http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/ Engadget Comments for Sharp plunges headfirst into 3D market with LV-series Quattron TVs, Blu-ray DVRs http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
Technically and logically it should be a gimmick, however, it works, you need to see it in person.

I'm guessing it virtually creates the RGB pixel during image processing and then recreates it in truer detail in the RGBY pixel.

It doesn't matter either that our eyes perceive under the RGB spectrum, our RGB spectrum is much more accurate and natural. Simply adding more sub-pixel colours such as this, the TV itself to recreates more exact colours, then our eyes can recreate those exact colours quite closely.

Just because our eyes work under RGB and our TVs work under it, doesn't mean that it's a perfect match, it doesn't work like that, while our eyes use RGB, we see the whole pixel as one colour and our eyes will reproduce that, but make that colour more precise with the yellow and we well then perceive that colour using.

It's a garbage in garbage out thing, if yellow can make the more precise colours on a TV then our eyes will pick that up using our more precise RGB perception. Yellow is limted in the RGB spectrum, this sub-pixel will help.

Vision is an extremely complicated process and It's not just about a narrow band of lightwaves, this also helps brightness, transparency, contrast and lighting.]]>Jun 2nd 2010 7:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
Who the hell is going to pay $5,000 for a tv that shows blue and red colors, or colors that look dark and messed up?

Rich people, thats who. ALL 50 of them.

3D is fail, thin OLED is fail, but it made HD tvs prices drop, so KEEP EM COMIN BOYS.

OH I HAVE AN IDEA!

Lets make LAZER TVS popular!

YESS MORE MONEY KNOCKED OFF OF A PERFECT HD TV!]]>Jun 2nd 2010 1:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
What annoys me is that it isn't even 3D! It is more like slightly increased depth of field..... Not so snappy though is it....]]>Jun 2nd 2010 3:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
Just a thought, correct me if I'm wrong on this, but it sounds like you haven't got even a remote idea of what you're talking about.]]>Jun 2nd 2010 10:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/I'm sorry Khav, but let me tell you
something. I'm in the likes of stores such as Best Buy, Fry's Electronics, Howards, Sears, and receive online retailers ads every day such
as tigerdirect, newegg, and circuitcity.com ads. That being said, this new technology is great, but I will never pay over $3,000.00 for
a set. Get this...I went with my neighbor and he
actually bought one of the new Samsung 3d televisions for a gob of money. I helped him install it and he said these exact words to me. " Man, i'm tired of keeping up with the Jone's. I
should have waited until the Panisonic new VT series comes out." My point? Uckapple does make some good points. Not all of them though. I have the financial resources to purchase such a system, but for what logical
reason at this point? To say I have a 3d set and there really isn't that much media to
really take advantage of the technology other than the World Cup, a few blu-rays? I think not. The bottom line here is that one more color from the Sharp Aquos is great. I saw it at the CES show this pas January. I go every year since being here on the West Coast in Cali. I would just give it a year or two for 3d period to see if the standard will take off to
be the norm in most sets in most retail stores or online retailers. Peace....]]>Jun 2nd 2010 10:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 1:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 3:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 5:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
Means it doesnt look all fuzzy like. Will just flick both eyes on and off at the same time at 60htz. Still get all the same side effects of shutterglass that some people suffer (headaches, nausea, epilepsy) just no 3d :p]]>Jun 2nd 2010 6:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Jun 2nd 2010 6:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/forefront, then look for Nvidia to have huge stronghold over not just the likes of AMD, but other television manufactures. I'll keep you all posted and let's keep our fingers crossed for universal breakthrough as this one is shaping to be. Many consumers don't take 3D seriously, but it looks like we might have a company like Nvidia and others to make you wish you had a
pair that could work with any 3D capable set. Now, let's see if the headache and pregnacy will be resolved finally. We should only hope that this will work to everyone's satisfaction. Good luck Nvidia with this project. You're either going to sink or swim. What do you all think? Peace....]]>Jun 2nd 2010 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Sorry folks. The retail universal glasses will
cost around $130.00. That's not too bad if they bundle it with a universal dongle or a movie or two.]]>Jun 2nd 2010 2:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/Sorry folks. The retail value for the
glasses will $130.00. Not too bad if they bundle in a pair of 3D movies and a universal HDMI/Component dongle of some sort. ]]>Jun 2nd 2010 2:05PM