<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Being rich has it's perks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtasi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[My dreams of a 4K 3DTV has finally come true, now once I too become rich and buy this beast I can die happy [=]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abedinthehouse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@abedinthehouse  Give it 3 months and they'll have a 153-inch model that will make your life incomplete again...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrFluffyThing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrFluffyThing  Tell me about it, I'm already getting a crew together to get rid of my 151-inch. Being rich is so hard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zero1221]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[It took more than 50 years to get from PAL/NTSC to HDTV. <br><br>Now we have these gigantic screens and we start with pixely TV all over again. *sigh* ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeKo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SeeKo  <br><br>Isn't that why it's a 4k screen?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 7:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DougieBear  <br><br>You're right. Pixely was the wrong word. Put it will be blurry again. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeKo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xtasi <br>Meh, with a pixel density of 30.46472916 - I'm disappointed, extremely. Anything less than 4K would be majorly unwatchable. <br><br>To be quite honest in a day when you can buy a smartphone with almost 300 more pixels in every single inch, this is just pathetic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fordy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[for his next trick, Mr Jobs will be fitting this resolution into the ipad 2]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jjrp123]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 3:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nerdgasm!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[8th Gamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[cool, now you can see even more zits in hi-def pr0n!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Psyclotr0n]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Psyclotr0n We call them nirples in the biz. Now we can have larger than life p0rn with these giant nirples.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BarkingGhost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[4K Blu-Ray?<br><br>Or an OC-3 piped into your home?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, can u imagine halo reach on that?!?! In 3D to boot lol....but I rather buy a house, beach house, viper, dirtbike, and a iPhone 4 haha had to add that last one for kicks. But man thats a beast tv]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[creezy8188]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@creezy8188 lol @ halo reach fail at taking advantage of even 720p, let alone 4k resolution...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlimSpaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[This Is designed for the rich]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolduder1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolduder1 <br><br>Or for corporate rentals...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolduder1 <br><br>This is designed to be a showcase technology piece for a trade show, and nothing more. They'll probably special order some for the uber-wealthy and for a few corporations, but that is about all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'd rather have one without the whole 3d thing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joppe karhunen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mrqs You don't have to watch everything in 3D. You can turn it on an off.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nebken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nebken  and*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nebken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nebken<br><br>wouldn't be as pricy tho'... granted i still couldn't afford one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joppe karhunen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mrqs  It would still cost the same. It's mostly in the software anyways. I'd buy a Maserati over this any day of the week. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadgetcomexcludeengadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just had an eye-gasm, put this in a box and send it to me [probably will have to pay a crate fee] and ill have a die-gasm. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[What can I say? This is the cliche TV for a man who doesn't know what to do with all that money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trickymaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pure awesomeness. I can only dream of every owning one of these. Time for another medium upgrade, blu-ray is dead. I think these discs should be enough to hold a 4K movie: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/18/inphase-announces-300gb-holographic-discs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2005/04/18/inphase-announces-300gb-holographic-discs/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poweroffice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm wondering about the power consumption?  300watts?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[truman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@truman I'm thinking 1kw plus!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlimSpaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SlimSpaceman  1.21 gigawatts]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heavy Loads]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[if they sell more than 100 they'll be lucky ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeviantmacG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DeviantmacG if they sell more than 100, they will 50.000.000+ cashflow :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlimSpaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Debbie does Dallas the Basketball remake. Is the only reason mark is buying this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Might as well buy a projector,i wonders how much power it consumes certainly in 4 digit numbers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimny410]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aim120 the thing is that the quality of a projection is way lower than one from a TV, still that thing will cost a bizilion dollars, if you can buy it you can pay your electricity bills ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alv  <br><br>The quality of a $100,000+ projector and the remaining $400,000 or so to build your own home theater will blow away this TV.  It isn't even close.<br><br>Think about it.  When was the last time you went out to a movie and thought to yourself, "wow, this would look so much better on a TV".  If you want to be immersed in the action, then you want a dark, dark room.  At that point the brightness of the TV is too much.  If you have ever used front projection, then you know that in a properly darkened room you turn down the light output of the projector anyway.<br><br>If all you want to do it watch sports on it in a brightly lit room, then I guess you can make a case for the TV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think its a bit to expensive.. Anyone know the reolution needed for it to max out the eye?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nimer_55]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nimer55 It all depends on how far away you are. You'll likely sit at least 20 feet away, would would pretty much guarantee it's better quality than your eye can see, though I don't feel like pulling out a calculator. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadgetcomexcludeengadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[WOW POINTLESS!<br><br>Plasma is a technology that is becoming less relevant these days too.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom902]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tom902 <br>Well there's an ignorant post. Plasma still owns LCD in every visual category (color, response time, contrast, motion resolution). And plasma has managed to stay ahead of LCD (even with LCD's improvements in contrast and blur).<br><br>Until OLED takes hold, plasma is still gonna be the best flat panel tech. Emissive beats transmissive any day.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan F.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tom902    WOW - what a strange comment.   A friend of mine just asked me about what the best TVs are.  I gave him the top 3 including a Panasonic with deep blacks.  He went to a couple of places that carried the different models and saw the Panasonic side by side with the one of the others at each place and chose the Panasonic despite the price.    His comment was that the action movies on the LED and LCD gave him motion sickness.   The LCD was brighter but he didn't care since he watches TV with the blinds closed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me likes. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 5:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want one as a secondary monitor. That's right my 24" will be the primary and this one I'll only use to have movies playing in the background LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AmyFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[OR you can just buy a 3D projector for $1000 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jediknight999]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jediknight999 <br>resolution comprehension fail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheRealMikeyG  <br><br>Where did he fail?  This is 4k resolution.  They also sell 4K projectors for a fraction of the price of this plasma...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SirMasterboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2010 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool, now I just have to build my house around it. <br><br>The house would probably cost less than the display... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Being a Plasma, It will be warmer than the suns surface in the house. Hey, you won't be needing central heating!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaftVader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 6:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DaftVader <br><br>Have you been saving that comment since 2004?  Because that's about the time frame that it would have been accurate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Coronation street on this whoop ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/panasonics-152-inch-4k-resolution-3d-plasma-ships-this-fall/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't 4096x2160 be 2K? Like 1920x1080 is 1K (or 1080p)?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Remarkableryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 9th 2010 9:49AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
