  Can't?  Thought so.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bully]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bully  do U even know what U're getting for those 499? No? Thought so, I see last years tech and there isnt any special material mentioned. So...U still want that link? But first read the press release (last part)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[At first glance I thought this was an external hard drive, oops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[OOOOOh looks nice and compact. Plus low energy consumption. Might get one for my parents. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[medicmechanic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there any way to bitstream HD audio out of ANY of the newer nettops?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palehorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@palehorse <br>While this has the form factor of a Nettop it's packin an Intel ULV NOT an Atom processor so I would guess it has the horsepower.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ArhcAngel <br>it's not a matter of horsepower.  Bitstreaming untouched HD audio is a capability limited to a very select few component options these days.  There are a few PCI soundcards that can do it, but they've mostly been usurped by specific CPU or video chipsets that can do it.  AFAIK, only the Clarkdale intel CPU and the ATI 5xxx series can handle it, and I haven't seen ANY of the newer "htpc" nettops offer either of those.<br><br>I won't bother with a htpc these days that can't handle bitstreamed HD audio from ripped blurays, so my only option remains building my own rig... :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palehorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@palehorse  <br><br>Why is building your own rig a bad thing?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Beef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@archkron <br>building one isn't a big problem, but the TV-mountable form factor is tough to match, which is why I've been looking for a nettop capable of  bitstreaming HD audio for a while now...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palehorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[me want, when is it out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tehslax <br>nvm found it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one not understanding why these are more expensive than similar netbooks? It's sort of like the opposite of the notebook/desktop pricing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SilentStryk09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SilentStryk09<br>the CPU isnt an ATOM<br>there is one with an ATOM, its price is $349 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SilentStryk09 yea, and for $500, you can get a netbook with keyboard, camera and screen with similar performance that runs on less than 1/2 the power... still, for a desktop internet browser (appliance)- rather than something portable like a netbook; this looks cool. I agree with others that it looks a lot like a previous version of a WD Mybook black.... with that the move to very low power consumption, material conserving, space saving computers is a good move by all accounts; especially if the digital divide is soon to be bridged, granting billions of people access to consume computers who currently only rock a radio or less. <br><br>The information age is bound to proliferate into the developing world; and if that is the case, the equipment should follow this kind of model where less is more. <br><br>As for price; what can you expect- Viewsonic is not exactly a big PC maker; to really leverage the buying power, they need big volume, and as of yet, this device has only nitchesch market appeal to a very small segment of consumers will to drop 1/2G$ on something with these kind of specs. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they made it monitor mountable this would be perfect for a dorm. (or other tiny place, lol)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SniPerfidy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SniPerfidy read the press release.<br><br>"...mounted to the back of an LCD monitor with the included VESA® mount kit"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tmarks11]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tmarks11  Silly mortal! I don't read press releases, lol. You would think they would have put that in the original article... it's an awesome feature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SniPerfidy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does it have a PCI-e slot for a Nvidia GeForce GTX 480? :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FriskyQ32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FriskyQ32 <br>Yeah, it's actually got 3 for a 3 way SLI :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bluephoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SilentStryk09 In this case they use ULV processors which cost more (and are more powerful) than Atom processors. That said, I still think $499 is expensive. You can get a more powerful desktop for that price easily. (but I guess you pay for the form-factor to some degree)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tosvus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tosvus <br>(but I guess you pay for the form-factor to some degree)<br><br>There ya' go!<br><br>Nice to take on the road too. <br><br>I actually stayed at a Hampton Inn last week that had a flat screen HDTV and WiFi. :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[I recently helped an elderly client upgrade from his buggy WIndows 95 computer that he used for basic e-mailing and web browsing on dial-up. The one he liked the most at the store happened to have a quad-core AMD with 6gb of DDR3 RAM and a 1tb HDD. I'd say this nettop would be a much better choice for his needs since what he got was way overkill.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Corlatan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[And why the mention of the situation in the Gulf?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[August]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hikeskool Engadget loves buzz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ion?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[netsql]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@netsql No, I think the reasoning is that "at least its not Atom." ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dshark  <br><br>Ion is crap, not necessarily nVidia's fault.  I had high expectations for Ion 2 and now am reluctantly looking for an alternative.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool, but I got an Asus desktop 8 gigs, Quad core, and terabyte hard drive for the same price.... this might be good for hooking up to the tv but I think I'll stick with something bigger for regular use. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[FINALLY!<br><br>Hope this works so I can permanently disconnect my laptop from my HDTV.<br><br>Net boxes are all a joke IMO. This looks very very enticing. It's pretty too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rickay<br><br>It's pretty cheap to make your own HTPC these days (especially if you ignore the case aesthetics).  Cheaper than buying this thing.  I just ordered from NewEgg:<br><br>AMD Sempron 140 (unlocks to a dual core w/the right mobo) - $33<br><br>Gigabyte mobo (can unlock Sempron, has Radeon HD 4250 with HDMI) - $65 with promo code<br><br>2x1GB dual channel DDR2-800 - $50<br><br>I cannibalized an old computer for the case, power supply, and hard drive, though I also initially priced a configuration that included all of those and came in under $250.  (I have a Windows Media Center remote already - those can be had for ~$15.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Realityism]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems to me that the Acer Revo R3610 would be better computer at a much lower price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Evans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jay Evans It might be, but:<br><br>1) We don't know what the REAL street price of this product is.<br>2) We don't have detailed specs<br>3) Remember the Revo is using netbook components, and this does not appear to.<br><br>An atom processor I believe costs OEMs $27 right now, so obviously you put a better Core ULV in there and the like and the prices are going to go up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br><br>Type Intel Celeron 743 / 1.3 GHz <br><br>Mainboard<br>Chipset Type Mobile Intel GS40 Express <br>Data Bus Speed 800 MHz <br><br>RAM<br>Installed Size 2 GB <br>Technology DDR2 SDRAM <br><br>Storage Controller<br>Type Serial ATA - integrated <br><br>Storage<br>Hard Drive 1 x 250 GB - standard - Serial ATA-150 <br><br>Expansion / Connectivity<br>Interfaces 1 x audio / video - HDMI <br>1 x display / video - DVI-Analog/Digital <br>1 x microphone - mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm <br>1 x headphones - output - mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm <br>4 x Hi-Speed USB - 4 pin USB Type A <br><br>Operating System / Software<br>OS Provided Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium <br><br>No keyboard or Mouse<br><br>For $329 I'll take the Acer with the Atom 330 and ION. Wireless Keyboard/ Mouse and 802.11n <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Evans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/18/viewsonic-outs-energy-efficient-earth-friendly-vot125-nettop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jay Evans  I agree with you. :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EbookLover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2010 8:44PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
