<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I knew it!<br>Its too good to be true...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SolidSnake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake <br><br>still good on sony for trying it, for free as well]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chansthename]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Miller - you need a new shirt buddy.  The whole, check out my cool trendy shirt with my upturned collar - is old.  Doesn't work so well on grown ups.  Makes you look, not so intelligent.<br><br>Just a friendly heads up :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chansthename <br><br>Wont i need to upgrade to a 120hz screen though?  And I'm sure those fancy specs there cost a pretty penny too. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tobsmonster2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  The whole, criticizing someones fashion sense and expecting them to care what you think - is old. Doesn't work so well on grown ups. Makes you look, not so intelligent.<br><br>Just a friendly heads up :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOW THE HELL DO PEOPLE WHO WEAR GLASSES EXPERIENCE THIS TYPE OF 3D!???????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@chansthename  <br>Killzone 3 is free?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[punk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok. I hope this article aims to be a constructive criticism than just rant about a technology that's just getting started. Let's get down with developmental stages of new technology. When we had standard resolutions before we all said that HD is not necessary and it's just a hyped up expensive technology. But all that changed as it developed and maximized its potential for the viewing experience of the consumer (as HD content/media, storage and devices developed). I'm not saying that 3D will experience success too but if developed properly through time, it may. For now, we can't exactly say that the PS3's hardware is already reaching its limit for a technology that is still in its early developmental stage. There will be optimizations on the software end. So all we can do now is wait and see if the technology will ripen up fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tarugokomaraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  I'm actually just a dork who didn't notice he'd flipped up his collar when taking off his bag. No fashion pretensions here, I promise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake <br>This is why I'm kinda pissed that NO ONE is yet talking about the next gen systems. It's been about five years for the xbox360 and it's time to move ON. The Wii is barely capable of doing what it does graphically and even the 360 and PS3 are not capable of 1080p120hz for 3d. Once again, consoles have lagged too far behind PC's and it's time for upgrades.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lazarus Dark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Paul Miller  You're nice for apologizing to a jerk. Question: Do you see it as likely that Sony will couple GoogleTV with their 3D line of HDTVs? Seems like it'd make sense.<br><br>I for one want to play some Virtua Tennis. And I cant wait to see GT5 in 3D. I wonder if we'll start seeing patch announcements from 3rd parties. SFIV, UFC, and Fight Night could look pretty sweet in 3D. Could Heavy Rain's experience be enhanced by 3D?<br><br>My only 3D experience has been with Avatar, so I can only be optimistic, and hope 3D becomes a standard feature for Move games.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Omen_20]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  <br>Funny you say that since its not even a collared shirt.  It's a jacket with the top part unzipped.  By default, it looks like that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChansteR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake: I hate Sony 3D.<br><br>Seriously though, the resolution problem sounds about right...<br><br><a href="http://www.rgbfilter.com/?p=5366" rel="nofollow">http://www.rgbfilter.com/?p=5366</a><br><br>Bright games that play in 1080p native, like Super Stardust HD, look amazing, but if the resolution is reduced, like it is in Motorstorm, then it gets murky and tons of aliasing on the polygons.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Antboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake <br><br>I gotta experience it myself to judge.  But those shortcomings aren't dealbreakers for most people (millions are fine with Wii graphics so...).  And things may improve in the future anyway. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WickedEast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 11:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LazarusDark  Also the PS3 and 360 need hdmi 1.4 spec to do true 3D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake technically its not 3d.  its 2d characters with their bodies popping out, but it does not have the effect where bullets are flying or materials flying at you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  get contacts fool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[axertion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 1:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake I've been saying it for ages... the PS3 needs a serious hardware refresh in order to support smooth hi-def 3D gaming....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Omen20  <br><br>I think thats a great question--the better question though would be does Paul think Sony might plan on integrating googleTV into the PS3?  Granted it won't be Android, but it'd be pretty freaking cool to get chrome on the PS3 as the browser...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickjamess04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 2:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake <br><br>Pretty impressive considering how new the tech is in terms of console gaming, especially considering we're talking about retrofitted titles. Still, it's good practice to let this technology mature before acting. If this is the alpha level performance, I cant wait to see what comes down the pipe in say 2 years. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tofupancho]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 2:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LazarusDark  <br><br>THANK YOU! I was thinking the exact same thing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BoxBabaX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 3:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@soypancho  <br><br>I think we can expect for next-gen home entertainment:<br>60" TV with px1080p (double horizontal HD for 3D)<br>TV with altered polarized vision for polarized stereoscopic glasses<br>TV which is a computer / internet browser / socials (camera)<br>Consoles now fully integrate internet for multiplayer games/socials<br>Consoles that provide true 3D in HD<br>Consoles that provide 5.1 + surround sound in games<br>Games are played via movement (MS Natal), swings (Wiimote) and button mashing (DualShock3) or a mixture of them ... wait for it, the player decides on the form of input<br><br>So we haven't reached the top of the mountain, we've just passed the clouds and how long is anybody's guess!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kangal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 3:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Paul Miller  <br>as a person with experience and more knowledge in this area than me, the games are playable in 2d AND 3d, with an option to turn 3d off/on, right?<br>i mean, i love 3D and nvidia has made me see its amazingness when it comes to gaming , but my eyes couldnt stand the glasses for large periods of time (poor eyes :()<br>thanks for any replies :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HoldenMccrotch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 5:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@WickedEast  no, but the price tag of a 3D TV is a deal breaker. This is a tech that isn't ready for market yet. What developer is going to put any real effort into the 3D part of a 3D game, when only a fraction of the already smaller PS3 user base has a 3D capable TV? And of those, how many will end up not liking the 3D and just playing in 2D? Given all that, why would you put any effort into 3D game development at all?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Public.sjj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  Lasik ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[derrickONLINE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 11:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake <br><br>I'm just wondering if this 3D stuff is going to make those of us that keep playing 2D games look worse than if they left off the 3D stuff?  <br><br>ANyone else thought of this?  A game like killzone 2, which was around 25 Gigs or whatever, and they say that adding 3D only uses about 50% more of the disc if I read that right...  Then basically you're limiting the amount of the Bluray for 3d, and the majority of us aren't jumping on this bandwagon i don't think anyway..<br><br>I still haven't figured out if you have to have a Sony Bravia for the ps3 3D to work.  Bravia's are wayyyyyyyyyyy over priced compared to Samsungs and I love Samsung tv's.  Not to mention that the Bravia's you have to buy the freaking IR transmitter when Samsung's are included in the tv, and they're still like $500 cheaper.  Not to mention the freaking $150 glasses (not included).  And my Dad just bought a Samsung LED, he said the 3D version was only a few hundred dollars more but when watching 2D stuff it didn't seem as clear as the regular LED tv..  I haven't went and checked into this, anyone else noticed this?<br><br>And one more thing, if you look at the Sony Bravia's 3D tv's.  It says they have HDMI 1.3 ports.  what's up with that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elijahblake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[3D hurts my eyes, couldn't even sit through avatar with the glasses on.. I'll stick to 2d for the time being.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ruby i like you man i love your pic! THIZZ!!!! HELL YA!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ruby Didnt Sony patent some sort of virtual reality or something like that a few years ago? I'm guessing something like that would not cause alot of headaches and would be really cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ruby The shutter technique is different from what is used in theaters.  If you bebop to a best buy or similar store, they may have a shutter 3D TV setup for you to test run.  It may be easier on your eyes/brain.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Honis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[WILL SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME HOW PEOPLE WHO WEAR GLASSES CAN SEE 3D?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  <br><br>THE EXACT SAME WAY AS EVERYONE ELSE PEOPLE WITH GLASSES HAVE EYES TOO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Brad  BUT THEY CANT SEE PROPERLY WITHOUT THEM!! WHY THE HELL DO YOU THINK THEY WEAR GLASSES?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  They are abandoned! :'(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  The 3D glasses fit over your regular glasses in most cases.  They fit just fine over mine.  Still, though, the Sony glasses were heavier than I would like.  Someone will make some nice, lightweight ones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CityZen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  ACTUALLY, THE 3D GLASSES ARE BIG ENOUGH TO FIT ON OVER THE TOP OF YOUR REGULAR GLASSES, THAT'S A LARGE PART OF WHY THEY LOOK DORKY ow, all this is making my ears hurt somehow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Namarrgon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  <br>I just take off my glasses. Then, the jaggy resolution problem doesn't bother me at all. There, 2 birds with 1 stone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jukah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrT  - It's called You put the 3D glasses on in front of your glasses, fool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2010 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sony+3D=Amazing ! (Soon)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwi32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kiwi32 3D is cool...but you don't need Sony to make it cool. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carnival]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Carnival  i have nvidia 3d vision, and 3D is AMAZING, it's like looking into a window of the game, it's incredibly immersive... but to be honest, i don't always use it, i don't use it anywhere as much as i thought i would, the technology is there, it's just not practical ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Geek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@The Geek  It's not gentle to my eyes or the head.. With 2D I can play for hours, with 3D i get tired after a while. Sad :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carnival]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Carnival  <br>I am sure sony can improve it tough ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwi32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[sony = all hype<br><br>little substance...<br><br>3D is just another fad from the movie industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrookLynnsFinest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[And hopefully by the next generation of consoles, 3D TVs won't cost an arm and a leg, not to mention the shutter glasses required to view them.  Who wants to spend upwards of $2000 on a 3DTV and then have to pay something like $50 per set of glasses?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Moo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Moo <br>Me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwi32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is disappointing, but not at all surprising. Kind of expected, in fact. Hopefully the focus on preparing Killzone 3 for 3D doesn't take away from the 2D experience that the VAST majority will have (and prefer).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ifalldownstairs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I played motorstorm in 3D at a Sony style store and I thought it was cool, a but weird because it seemed more like I was racing an RC car instead of a full blown car.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've never enjoyed any 3D movie I went to until I take the glasses off.  3D just makes the screen darker and muddies up fine lines and details; it's like watching standard def television on a large screen.  The technology is simply not there and is a gimmic at this point in the gaming and especially in the movie industry.  The faster we can ditch this 3d gimmic fad the better movies and games we'll get.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loadoftoad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on PlayStation 3 in 3D impressions: almost, but not quite]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/16/playstation-3-in-3d-impressions-almost-but-not-quite/</guid><description><![CDATA[3D hurts my eyes. I swore Avatar would be the last thing I viewed in 3D until they get the kinks fixed with this technology]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[K Benjamin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 16th 2010 7:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
