<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[stupid intel, just include support already, as if it isn't going to take off! Cheapskates!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 6:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajj3 Hey, that logo looks famili- oh.... wait a minute]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaldinggreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 6:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajj3 yeah who knew 64bit processors took off]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Coke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 6:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Coke  <br>hasnt apple only added 64 bit processors to their products recently?<br>my friend was bragging about how amazing it is when i shocked him with the fact that windows devices have had it for ages<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HoldenMccrotch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HoldenMccrotch  <br>Are you serious? If you're talking about the hardware (processors), Apple uses the same processors that any computer (PC) uses.<br>In fact, inside the aluminium body, it's exactly the same as any other computer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xsacha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajj3 <br>Google has MANY friends, I think Apple will learn the lesson the HARD WAY.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beatnik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 8:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hajj3 <br>Exactly. First thing I thought when I read this was: "oh, so Intel is going to be late to the game, again, to add hw acceleration that's probably sub-standard and overdue, compared to the competition".<br><br>I mean, how long did it take Intel to release a freaking GPU that decodes high-bitrate H264 in hardware... It's only since the very last GMA chips that you can actually play H264 video on an Atom-based system. Which is particularly ridiculous if you imagine that a puny Nvidia Gefore 2 MX could already do it through purevideo 2 years ago, and still had processing power to spare to enhance the image though all kinds of filters. I'm not making this up.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel: If everyone else does it then so will we.<br>Awesome way to push technology to new heights, Intel! If everybody was like you...oh...wait...they are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 6:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought intel was soppised 2 b an innovative leader in silicon? I guess Google has taken the job! I bet Steve Jobs WILL Learn the HARD WAY... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SdotproducTionZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[just wait till steve and company decide to make their own x86 chip]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel mulling WebM hardware acceleration in Atom CE4100 chip]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/intel-mulling-webm-hardware-acceleration-in-atom-ce4100-chip/</guid><description><![CDATA[..what a bad joke. Instead of putting a decent graphic chip able to decode h.264 inside pinetrail, they badly neutered the 3150.<br><br>And they even forbid nVidia to build a more decent chipset for the N4x0 and the new Dxxx. Real assholes to now come bragging with 2x1080p hardware decode capabilties.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[user0938]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 1:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
