<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is madness!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexpeegs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs <br><br>They can't just "completely replace" Google with Bing. Isn't that a sort of anti-trust tactic?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>Orrrrrr... apple could be unveiling their own search engine to compete with google and microsoft! tada!<br><br>any creative guesses on what it'll be called?? iSearch? iAmApple? iWunderbar?<br><br>?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Kapoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs <br><br>This is Sparta! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Vick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is SPARTA!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eman1204]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>Bing isn't good at all. It's slow. I want a barebones search engine like google that loads as fast as possible. Also, ironically, my work has, for whatever reason, blocked Bing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo  <br>iSpy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[iBing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs<br><br>Colbert is the man.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@r34p3r  They can change the default option, no big deal. You can still Google, but you have to type google.com or bookmark it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dementedacademic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 12:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs <br>This is panic, actually. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ark_v2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs no, THIS IS SPARTAN!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FuturismRave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 4:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@r34p3r  <br><br>Er... what? You think Apple now has a monopoly on Smartphones??<br><br>DAMMIT<br><br>you friggin Android queers are insane... a few days ago you were saying Apple was in 3rd place cuz of a damn survey, now they can't change their phone's OS without approval from the Feds?!??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs Apple perhaps realized that Google is trying to kill every device they made for this year, starting with its iPhone, and now to the iPad (Verizon Google Tablet) ...  So this madness is happening. <a href="http://j.mp/google-chrome-verizon-tablet" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/google-chrome-verizon-tablet</a><br><br>Although, everything is still a rumor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[moseylisa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techee44  for the love of god, COMMA SPLICE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo  <br><br>Spotlight anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techman89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs microsoft and apple.  together at last.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who would ever choose Bing over Google? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS1495]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 <br><br>The people who USE Bing I use Bing Maps over Google maps all the time, It truly is superior.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolaaron88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 What has two thumbs and would choose Bing over Google?  This guy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeEcho5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 Seems their bitter (or whatever word you'd like to use) and want out from anything Google. Which is stupid because Google is the best search engine and has great Maps and Navigation.<br>This is a dumb choice...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EggoEspada]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 Me! <br><br>Bing's live traffic is totally better. <br>OH WAIT I mean their topographic maps are better<br>UH I mean their sea floor maps are better <br>WAIT THAT'S NOT IT I MEANT their bicycle route maps are better<br>...ER I meant their public transit maps are better <br>JUST KIDDING I meant their...uh<br><br>Oh yeah, bird's eye view! That's it! Take that Google Maps, you suck!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 <br><br>I agree. At least the web search portion is clearly inferior. As a website owner I notice that Bing takes ages to index my site. The way it displays search engine results is also flawed. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fanboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 I use both. I like Bing's background pictures and stuff. But when I want more detail search results with all the BS Bing filters out, I use Google. If this happens, Google's in for a shit show.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Konga068]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br>"which is better:<br><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=lakers" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=lakers</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=lakers" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=lakers</a><br>hint: one has an informative recent history of games, playable video, and looks great. the other has nearly no info and has a clip art basketball."<br><br>He makes sense at least.<br><br>PS. There is a reason colleges and universities frown upon looking up research on Google. Its because of the way google brings up your search results...which really isn't as great of a way as google fans put it out to be.<br><br>Most people are stuck on Google because thats the best thing they have had in years and don't want to risk going to a different engine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>Yeah, because everyone is going to take your opinion seriously based on your previous posts.<br><br>Troll, troll, troll your boat...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS1495]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  i don't see how the results Bing gave are any better then the Google results.  But that was an easy search.  Try something a little less specific as many searches are. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 10:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br>interesting. i tried my own variation, and searched "tigers" since i am a detroit tigers fan and am currently in detroit for the weekend. check the results:<br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=tigers&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=tigers&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a</a><br><br><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=tigers&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=tigers&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk</a>=<br><br>did google automatically pick the detroit tigers because of my location? I wonder if the results would be different if i was back in chicago?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jawman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=search+engines&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk=&sc=8-13" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=search+engines&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk=&sc=8-13</a><br><br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=search+engines&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CPdxCjYQATPHUHJTuzASs6pieBQAAAKoEBU_QPZJl" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=search+engines&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CPdxCjYQATPHUHJTuzASs6pieBQAAAKoEBU_QPZJl</a><br><br>Which is better (hint: Google wins)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@abedinthehouse  <br>interesting. i tried my own variation, and searched "tigers" since i am a detroit tigers fan and am currently in detroit for the weekend. check the results:<br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=tigers&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=tigers&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a</a><br><br><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=tigers&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=tigers&go=&form=QBLH&qs=n&sk</a>=<br><br>did google automatically pick the detroit tigers because of my location? I wonder if the results would be different if i was back in chicago?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jawman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jawman  <br>don't know how i managed to double post. user error, sorry :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jawman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>Bing's searches were clearly not better (not to me at least)<br><br>Look, I am not a Google fanboy, but I really do prefer the layout and look of Google, that's just my opinion.  Are you going to try and stop me?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS1495]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>i didn't search "lakers"<br><br>i searched what someone else suggested, which was search engines. And i went to the lakers thing you posted. there was no clip art. however, tigers brings up pictures of tigers, and google brings up tiger's scores. duh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  This is an actual search i did once when a restaurant near my house called Monk's was forced to change it;s name due to a law suit. <br><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=triple+cheese+sandwich+tharpe+st" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=triple+cheese+sandwich+tharpe+st</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=triple+cheese+sandwich+tharpe+st" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=triple+cheese+sandwich+tharpe+st</a><br> I was trying to find the menu and the normal search for monks was not getting me any results so I searched for a menu item and the st the resaurant is on.  the new name of the restaurant is wells brothers.  Notice how The first result on Google is EXACTLY what I am looking for.  Not sure what bing is doing here]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>What? No? Bing brings up 2 wiki links, dogpile, and something "dogvista" it doesn't even bring up bing. google brings up Dogpile, Bing (yep), and then the wiki pages. its obviously superior. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>You're an idiot, a troll, and your wrong. GTFO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br><br>No, I do know. It's pretty obvious that google's algorithm is better than bing's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 <br>I'm waiting for the Ask Jeeves app.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[H264]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2<br><br>Bing doesn't do well with technical searches, or anything that is more rare or harder to find.  Microsoft even admits this:<br><br><a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Search-Engines/Microsoft-Ignored-the-Long-Tail-in-Search-Bing-Boss-Says-396023/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Search-Engines/Microsoft-Ignored-the-Long-Tail-in-Search-Bing-Boss-Says-396023/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nobled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[K I'm an idiot.  the links I posted is probably gonna give you guys totally different results then I got because of location, But try it with a restaurant near you.  You'll see what i mean]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[edu3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Edobe  <br><br>No, it worked with me. You were right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techee44]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techee44  <br><br>I love that Google doesn't even come up on the bing search.  Kind of strange given it is one of, if not thee, most visited sites on the web.  Whereas bing is #2 on Google's results.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bacchus027]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 28th 2010 11:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 I get better search results with Bing.  Downrank if you want but that's what I see.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[The things some of the users on this site argue about blows my mind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br>people would really take your opinion so much more seriously if you didn't have bing in your av.  i will concede to you that bing maps is better than google maps, but this is not what the article is about.  the article is talking about the double tap home screen, which is a web search.  bing web search does have its advantages, but google definitely is the superior search engine.<br><br>from what i have seen from all of your posts, you are a troll.  i can also tell that you have been banned once already.  stop with your blatant trolling and maybe you will be able to command some respect from other commenters.  i'm also fairly sure you don't know every end of how search engines work, so don't talk like you do.  stop posting like everyone is attacking you.  most people, like myself attack you because you, sir, are an asshole when you post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[condimentstation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Becauseitsnotgoogle2  <br>"how is that "obviously superior"<br><br>obviously the search results will be slightly different, its a different algorithm. I dont think you know how search engines work."<br><br>Really? Would you care to explain then o' mighty troll? <br><br>Honestly- FUCK OFF. You wonder why Engadget closed the comments. If you need further explanation, just fucking BING "troll" and read through a couple results.<br>Stop ruining the comment section. I wanna read what other people have to say. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Special Agent Steve (PSN AATroop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 1:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Special Agent Steve<br><br>like really? Are we really fighting/debating over Bling and google? Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the Internet connect to the same place? And both engines are quick so WTF? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@neoand12  <br>It's the matter of principle. And the principle is, a troll is just being a prick.    He purposely lacks the conscious to just agree with other companies. I don't like Apple- however, I still have an ipod. Why? Actually I don't know why. But I have one. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Special Agent Steve (PSN AATroop)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 1:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Special Agent Steve <br><br>I actually think that the ones calling others trolls have the problem here. Just because the ones that like Bing don't agree with you!! Grow up. It's subjective. Nobody disagree with anyone because you'll be a troll. It's pathetic and it's ruining Engadget]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marklitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/28/microsoft-and-apple-still-in-talks-for-bing-iphone-search-option/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DS1495 <br>Me]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nn4458]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 29th 2010 8:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
