<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whew, it had been four minutes since the last iPad article.  I was starting to get the shakes. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 Do you do anything besides posting on Engadget every day?  Never mind the fact that you have to post your opinion in every Apple thread.  You obviously feel very passionate about Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 You know what they say about Apples and doctors . . . ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek Why so serious?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Android looks Hacked Together  No, it's more of a magazine being made to look like a website. So you have the advantage of putting in more pictures/videos(/adverts).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@weedalin  Thats genius :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uckApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  <br><br>Not sure why you're getting downranked. It's a strange world when someone complaining about the number of Apple posts is getting upranked.<br><br>I mean, we've been complaining about this for years and nothing is gonna change, can't people just accept it, or move on and do something more productive?<br><br>Also, just remember that Engadget commenters are not representative of the larger readership]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[redcard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pukerocket  Who's complaining?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900 Who's complaining? Vdek or Duckman69 depending in which camp (hate that phrase) you happen to be in. Look, the entire point of the comment system is to make yourself heard about these articles. If Duckman69 want's to make light (or not) of how long it's been since an apple oriented post, that's his choice. Just as it was Vdek's choice to attempt to do ... Well I don't know what Vdek was trying to do. Either way people need to get over the fact that there will be a large number of posts about things that they do not like or "DO" like or whatever at one point in time or another. Just try to respect each others points of view and not be trolls about it. Don't like something that %99 percent of the people enjoy reading about, try a little self control and keep it to yourself, but you have the right to say what you want. Down ranking someone for stating their opinion and nothing more is stupid. Now if the guy does it in every single post and says inane things over and over in CAPS then by all means send him to the mines...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ttringle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 <br><br>Just scroll past that article... Unless you're paying for an engadget subcription or for the ap, I don't see why you're complaining.<br><br>Anyway, not only is the price silly, amazon was having a huge sale on mag subscriptions last week (might still be going on) and this magazine and a bunch of others somewhat related to it were on the list. I think it was between 10 and 15 bucks for a full year.... <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shamanx21]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ttringle  IMO, I think this was just a joke that some people are taking it a little too seriously. If I had said something like that, would you deem me to be whining or complaining or something of the sort? It's not like he said something like "Oh GREAT, MORE iPad news, you never get enough of it, do you Engadget?". THAT sounds more like complaining.<br><br>I agree that Vdek has a right to opinion and downranking someone over opinion isn't right, but that wasn't the case. Ducman was just making a joke, and here we are makin' a big deal out of it. Lol, let's just relax, and enjoy the internets, ya' know..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@N900  I find it hypocritical that he complains about these Apple posts yet he posts in every single Apple related thread.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vdek  <br><br>...says the guy complaining about complaining.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BigJayDogg3  <br>... says the guy complaining about the guy complaining about complaining.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[professor Farnsworth: "oh dear, they're stuck in an infinite loop."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ttringle  <br>I exercised my right to downrank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[A25i]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 <br>Entelligence: Wired () Tired(X)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zune Claus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lolwut  <br><br>ipad = fad. at least until they get some original ideas mixed into the ipad app store.  Otherwise you're just buying an oversized itouch that you can't fit in your pocket.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br><br>Except he's wrong. I'm not complaining.  Merely pointing out the hypocrisy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjaydogg3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 9:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tired,<br><br>of Gartenberg articles. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stylux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped <br>They got rid of the bagel dwarf intro though -- it's a start!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DoctarPeppar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DoctarPeppar  daamn they put it back on there :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gargle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DoctarPeppar  Haha, shouldn't have mentioned it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gargle  <br>LOL omg it's back....nooo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DoctarPeppar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@gargle  jinxed!  well, at least its not raising.  *starts to hear pitter patter* ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped <br><br>Ya, I was really hoping that this was a poll about entelligence, not another fucking article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DrDr Sure but at least this one, he's absolutely right.<br><br>Part of me thinks, eh people will realise this ipad thing (and paying for content that's free in websites which you can perfectly well read on any tablet pc) is just a fad, and it'll stop selling.<br><br>then the sane part of me realises that if any company has the marketing power to somehow bring back a *consumer demand* for 90s magazines-on-cdrom, it's sure as hell apple.<br><br>(and this is posted from... no, thankfully not an ipad... but a mac, still)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xxxsam  <br><br>Heres the thing, sometimes, like with the Kin, or like with the iPad as a "productivity device" he is totally and completely wrong. But even when he is right, the articles aren't exactly insightful. <br><br>$5 for an issue of a magazine plastered with ads is too much? No shit. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped Same... "Entelligence: Wired or tired?" - at first I was hoping it would be an article about "Entelligence", in which I would gladly vote for tired (of) ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 10:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xxxsam  \<br><br>You posting on Engadget( an ad filled website) is a fad. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pspitts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 12:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[As for me, the only thing I can't understand about these journal apps is why the heck should I pay, if I can get it all for free]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[Every magazine should be on the iPad!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dreed <br><br>Not every no. The Wired one is 500 MB, that's a pretty hefty chunk considering the iPad storage sizes. The features and video are nice but needs to be balanced... Imagine 500 MB for every magazine you read?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  I don't get wired, but if its like 99% of other magazines, 490 megs would be oversized advertisements that are difficult to flip past, and 10 megs would be useful content. =p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br><br>While rife with ads, it does contain a lot of interactive features and tons of video content. As a concept, pretty cool and enjoyable. Practicality/price.. another issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  Which is why the iPhone/iPad model is not particularly good for these types of applications. If I have to download 500meg for every magazine I want to read I soon fill up the limited memory I have access to.<br><br>It seems like one of two things could be done. Not to beat a dead horse but having a browser that can support more web sites would be a start. Flash is here and doesn't look to be going anywhere right away.<br><br>Second, in leiu of Flash support how about keeping the content in "the cloud"? Why do I need to download the magazine content to the iPad? Can the application be made to access the same content that is already on their web site? Even if it meant having Flash and non-Flash versions of some content that seems better to me than having to download large files for each magazine. <br><br>It would also be better for "archiving" purposes too. Having the content in the cloud would allow me to reread articles some other time down the road.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[waclark57]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[While I understand what goes into making these digital issues (I do this for a living) there is no way I'd pay $5/$10 PER ISSUE when I can read it online or pay 1/10th the yearly cost for the printed version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DizWhiz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DizWhiz Totally agree, if they made an app subscription price similar to the paper subscription then I would be all over it (and others). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DizWhiz<br><br>Hey, suckers are born/made every minute, and they need love too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[F. C.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[The issue I have is that you need the internet connection the whole time in use...unlike the kindle or other types of media which can download the entire magazine or articles first, and allow offline reading]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jr1986]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jr1986 <br><br>Not true. Have you even tried the Wired app? It's 500 MB and all-included. No internet connectivity required.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo<br>I'm guessing at least 450MB of that is Geek Dad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[They totally failed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonnyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good points.  I'd be interested to see the sales rate of the iPad after the initial spikes and if it really is a revolution or simply a passing fad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MarkAnderson That in conjunction with the rates when the 2nd (and 3rd) editions are released. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it is tired. It is a very, very slick app. What it tired is the pricing. I am not gonna buy until as a Wired subscriber I can have it included for free. I already paid once. twice is a big customer no-no.<br> <br>As far as the navigating the app, give me a break. Its a non issue. What are we in the stone ages? The same "confusing" ui issues could be brought up with mouse and keyboard. Despite the mouse and Kb being around forever there are still people who dont know how to use them properly. <br><br>Marvel Comics has the same problem. <br><br>These big media companies needs to get their pricing under control. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Dark Helmet <br><br>Another curious question, if I bought an issue of the magazine, read it and passed it onto you to read or photocopy (as a friend), that's perfectly fine for personal use, right. What about in the digital world? If I purchased the app and "shared" the .ipa with you, is it alright for you to install it (via crack/jailbreak) or not...? And why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Almo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lord Dark Helmet <br>Seriously?<br>There is NO indication if you can scroll down the pages, or only sideways.. it's trial & error testing!<br>The 'interactive' features are scrolling JPG's. it's a FLOP!<br><br>It's a PNG viewer at best, with a few ACC files and a Movie to play.<br><br>But then again, they had it all done in Flash with Adobe, and then came Apple saying they can't port Flash over.. Maybe they should just have done it right from the start - and not been using Flash...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob Peterh?el]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@marook  Well, this is why Apple doesn't want Flash on the iPad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zvx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 5:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/13/entelligence-wired-or-tired/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Almo  I believe so, as long as the person wants it, and as long as the distribution rights allow it to be done legally. If the app or file shared is not permitted to be distributed illegally such as through jailbreaking or if there's fine print that doesn't allow to be distributed to anyone else at all, then I don't think it's right to distribute it.<br><br>For instance I share legal MP3 files with my friends, and I believe that's right, but instances such as a copy of CS5 or a movie, that's a different story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 13th 2010 6:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
