<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Switched On: An 'i' for imaging</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Switched On: An 'i' for imaging</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[i know i am getting it are you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade Me and my evo are sitting pretty]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Geek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[Count me in.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[potretr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Geek  Alright to be honest with you, I am getting iphone cuz evo sold out at my local sprint store :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br><br>Yup. 3GS sold on eBay already. :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade If the Evo was never invented & iPhone 4 was on a better network & didn't look dated, I would consider it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Son Of a Gun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br><br>This reminds me of one of those other editorial posts awhile back on Engadget arguing that the iPad was an adequate laptop replacement for business users. Just like then - my response is the same for this. Because you CAN do something on a device doesn't mean that you should.<br><br>It's great to be able to do basic editing on your phone but is that really a priority? I think video generally falls into one of two categories. You either are shooting something and uploading (uncut) OR you are putting together something with some polish. In which case you need some decent video editing software. Transitions, music, cutting, text, etc. <br><br>In the first case any video camera on a cell phone will do. You shoot the video and hit upload. In the 2nd case I want to do that work on my computer. I don't want to perform editing on a 3.5" screen. It's too cumbersome. Again, it's like using a device for email. I can bang out a lengthy email on my iPod Touch BUT I never would. If my response is more than a few paragraphs I wait until I have a full size keyboard.<br><br>Kudos to Apple to upping the hardware and offering the software for a nominal charge. I just bet that the software isn't used much. People will be much more inclined to use iMovie on their Macs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bjsguess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  <br><br>Who moved my cheese?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@who said what  <br><br>Btw, Ross, I liked the way you coined the term iCosystem. I don't know if you snapped it up from somewhere... but it works well. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess<br>I don't think iMovie is aimed at pro's, just enthusiasts and casual users (check the $4.99 tag). But I do agree with you... editing on that device doesn't seem smart.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gggg gunit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  Final Cut Pro and Premiere FTW]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess <br>For people like me who do not have a $2000 computer but want iMovie software, the new iPhone is freaking awesome. Most iPhone users have windows PCs, and I look forward to publishing HD videos with iMovie themes and effects on YouTube, directly from the phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br>Hell yeah bro. But seriously, yes I will be getting one of these. It's so pretty! Haha. Good phone, I'm happy for apple. Remember everyone, it's a phone. I don't know if I'm on this boat of have my phone be boss in EVERYTHING. 8 megapixels? Dual flash? More thing of course, but I just like it simple and easy. Well done apple. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[braiden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br><br>I don't understand this. How come Apple products rate apologetic and defensive sounding articles where other people try to use the square-pig-in-a-round-hole technique to justify why a iThing is so much better even though it doesnt have the necessary specs?<br><br>How come HTC, Google, Nokia, RIM don't rate such kind of devotional articles? The Big J really knows his flock, huh? He is truly a messiah since he can mesmerize the masses!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naashak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 9:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br><br>iphone has not hit the market yet and ross is already talking about the awesomeness of the camera. <br><br>evo has 8MP cam, 2 led flash and backlight sensor and u found iphone cam better which has 5MP cam, 1led flash and backlight sensor?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolkams03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess You make a lot of good points, but the thing is, not everyone has a Mac; therefore, not everyone will go and edit it on their computer if they don't have access to a cheap and easy video editor.  iMovie is 5 bucks for the iPhone, and it's arguably better than the latest iteration of Windows Movie Maker for Windows PCs.  Personally, I would never edit a video on anything other than a machine that has Premiere Pro or Final Cut, but I forget that not everyone has access to such software, and this kind of stuff will actually be very useful to teens.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolkams03 <br>What the he'll is the purpose of two led flash's anyways? Looks tacky and cheap and I can promise I wouldn't EVER be jealous of android camera specs. What a joke. The only thing I take out of android is the rainbow bubbles wallpaper the evo is advertised with. Otherwise, I am in love with the forbidden phone. (iPhone)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[braiden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dan325013  I think what you guys forget is the complexity of these programs to regular users.  iMovie on the iPhone looked soo easy my sister could do it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dxdragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade comparing crap quality vs crap quality, doesn't matter to me. Want to see good quality phone camera, get Nokia N8. They are photo quality is way better those from HTC, Apple, and Motorola but always lack the hype. No one knows]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1mc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PCG  If Google could manage making a video editing app for Android there's no way in hell Android fans would complain over how unnecessary or impractical it is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[franktinsley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolkams03  <br>1. you shouldn't even say your camera has a backside illuminated sensor, low light pictures is one of the biggest evo's complaints. <br>2 leds flash is not that special, the new thing is xenon which none of the phones have<br>3. 5MP vs 8MP is not the best argument - the pixels could be in different sizes and thus different qualities<br><br>the point of this argument is to show the excellent combination of software and hardware accomplished by apple.<br><br>example: apple has normal 1400 milliamp battery, excellent power management software -> great, longer lasting battery life<br>htc stuffs a 1500 milliamp (largest battery) and everyone complains of bad battery life (on 4G + 3G)<br><br>If anything, the EVO has proven that having "dream specs" does not equate to the best phone, or even a great one at that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dkeith95]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dan325013  <br>How do you know that?  It's unreleased software...and WMM is actually pretty damn good for quick, easy edits.<br>Of course, it's not fancy, but still: desktop video editing program > iphone video editing program.  Especially since, like I said, WMM is actually pretty good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[collindow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  <br><br>Even for simple stuff, I don't think a camera on a phone will cut it. It's a solution for the really lazy or something that works because of the convenience factor and because you always have your phone. However, for anyone that cares about the end result a phone (any phone) makes a crap camera.<br><br>This might change eventually. Today, you only use a camera if you don't really give a d*mn about your results.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jedi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 12th 2010 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dan325013  -- "Personally, I would never edit a video on anything other than a machine that has Premiere Pro or Final Cut, but I forget that not everyone has access to such software, and this kind of stuff will actually be very useful to teens."<br><br>You could also say you'd rather take pictures with a DSLR and never with a cellphone camera.  But sometimes the best camera is the one you have with you.<br><br>You can already trim a clip with the iPhone right now. Adding a little more editing possibilities can't hurt.<br><br>I shoot professionally with a Panasonic DVX100.  That said... sometime I shoot things with my cellphone for fun.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[Giving you another reason not to use your Windows Movie Maker!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[the.1.phone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  Im thinking about selling my trusty 3gs too... how much did u get? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iPhonemyphone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br><br>Yes.  Now you know that I am getting it too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PerfectC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolkams03  <br>I bought an Evo on launch day and one of the MOST unimpressive features is undoubtedly the camera. I won't even get started on the video recording capabilities (or lack thereof).. Don't get so caught up  on mega pixel ratings, they're simply one small slice of the pie that creates a good picture. <br><br>I don't mean to sound condescending in any way but it would serve you well to read up on digital imaging so you don't get caught up so easily in B.S. marketing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 1:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade <br>I've literally been using iPhones since the first day they were launched and upgraded every year but because of my business I also have a line with Sprint and I bought an Evo on launch day after hearing about it so much on the blog scene.<br><br>After my experience with the phone I felt really strongly about taking the time to review it so everyone else can hopefully see it before they buy one. <br><br>Here's the first half: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3XkTN4NHG8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3XkTN4NHG8</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 1:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[iDont like your iCosystem, Apple paid article]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beatnik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 1:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  Who said it was a priority? Apple is selling the App in the appstore for $5.99. If it was a priority, I think they would have included it in iOS 4, no? It's not in the software pack, so obviously they figured, some may want it, others may not.<br><br>But, also, many record a video and want to edit the video lightly. Trimming the video isn't always what people want to do on the go. I know some piers of mine that don't like to trim certain parts of a video, so, if they upload to youtube, they end up sending the entire video. What's wrong with introducing a system that makes it easy to lightly edit a video. Not every video needs to be professionally done, and the demo of iMovie was a perfect example. Maybe you should watch the video. It sums up the type of purpose iMovie serves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold Dead Fingers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 2:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dkeith95<br>i second that statement...thumbs up...point proven...period ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[millyman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 2:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dkeith95  <br><br>Xenon is not a new thing. My N95 has had xenon for over three years now]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jounihat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 3:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Android looks Hacked Together  iMovie isn't the standard. Final Cut is]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Koolpin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 3:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  I wonder what your reaction would be had Microsoft or Google been first to put video editing on a phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AceMcLoud]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 4:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@engadget<br>"The iPhone is expanding far beyond content consumption..."<br>commercial moments? ... live from engadget!<br><br>Why I feel - reading this - that Apple is the love of your life?<br>There are other phones... you know that.... no???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@naashak  I totally agree.  The iPhone is a great device, but the new one looks like the Microsoft Zune from last year and Engadget and other ripped it a new one.  Seems like they grade Apple products on a curve and give them credit for things that other phones already have.  For instance, in the first generation of the iPhone, they gave Apple a pass on the fact that the phone didn't have the simple feature of cut & paste, but when they finally added that feature, it was as if Apple invented the next great thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[toyotatundra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iPhonemyphone  <br><br>Considering it's 2 months old (but perfectly mint condition, scratchless + unused accessories) and I purchased it for £350 from my mate who didn't want it as an upgrade phone.. I got £420 on it on eBay minus about £20 in paypal fees and postage. Which I suppose is fair enough, since it's £440 brand new right now!! So £400 net add £100-150 should be able to snap up the iPhone 4 comfortably. /grin :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA["When the original iPhone was first launched, its camera ranked among its least competitive features."<br><br>Let's be honest, it still is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolkams03  <br>Megapixel do NOT make a camera take better pics, the quality of the sensor and lens is 90% of it. And megapixels just makes the photo larger. I have a Fuji F-10 camera with 3.2mp thats 5 years old and takes better photos than my wifes 12mp Nikon and my daughters 8mp canon, because like today, Fuji still goes or quality and low light capabilities and not megapixels. iPhone is the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikeserena]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade I'm most definitely getting one next month. Unlocked and no contract. :) Evo 4G need not apply.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mukatuna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@anothernerd  <br>Thank you so much for the review. It really gave me a deeper insight on what to get. Btw, you should get google voice so you can have 2 # on 1 phone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 9:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@naashak  <br><br>There is more to a phone than just a list of features.<br><br><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/09/iphone-4-missing-features/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/09/iphone-4-missing-features/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WARLYKE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iPhonemyphone  <br>i sold my 16GB 3GS for $375 on eBay.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 10:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bjsguess  I mean in reality do we even NEED any of these "smart phones" I mean I have gotten every iPhone sold so far (All 3) and plan to get the new one. But do I need them? Noooo. But I want them because they work dang good. <br><br>Same with this. I don't need to edit videos on my iPhone. But I am sure that as soon as people get the iPhone 4, iMovie will be the best selling App for it. Just like I don't type documents on my iPad for real but I bought iWork as soon as I could just in case I want to type a document in the future. <br><br>Apple knows this. And the iMovie app seems to work nice and easy so people will buy it and that is all that matters to Apple. That people buy their products. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@coolkams03  Mega-pixels do not indicate higher quality shots. Software is also very important in digital quality and usability. That said, I have yet to use the new iPhone's camera and app, so I can not defend Apple's case for quality and usability. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy Boy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@allenade They are doing so because they can see you "upgrades" every year. Don't try to put up a grand reason for Apple, Engadget! They could have just included the camera of iPhone 4 into the first iPhone but they didn't want to cuz they wouldn't have enough "ungraded" components in later version in that way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dkeith95  True, in an article comparing the Nexus One and the HTC Incredible's camera, didn't the HTC Incredible (also 8mp) get pwned by the Nexus One's 5mp camera? Whats even funnier about this is that there both made by HTC. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jounihat  <br>N95 never had xenon. It must be the n82 you are talkin about or you are just trolling. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramiarna]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: An 'i' for imaging]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/switched-on-an-i-for-imaging/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael Scrip kudos. i love my photography but i can't always be lugging my gear around. the best camera IS the one that is on you. photography is about moments. capturing moments. and i agree with the megapixels issue. hello? hasn't anyone realized how incredibly overrated megapixels are? it's only useful if it goes hand in hand with a good sensor. that's why at the height of the megapixel race companies that were pushing 12mpx cameras STILL couldn't get photos as good as some of the lower mpx cameras. one of the all-time classics, the fujifilm f31fd proves that. i'd rather have a great camera (even in my phone) with lower mpx but takes better photos than a showoff camera with lousy photo-taking quality. that said, the iphone camera has not been proven yet, but honestly i'm taking pretty good photos right now with the 3GS. low-light performance isn't great, though, which is why i'm hoping this backlit sensor will improve things.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keyrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
