<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool, <br><br>first thing I saw, I thought it's from Apple. But I was wrong. hu3]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hazelnuts89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hazelnuts89 <br><br>Ubuntu is really a polished operating system. I greatly prefer the experience over Win7, however I've yet to use OSX over a significant period of time. Mark Shuttleworth has promised that the next release (I think) will concentrate on small UX changes to really solidify the experience. Considering that 9.04 is already really solid, I wouldn't be surprised if 10.10 offers the *best* UX of all the popular desktop OSs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deadley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MagnetMan  I think it already does. And it continues to. The User Experience isn't Ubuntu's problem at all: it's support, both from hardware and software vendors.<br><br>I think it'll continue to grow and eventually reach a tipping point: it'll provide enough advantages to consumers to have them use it, then enough consumers will use it (as well as other non-Windows operating systems) to make developers consider porting their applications to cross-platform tools, then enough popular software will be available for it that those consumers that were previously reserved about using it will start to adopt it. From there, it climbs: as more people use it, more software becomes available; as more software becomes available, more people will use it.<br><br>I don't expect it to happen any time soon, but hey: Linux and the idea of open-source development are here to stay. It's certainly becoming more and more a popular approach to software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supermadman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a shame, it's so fast to boot up and easy on the RAM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paulus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad Ubuntu... looks like MeeGo will be the linux to use for tablets]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mhedhli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mhedhli But hold on a minute! Anything that runs on MeeGo will run on Ubuntu and vice-versa. They're essentially all the same tools underneath: Linux, GNU userland and Xorg graphical environment. Canonical has already stated that they expect users to use the side-bar-launcher, "Unity", with their fingers, and if finger-friendly software is developed for MeeGo then Ubuntu might become a tablet-friendly operating system without any real developer intervention.<br><br>Of course, they could tweak a few things to make it nicer...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supermadman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[When they get to the T's in their naming scheme it will be Tanzania Tablet Edition ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man, I would really love some ubuntu on any future tablet I get.... but just because they don't specifically make it doesn't mean it won't get ported over.  Offical support would be nice thought :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robert.stewart2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe run Obuntu under VMware under Windows Compact 7? On the other hand, just because something is possible, doesn't mean it's needed.  There are enough OSes already in the pipeline perhaps...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Merritt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@brianM <br><br>I don't think these tablet cpus can handle that. Plus if I was going to run ubuntu on one of these bad boys I would like to allocate the entire drive to an ext4 partition.<br>Ubuntu is fast. It is free. It eats little ram. <br><br>Its too bad. I bet if it was lisenced with ubuntu it would be cheaper.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tricheboars]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's why in KDE we're working on a shell for different form factors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@apol I really do love just how flexible Plasma is. It's produced what I think is the best netbook experience, and while we're at it, the best desktop experience too. :)<br><br>I suspect only a slight deviation from the current plasma-netbook would be necessary for a tablet, what with the widgets already being touch-ready and all. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supermadman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Linux UIs are not finger-interface compatible. Consequently there are no finger-friendly apps.<br><br>Canonical can, but it simply makes no sense for them to release an OS without useful applications.<br><br>And they are really small company to be able to supply applications themselves or organize enough 3rd parties.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dummy00001 Maemo would like a word with you about finger friendly linux UI's my good sir.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yomachaser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dummy00001 has a good point. <br><br>I have Ubuntu Netbook Remix running on my O2 Joggler, but while the launcher is finger friendly, the capacitive screen is not precise enough to allow me to accurately hit the 'x' button to close a window, and many of the applications require drop down menus which are nearly impossible to hit exactly with a finger. <br><br>Otherwise Ubuntu is pretty amazing, especially with Flash running in Chrome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZSX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ubuntu? What's that?<br><br>Windows 7 release + Android releases + iDevice hysteria have pretty much drowned them out of the public consciousness (if they were ever there)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LANjackal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LANjackal <br><br>I pity the fool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geek With Attitude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LANjackal Ubuntu is a very popular and user-friendly version of Linux that already comes in several different flavours to suite users needs and likes/dislikes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Rayo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DBG Ubuntu is awesome, windows looks quite garish compared to ubuntu's clean interface]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iucidium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@LANjackal I was being sarcastic with my question, guys. Of course I know what Ubuntu is and don't deny that it's a solid OS.<br><br>But it just can't match the excitement/hype* of other OSes out there right now.<br><br>*This has no bearing on the OS' technical merits]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LANjackal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't the Linux community be best served by a KDE-like effort instead of something spearheaded by a single company such as Canonical? Touch is complex and takes a lot of refinement.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mlayer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mlayer Refinement? That would be the speciality of Ubuntu and most definitely not of KDE?<br> though frankly a plasmoid style tablet could be very cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bungleofsketches]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mlayer<br><br>Canonical is cool. I'd rather see them than a start-up. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tricheboars]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tricheboars  KDE's hardly a start-up. It's much older than Canonical, if anything. It's been going for nearly 20 years now!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supermadman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bummer! I really wanted ubuntu. does meego run debian packages? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tricheboars]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tricheboars no, but it runs (almost) anything complied for fedora. (but you have to install with the terminal and  use "yum localinstall filename --nogpgcheck"<br><br>Hopefully the next version will work more like deb files in ubuntu.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aseaofflames]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[*sob*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iucidium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Makes no difference.  As others have said, even if you tweaked the OS to make the OS finger-friendly, none of the apps would be, and Canonical just can't make that happen.  Android and Meego are your only (Linux) bets here for the moment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2010 11:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fanfoot Consider: if MeeGo pushes people to make finger-friendly apps, they would be able to run on Ubuntu as well. Issue?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[supermadman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canonical hearts tablets, but it's not making a special Ubuntu for them]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/canonical-hearts-tablets-but-its-not-making-a-special-ubuntu-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well thats too bad.. I had some high hopes...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickscv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2010 12:28AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
