http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
http://imgur.com/V9N8c.png]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh0uSMbXDOc

I don't see how anyone could've done a presentation as marvelous as his while being as stoned as he was at the time.]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
I don't like the whole motion control/camera thing that these guys are pedaling. I think it takes a lot away from the game because you can't do as much with a motion controller as a standard one. And as awesome as 3D is, we don't have the panels for it yet.

Two issues I have are price and storage space. I can't believe games are $60, there are so many games I want but I'll be waiting to get them at $40 or less. I honestly can't justify spending that much for a game. As for storage space, I feel bad for developers trying to make games for XBOX and PS3. You can fit so much more data on a blu-ray so it seems like some serious issues are going to come up. ]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/This kid is an idiot...]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
How would Microsoft get an F?]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
I'm confused. Which kid? The guy who put together the (entirely accurate) chart or Tak Fujii of Konami?]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Well I'm guessing this chart was made from the perspective of a gamer. Given how much stuff Microsoft put out that pertained more to casual gaming and the in-home fitness market rather than hardcore gaming, I can personally understand why Microsoft got an F here.

It feels like Kinect is a gimmick (yes, I've used it. It's well-done, but I don't see much of any potential for it beyond controlling a UI and doing very body-centric activities).]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
A huge let down was Zelda... like wow... graphics look like ass. They better make sure that gameplay is on point because the tech demo on stage was horrible.

Twisted Metal was a surprise from Sony, never saw that coming either. I still need to see more to make any type of decision on the game but I'd really hope they would go back and look at part 1 and 2 and realize what made it fun.

Microsoft Kinect was okay I guess. I wish there was a way to get the voice command functions without dropping $150+.]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
And Sony? B+? Which blind person worked that out? They joined the motion controller era after last years E3 when Microsoft showed off Natal so it seems like they were playing catch up before the products were even announced. And 3D PS3 games seems like a bit of a non-existent sales point, it's like saying 'Yay, we have something that you don't have! But hardly anyone will actually use it for at least a year.']]>Jun 19th 2010 6:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/They did to this gen's Zelda what they did to Windwaker: they made it look more like art. I'm not a fan, but the graphics were pretty decent.

@MJYates
It's actually a B-.]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/sony had a great E3
E3 is a bout GAMES
sony had a shit ton of great games!
nintendo did too
Microsoft had shit for games
Zune, kinect are good but not what E3 is about]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 7:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 7:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Yes, that report card pretty much nails it.]]>Jun 19th 2010 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Agreed on the card

Engadget you are so wrong, yes Kinect is great tech, but their presentation and game lineup are completely underwhelming.

Nintendo 3DS on the otherhand provides glasses free 3D with a KILLER lineup no other console had done before.

Sony was quite fair they had neat announcements like Portal and Twisted metal.

And then you think bloody Dance Central is better than Kid Icarus?

]]>Jun 19th 2010 8:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Microsoft and Sony are looking a bit long in the tooth with this generation. I'd much rather they focussed on getting some great new IP out rather than slimming down the 360 two years too late and forcing all this motion sensing stuff on us.

Which brings me round to my main point, where's the PC loving, folks? It's not all about the big 3. Personally, I think Valve came out of this awfully well ;)]]>Jun 19th 2010 8:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Since 1997 theory stuff showed at E3 has been about gaming]]>Jun 19th 2010 9:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Fail auto correct fail]]>Jun 19th 2010 9:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
They finally make a Kid Icarus game but it's for the DS?? Where's the Wii version?

They release Starfox 64 for the DS... where's the Wii version??

Super Smash Brothers Brawl is 2 years old now... where's a new game?? Are we going to get a new Smash Brothers on the NEXT Nintendo console??

Given Nintendo has made lots of profit from their consoles, they should have tons of money for production of games. Stop being conservative and get this damn ball rolling. ]]>Jun 19th 2010 10:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/here's a comic to sum it up
http://art.penny-arcade.com/photos/903426984_Tg2it-L.jpg]]>Jun 19th 2010 11:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Konami : WTF

LOL!]]>Jun 20th 2010 3:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 20th 2010 6:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/I for 1 want a portable smash bros and I think that the 3DS is perfect for it. I always see 3D films and stuff as simply 2 separate layers, characters and background, with no real in between depth. While I hope the 3DS will prove to be better than that I think smash bros would be the good for it if it is just that kind of 3D as that's how the levels are with the characters at the front.]]>Jun 20th 2010 10:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 20th 2010 11:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/i dont get it, how is the PS3 move no better than the Wii? I mean, outta the box, isn't the Move equivalent to the Wii Motion plus? Check. Out of the box, isn't the PS3 HD? Check. Is there a WiiHD? No. So if PS3+Move is essentially a WiiHD, how on earth is this not better than the standard shitty looking Wii?]]>Jun 20th 2010 12:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Simple: Move is more money (PS3 + Move) for functionality which has already been well-developed for the Wii.
1) If you have a Wii and a PS3, there's no point in getting Move for any fitness games because you already have a Wii, and there's no incentive to get it for FPSes because you already know how bad the scheme is for most of them on the Wii (even with MotionPlus).
2) If you only have a PS3, maybe this is a suitable upgrade for you, so might as well.
3) If you only have a Wii, why go out and get the PS3 as well as Move? You already have the functionality you need for the reasons you want.
4) If you have neither but want something that's motion-based, why would you go out and get a brand-new, untested platform when you could get one that has already been developed?

There's only 1 out of 4 conditions here in which buying Move might be preferable. That's not the best business case for most people.]]>Jun 20th 2010 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/I love how people think they know everything even though they weren't there.

Just giving MS an F makes this chart worthless and fanboyish.

Ok I could see gamers (myself included) just not wanting to move and hating Kinect... but an F? Really?

I'm actually excited to see where Kinect goes and what devs do with it. People are acting like you can't use a controller with it. Who says? Devs can do what they want. Imagine a game using the standard controller, but there could be special applications where you use your hands to manipulate something like a HUD or a puzzle.

It's like a lot gamers don't have that imagination and wonder anymore.]]>Jun 20th 2010 7:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/gaming world. even though some titles are remakes how many gamers out there find themselves looking for emulators to replay that great game that was made 4yrs ago. the point is saying that Nintendo is remaking old games with upgraded graphics as if they don't got nothing up their sleeves is just a cop out. and then Turing down the 3d effect is great how many ppl go to the movies and watch flicks in 3D it gives you a headache or hurts your eyes. I think it's great that you can turn off the 3D when needed. remember Nintendo aims for everyone I'm sure my mom can't play a 3D game for 4hrs without and headache, I say Nintendo has gets a E+ :) putting then in 1st places hands down. as for Sony I think Playstation plus is great. if I'm not mistaking Xbox charges more than 50bucks a year. why not give players and PS3 owns a sweet snack. as for Playstation move I have had the chance to play with this thing a few times and it is extremely accurate and there's something to hold and the Wii feel with more accuracy with next gen graphics with the games you love think about it next gen COD with Playstation move or Microsoft kinect with nothing it your hands to feel or get that thrill of holding a replica gun or anything at that you decide. and if you have a friend that gets the move try it then tell me what you think. then GT5 and other titles where shown at E3 amazing. Sony has away with detailed graphics in their PS3 titles that seem to blow away other console titles year after year. then the whole 3D glasses unless Microsoft and Nintendo make their own TV with build in 3D technology like the 3DS then tilt your TV to active the 3D there all in the same boat so that remake was pointless sry. Sony in my eyes gets a A putting them in 2nd place and
Microsoft gets a D for bring the same titles and reshowing kinect again
a year later at E3 with nothing new to the field but a smaller console.
that's my thoughts I'm not starting any fights but its logic and in plain sight. hit me up]]>Jun 20th 2010 10:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
I am not the only person that had not purchased a PS3 because GT didn't launch with the console and I've had more than a few chances to buy one. I wanted GT5, that was going to be my first purchase, why buy a console for a game that's not released yet?

]]>Jun 22nd 2010 2:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/seriously, we don't need an apple mention in every article.
if apple had shown up and did something then whatever but just sticking it there with no actual context or content. that's just PLAIN BAD JOURNALISM.]]>Jun 19th 2010 7:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Seriously Engadget? I am disappoint.]]>Jun 19th 2010 9:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/This article mentioned all the big figures in gaming. Apple is a "presence" (though small in comparison) in gaming so its perfectly reasonable to consider what affect they might have on the market. Stop being so immature, bad journalism would be if they didn't look at all sides.]]>Jun 19th 2010 10:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Heavily disagree. Apple don't make games.]]>Jun 19th 2010 11:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/The intro should be "Entelligence is a column written by the Engadget staff, whose work is butchered and thrown together and eventually plagiarized under the name of a man who likes bagels, coffee, and huffing about Apple." ]]>Jun 19th 2010 8:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Microsoft had bland military shooters, and multiplats.

Also lolkinect.

Nintendo just wowed everyone with game after game.

Sony was just bleh, Twisted Metal is nice though.

Also Kevin Butler is amazing,]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/This guy is a journalist and not a gamer
Nintendo = 1st place due to StarFox and 3DS
Sony = 2nd place due to having things gamers actually are about kick ass GAMES!
Microsoft = Dead last due to a inability to play traditional games with kinect and no really good games outside of FPS's
]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/
Nintendo announces game after game, brings working games to demo rather than prerendered movies, busts out a new console and still has so many games to announce that they have to cut to their webcast because they've run out of time.

Sony tries to sell us $3000 TVs, Coca Cola, talks shit about the competition then drones on and on with meaningless marketing drivel.

Microsoft pulls down its pants and sprays diarrhoea all over the attendees.]]>Jun 19th 2010 6:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Agreed, microsoft is dead last.]]>Jun 19th 2010 7:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Sony and Microsoft's were both shit.

Sony was slightly better because Twisted Metal though.]]>Jun 19th 2010 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/19/entelligence-the-aftermath-of-e3/Jun 19th 2010 6:15PM