http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/ Engadget Comments for Go check out the new Joystiq! http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
I designed the site, Thanks :P]]>Jun 11th 2010 12:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
It's true guys, I stopped over earlier and decided joystiq no longer looks like shit =D Enjoy the brand-spankin-new awesomeness!]]>Jun 11th 2010 12:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/looks really good. I like it. ]]>Jun 11th 2010 12:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
BTW, Anyone who goes on joystiq, is gay.

Get it?

:P]]>Jun 11th 2010 12:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
The Jostiq design is so clean and optimized, it's so fast!

Engadget's website is nicely designed, but its bloated!

I love this new Joystiq style >:D]]>Jun 11th 2010 1:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
good job site looks great

but doesn't google.com remind you of the oil spill?

lol]]>Jun 11th 2010 2:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
i believe you

id want to show off too]]>Jun 11th 2010 2:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
It is huh, im guesing this is meant to change a lot of things

http://www.lucidica.com/]]>Jun 11th 2010 10:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/I think they are doing that to be asses. Dose'nt even work with ie8 in standards mode]]>Jun 11th 2010 12:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 12:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/62407]]>Jun 11th 2010 1:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/I understand the hate for IE, especially older versions. but to purposly cripple a website even for user of the latest versions of ie seems dirty to me. I'm posting this from IE9 preview and it still dosent work right

It looks to me as an act of stupid programing or lazyness, ie: if useragent is ie give em crap
ie7 render mode- renders correctly but hides the submit button
ie8 render mode renders wrong but shows the submit button and dosent submit
ie9 shows the same as ie8: and if ie8 is as standards compliant as people are making it out to be, someone somewhere is doing something wrong

I blame the people that aol hired out to make the site]]>Jun 11th 2010 1:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 1:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 2:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 2:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 2:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
If so, I'm totally in for that. ]]>Jun 11th 2010 2:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 2:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
+1]]>Jun 11th 2010 2:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 2:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 4:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 5:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 9:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 9:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 10:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
http://www.lucidica.com/]]>Jun 11th 2010 10:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 11:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/Jun 11th 2010 10:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/
One question, purely out of curiosity. Obviously there's a chunk of shared code here between Engadget and Joystik. Was it developed for Engadget originally, or did they in turn modify it from another site?]]>Jun 12th 2010 6:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/11/go-check-out-the-new-joystiq/===============================================
Card Service
]]>Jul 7th 2010 4:01AM