<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[when will the "Nano-ray" discs hit the stores? wish i don't have to wait for 10 years...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[2her0ck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@2her0ck  I wished that they had made the drives smaller when Blu-Ray hit - the same size as MiniDVD at most and it could hold 15GB just like HD-DVD. Current drives take up way too much space and encourages netbook manufacturers to just leave them out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Parody of a Microtard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 7:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@2her0ck <br>It better be at least 10 years, I just bought all these blu-rays!<br>Even if the players are backwards compatible, my OCD wouldn't like having two types of media on my shelf.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoJew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@2her0ck <br><br>"Nano-ray"<br><br>Nice name idea, lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kromatik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA["Nice earrings ma'am."<br><br>"Earrings? Bitch, these are flash drives! I got seasons 1-36 of LOST on the left one alone!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunda Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ThundaChunky <br>hilarious, even though the series finale to lost aired this past Sunday. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GenoMalice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@genomalice :'( why did it have to end]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@genomalice  <br>Yeah, but by the time this comes out, Lost will be in the 36th season of the reboot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zangetsu2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't be surprised if it was called Red-Ray for 2K and 4K resolution movies.<br><br>Why Red-Ray?<br>Because of this: <a href="http://www.red.com/accessories/digital_storage/" rel="nofollow">http://www.red.com/accessories/digital_storage/</a><br>RED FTW]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imagine the amount of p...<br><br>Very impressive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sebiiau]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sebiiau <br>I would use this to hold all my porn. I would need about 6 crystals though.<br><br>No wait, I just double checked... Make that 7 crystals.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[9ft.midget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[THIS is what I'm skipping Blu-Ray for!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlimSpaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, 30-50 TB data discs.  With these, we could finally put an end to magnetic tape drives.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dante of the Inferno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dante of the Inferno No, magnetic storage will still be used where re-writing is necessary.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlimSpaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SlimSpaceman  Don't need to rewrite data at those densities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sortius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SlimSpaceman  <br><br>I said TAPE, not hard disc drives: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/19/japanese-gurus-unveil-50tb-magnetic-tape-cartridges-are-officia/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/19/japanese-gurus-unveil-50tb-magnetic-tape-cartridges-are-officia/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dante of the Inferno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dante of the Inferno <br><br>As with everything from Red its vaporware.  The company has a million computer renderings.<br><br>Also, it'll be over-priced, their CF module costs $500, something that should cost $5.<br><br>Also, Red-ray doesn't use any new optical technology, they just have a different codec.<br><br>Besides, the name is stupid technically.  Blu-ray is "blu" because it uses blue-violet spectrum of light (405 nm laser), a "RED" ray is basically infrared light (~650nm).  Basically its calling itself a DVD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm having trouble with the math.  Blu-Ray is 405nm.  405nm / 5nm = 81x increase in data density, not 1000x.<br><br>So a 5nm technology on a 12cm disc should be able to hold about 2TB, and [since 8cm discs hold about 30% of the data of a 12cm disc,] an 8cm disc should hold about 600GB.<br><br>1000x or 81x, either way, it would be nice to take this opportunity to switch to 8cm discs as the standard seeing as how 600GB should suffice well for the distribution of any individual production.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[like laser disc large!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MVMNT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MVMNT <br>laser discs never had much data capacity. but in terms of physical capacity, you can almost fit a while pizza on them!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andres]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope burning speeds increase just as much (an increase should happen due to the density but the question is how much). If you're stuck at Bluray speeds of 36MB/s it will take you 16days to burn that 50TB disc!<br><br>I'm still waiting for that spherical storage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Schmich <br><br>I'm sure they would resort to multiple read/write heads or even an array of heads at that point.<br><br>At least, that's where i think it's headed.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm... and what's about the laser needed to read the data?  I don't know of any laser diode which is capable of emitting such a small beam...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[süli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@s <br><br>That's what *really smart* she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunda Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you need that much space to store your porn collection, the size of your genitals must equal the size of the crystals. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[B3astofthe3ast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@B3astofthe3ast <br><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/images/primary/crystal-cave-1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/images/primary/crystal-cave-1.jpg</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andres]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weirdo557  Makes me think the "size of crystals" comment should have been specified...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrFluffyThing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA["Ahh, nanotechnology -- making our lives easier, one NANOscopic crystal or tube at a time."<br><br>-fix'd]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaiGurrenKittan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 3:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[and how's the lifespan gonna be?<br>i wouldn't wanna find my multitera collection of porn corrupt a month after burning]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joppe karhunen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Japs ..Continue Rocking Ppl... You guys have made real difference to world of Electronics.... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoPhyt3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd love to have all TV Shows  in Full HD released since 1980 on two  of this disks (and two backups safely stored elsewhere) :)<br><br>and a drem is to have ONE DISK with complete LOST series in IMAX HD format/resolution + all other verisons Super Hi-Vision, 4K, 2K, 1080p, etc :)<br><br>And of course... this disks should have a long lifespan (20+ years at least)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damir Secki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DamirSecki I think you'll find most shows from 1980 aren't available in HD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 10:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Khav  <br><br>If it was recorded with 35mm film, it shouldn't be a problem (re)releasing it in HD.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@joquarky  winner!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[howardchief]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@joquarky  I may be wrong, but I've always thought that TV shows weren't recorded on 35mm film.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 11:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Khav  <br><br>Star Trek was recorded on 35mm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 27th 2010 12:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Optical?  Seriously?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 4:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[either that's a very small petri dish or those crystals in the photo aren't 5 nm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weeandystheman<br><br>Chunks of crystals, methinks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhuzhu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally something that can keep up with my p*rn collection]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeNg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you meant "1,000 times the data of Blu-ray at the same _size_", not density, because the whole point of those crystals is that they allow for much higher density.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 5:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yhea, backup all my blu-rays on one disc xD ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeviantmacG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 6:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see none of that added hydrogen in the molecular formula.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhuzhu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 8:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@apache2<br><br>Sounds painful, what with the sharp edges and all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhuzhu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[first and formost this technology is amazing... you will need new hardware for this... you cheap bastards who expect a firmware date to fix this your wrong.... you will be the ones who get the update then try to burn the max capacity and have slow speeds cause your hardware is outdated... like a windows xp certified pc running on windows 7.... usb 3.0 and a nice quad core processor with ddr3 ram will solve this... dont use old hardware and complain]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[big nazty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can see this as a way to make disks mini sized, as any larger at that density would have massive jitter IMO. And as for write speeds, i'm sure its limited to how fast the lazer diode can turn on and off (but that's a guess)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imagine - by 2015 we will have 100TB of storage in a PS4 or an SHV drive (don't know what it is going to be called) and about 500GB in phones!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FuturismRave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA["5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines". Ahem, I think optical discs are too large as it is... Engadget, you may want to rephrase your title....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tosvus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is only the beginning...<br><br>Imagine how the HDD/SSD World will respond to this. . .<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n0rp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 5nm crystals could lead to vastly larger optical discs, mighty fine time machines]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/26/5nm-crystals-could-lead-to-vastly-larger-optical-discs-mighty-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Source article says....<br><br>DVDs and Blu-ray discs are made using alloys with germanium and other rare metals. The price of the compound discovered by researchers is about one-hundredth of the price, and is safe to handle.<br><br>WOW ! :D   ...so 5 TB ish at only $ 0.0025  ...should be $ 0.00025 ...but that's even more impossible practially...<br><br>cool so then everyone can afford 4K 3D Storage ! :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[n0rp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 26th 2010 7:49PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
