<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll stick with my GTX 480 thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[betafrog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bender the great <br>may i present to you the mother of all current video cards as an alternative option<br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161311&cm_re=5970-_-14-161-311-_-Product" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161311&cm_re=5970-_-14-161-311-_-Product</a><br>:D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  You could if it supported CUDA and 3D Vision]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[betafrog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bender the great, show me a useful application for home use that takes advantage of CUDA?<br>(Nvidia 3D Vision = ATI Eyefinity)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bender the great <br>It still is the most powerful video card out there and while it does not support cuda or 3D Vision   it does support openGL and 3D monitor and eyefinity.   If you need cuda and the like then wait i would of waited a bit for nvidia's dual gpu card  which is due out soon if history repeats it self ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SSD <br>Alot of software to create DVDs now uses cuda  to encode your video to proper format. That's probably the best home-use at the moment.<br><br>On the other hand, it also works miracles it me on an almost daily basis for my video editing work in Premiere Pro.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Failbait]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[ 739 umm no thank u ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NOT ME]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  <br><br>when a 480 can run as good as a 5970... your point is moot.<br><br><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1709275" rel="nofollow">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1709275</a>  <br>vs<br><a href="http://service.futuremark.om/compare?3dmv=2128373" rel="nofollow">http://service.futuremark.om/compare?3dmv=2128373</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fozzy Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fozzy Bear <br>  You must be new to this PC game   cause a senthetic benchmark vs. real world benchmark   are two different things.( besides the 480 scores are inflated because of  physx   which nvidia does not allow on ATI cards)<br>Compare Frame rates in games for a better comparison on which is a better "video" card]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  <br><br>Look, I know this is hard for you seeing that you went out on a limb claiming the GPU universe revolves around the 5970. But let me help you get your planets in order -- since you are no authority on the matter.<br><br>1. There isn't going to be a dual GF100 based card. If they release one, it'll be towards the end of the year and it will be a GF104 variant at the same 40nm process.<br>2. Your 5970 is $700 and is largely out of stock.<br>3. Regarding Vantage, yeah, it's synthetic, however, as all smart enthusiasts know, there is no GPU score advantage given to GPUs with PhysX, it's CPU/overall score only.<br><br>So, to recap, the links I provided highlight the GPU scores where a 480 beats a 5970 as it's own game -- that is, the Sapphire/ATI sponsored 3dMark Vantage.<br><br>When 480s start beating 5970s in synth benchmarks for $200 cheaper and they already can match a 5970 in about 50% of the most popular games currently on the market. I'd say that you're the one slightly misinformed about the matter especially posting it in a GTX 465 article.<br><br>I'd have linked to new benches, but most haven't reposted/updated their articles against the new 257.15 beta drivers -- because, well, they're still beta.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fozzy Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bender the great <br><br>I shall wait for the inevitable launch of GTX 490/495, which will most likely feature two 448 core chips and 2-3 GB of memory. History always repeats itself. Always.<br><br>PS: I wish they made all the cores available. Each Fermi chip has 16 x 32 cores. The GTX 480 has 15 x 32 lines available. GTX 470 has 14 x 32 lines available, and this new GTX 465 has 11 x 32 lines available.<br><br>If only the GTX 495 had two 512-core chips and 3 GB of memory, then the 5970 has nothing on it. The power consumption on the other hand would be beastly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kapanak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fozzy Bear  <br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=5970&x=0&y=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=5970&x=0&y=0</a> <br>ALL in stock  <br><br><a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/38046-nvidia-gets-a-big-advantage-in-3dmark-vantage-because-of-physx-on-gpu-tech" rel="nofollow">http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/38046-nvidia-gets-a-big-advantage-in-3dmark-vantage-because-of-physx-on-gpu-tech</a><br>or<br><a href="http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=7198" rel="nofollow">http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=7198</a><br><br>as for the $200 price difference   well  two 480's would cas more than one 5970<br><br><br>as for smartness    the majority of the [H]orde begs to differ. if you didn't understand then don't even bother replying]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet <br><br>2x 480 smokes 5970 and 2x 5870s. Worth the difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fozzy Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fozzy Bear  <br><br>"smokes". Indeed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SSD  <br><br>CoreAVC does, Just Cause 2.;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wag]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2010 1:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  lol - that newegg link isn't helping ATI much - first two posts were all about how HIS and how they had to RMA their cards after running them briefly.<br><br>At least I know with EVGA/Nvidia the cards are going to work out of the box!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrNz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2010 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[yea considering the power consumption if you've got a year old built system working at a good rate chances are getting a GTX 465 could mean reaching a little deeper into the savings account for a better PSU.<br><br>this could make the 5850 a slightly better alternative but than again Fermi for under 300 sounds good]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zylam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still looks like ATI's got Nvidia beat on this one (for gamers atleast).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tobsmonster2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[That thing looks built. Wouldn't want to upset it in any way shape or form.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[buoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@buoy see now, my first though was "Mmmmmm that thing is built"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrtcwlvl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@buoy WTF does he mean?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bvds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Prices seem to high on all the new chips from both companies. Where are the mid-ranged stuff?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrScope]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[quote for tomshardware<br>Honestly, I’m not sure what Nvidia was thinking with this one. Surely, its competitive analysis team ran these very same benchmarks and found the GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 5830 trading blows. Surely, the same group of folks hopped online and saw Radeon HD 5830s selling for $220, going as low as $199 with rebates. How, then, did they decide that $279 was a good starting point for suggested pricing?<br><br>With Radeon HD 5850s available at $289, just $10 more, that’s unquestionably the route we’d take today.<br><br><br>how is this positive engadget?  It performs worse than a ATI 5830 and cost 50 dollars more?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet <br>Sure thing. I didn't even bother reading any other reviews.<br>Picking up the HD5850 over this is a no-brainer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bvds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet I addressed what you're talking about in my nVNews review of the EVGA GTX 265 SC.  At stock and overclocked speeds it went up against a Sapphie Radeon HD 5830 (at stock and overclocked speeds).  Editors, if you wouldn't mind, please add the nVNews review to your list.  It's more of a "real world" review that shows the performance of cards like these in a system that is not top-of-the-line.  Most value-oriented enthusiast gamers don't have a an i7 or an x6 cpu, and video cards that only show a card's capability with zero cpu limitation can be misleading.<br><br>In the interest of time we (nVNews) decided to publish the review in our forums rather than on the front page.  I may be adding more benchmark results at a later time.<br><br>Link:  <a href="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=151518" rel="nofollow">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=151518</a><br><br>Mind you, I haven't reviewed in a few years (I'm a bit rusty, lol), and i only had 3 days to get all this info together in a semi-coherent package while hoping all the while that my rig wouldn't inadvertently blow up.<br><br>:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet And people with Crossfire capable motherboards also have the option of buying 2x5770's at that price range, which would not only use substantially less power ($ savings from lower electricity bills) but also be quite a bit faster.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdemon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ragejg  <br>I bow before you for such an great review with nice photography to boot.<br>*applause* *applause* *applause* *applause* *applause* *applause* <br><br>really that read was great. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[they need to name their graphics cards along the lines of ATI with their 3000, 4000, 5000 series. I don't understand all these nVidia graphics card names, with GTX, GTS and so on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dedparrot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dedparrot <br>gtx = extreme<br>gts = super<br>gt = standard<br>no letters just numbers = very basic<br><br>simple enough  :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dedparrot <br>although i agree it would be simpler to name the high end like 480,481,ect. the mid range 450,etc. the low end 420,etc and the integrated  400,etc]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too expensive. Too hot. Too power hungry. Nothing changed on the way down from the nuclear furnace that is the GTX480/470.<br><br>Should AMD really drop the HD6xxx (southern islands) series, a hybrid of cypress (HD5xxx) and next years completely new architecture (northern islands), onto the market this year, the outlook for nvidia in the gaming business will be grim.<br><br>On the bright side, they seem to make a good buck with Thermi as a HPC product. Undoubtly the intended market for this design...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahumbug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bahumbug, The HPC market is not adapting to the Fermi either due to the same problems  - to hot and to power hungry. SGI just announced last week that it won't built a system around the Fermi. Instead they are concentrating on Intel's Atom which has much lower power requirements. SGI is stuffing 10,000 Atom CPU's onto one 19" server rack which would be impossible to do with Nvidia's Fermi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stefan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA["...something to consider if you're rolling along with an old school 400W PSU in your rig."<br>>:I *stares at PSU*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HikaKao]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fermi  = Fail, no matter how they roll it...<br><br>I hope their next design will be released soon and be a awesome or nvidia will go the way of 3dfx... not undeserved, though...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wy didnt they drop the GeForce name for Fermi and stop all this stupid numbering business going on? Its getting silly now]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MVMNT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[IT looks a little plasticy, like those Star Wars lightsabers everyone bought at Wal-Mart.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nod Flenders]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[NVIDIA must be as nervous as a virgin in a brothel. ATi are just wiping the floor with them, especially considering how the 5830 pricing is now VERY competitive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@richb93 <br><br>why would you be nervous? you're paying for them to handle it all for you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fozzy Bear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny how Anandtech Review was not included in this article, when they almost always are included in all other articles of this sort. Biased much?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gaiden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets not forget u only need one card for triple monitor support on a 5xxx series card.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unrated]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is an ugly card...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's with the plastic looking crap on it...really?<br>I got a 5870 last time I had to upgrade, previously had a gtx260. Lookin at this fine example of crap from nvidia makes me not regret having to deal with some ati driver bs. nvidia...why you failing to see no one wants a heat hoven in the form of a gfx card? why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[I pity the fool that buys this card. I mean, if you don't have i5/i7, it's okay, you're CPU limited. But if you have an i5 or i7 and you play demanding games, you need at least the 470. It is faster in more games, without a doubt, than the 5850. Go read all the reviews Engadget linked for the 470, write down all the games, and write down which GPU was faster. The vast majority will be the 470. And with such immature drivers and limited tessellation available in games right now, it's performance lead will only grow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Smurf Not sure about the 470 (which is their best card) beating the 5850 but there other CPUs on the market which will not reach their limit when gaming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RampantNinja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2010 10:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can it play Crysis 2?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, you got to do something with the lower bin chips that don't make the grade to be a 470.<br><br>Still think you'd have to be a dyed-in-the-wool nVidia fan to want one over a 5xxx series Radeon though.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've largely ignored the video card market the last few years ago so it's surprising to see the roles have changed so much.  A few years ago, nVidia was the top dog and ATI was about a half-step behind.  Now it seems the situation has completely reversed.  Seems ATI has the edge in performance, price-performance and wattage departments?<br><br>I'm curious...what happened to nvidia?  Or conversely, what happened to ATI?  Seems nvidia's latest and greatest chips demand far more power than ATI's chips at a given performance level.  Is this simply ATI benefiting from AMD's experience?  Or did nvidia lose key designers and screw the pooch with their latest designs?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arcasinky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 31st 2010 10:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 rounds up mostly positive reviews]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/31/nvidia-geforce-gtx-465-rounds-up-some-positive-reviews/</guid><description><![CDATA[@arcasinky simple, ATi have been cleverly designing their chips whereas nvidia have been brute forcing theirs; all we are seeing now is that brute forcing catching up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RampantNinja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2010 10:56PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
