http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/ Engadget Comments for Intel 'Oak Trail' is headed for tablets in early 2011 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
Chrome OS and Android , thus the google label.]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
yes, I know. but if you recall Chrome has been a little bit shoved on the back burner and not released on anything really . . . I was hoping there would be some kind of official statement about it, you know?]]>Jun 1st 2010 2:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
The arguments are tired. RISC is more efficient, it eats too much power and blah blah blah.

RISC was always better but they never did shit in the desktop era. Dont count out Intel. They got the money and the talent.]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
Exactly. Moorestown is probably at least as efficient as the likes of Snapdragon and Tegra. Otherwise Intel would not even bother with it. Funny thing is, if Oak Trail is coming at the end of 2010/beginning of 2011, when will we see Medfield, the 32 nm Atom SoC that combines all of Moorestown into one board smaller than a credit card?]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
Apple is garbage. ARM is a good cpu for mobile platforms because of battery life. Intel simply is not there yet with battery power.

The advantage with x86 is that it simply is more powerful even at the same die size as ARM.

Theres a plus and minus to both architectures.

At this point I'd prefer to go with ARM on a mobile platform like a phone.

But anytime I need a REAL COMPUTER I prefer an x86 cpu; and one that is preferably from Intel.

Intel needs to get its act together with their internal gpu's as well, ARM's ability to integrate a gpu core is a huge advantage. Intel has no idea what its doing with graphics and needs to buy Nvidia instead of continuing to fight with them.

I'd love a Windows 7 tablet right about now though!]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
Honestly, it is sad that I will not have a tablet to take notes in grad school come sept.]]>Jun 1st 2010 1:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
I'm suddenly like one of those senior citizens who doesn't know how to use a mouse and doesn't know where the on/off switch for their cellphone is. Are these Google directions or something? Is this better then a 486 DX/66?]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/]]>Jun 1st 2010 12:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
The biggest power drain in a "tablet" is the display, not the CPU.]]>Jun 1st 2010 1:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
Oh, right, you just made that up...]]>Jun 1st 2010 2:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/Jun 1st 2010 12:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/intel-oak-trail-is-headed-for-tablets-in-early-2011/
2011? Aw.]]>Jun 1st 2010 1:45AM