<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really glad Engadget did this post. Although they should have used the flagship phones... iPhone, Nexus, Galaxy S]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheHypnotist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist I;d say the flagships are in fact the EVO, the iPhone 4, the Nexus One, the Droid X and the Galaxy S and try all of them under the sun.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[serge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>totally agree. i have never really understood the difference. thanks to engadget, all is clear.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnderPaidOrphan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist To be fair the nexus one and the desire share both the display as well as the digitizer on top of it so it should be exactly the same. <br>Although the difference is very clear, I still wouldn' t like to do alot of work on either of those three phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dadu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>Why?  Everyone knows that geeks burn in direct sunlight. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br>Great comparison.I'd like to see the Iphone 4's display in this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huzzlehoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@serge  You kidding, the Iphone would be dwarfed by all those (You know Engadget doesn't like making the Iphone look bad)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fourzero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@UnderPaidOrphan  <br><br>My last phone was a Samsung i8910HD which was AMOLED and my current phone is an HTC HD2 which has a LCD TFT. Comparing them side by side indoors the AMOLED had extremely exaggerated colours which makes movies look fantastic and blacks so deep that the screen looked as if it was off in darkness. The LCD TFT on my HD2 has some backlight bleed (very little) and the colours are much duller BUT much more accurate - I think that comes out in the other video on the techblog site.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poulan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@huzzlehoff  <br><br>It won't be any better than the X10's display.  We're talking about the same LCD tech here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shooter McGavin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>Wow! It's going to be interesting when all these new devices come out! iPhone 4 with Retina Display, Super AMOLED, etc. Jeez! There's so much choice! It's a consumer paradise!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike10010100]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Android looks Hacked Together  <br><br>It's Google's flagship by definition. Seriously. It's Google's way of saying: "This should be the minimum of what everyone else is doing." It's the device that every other device should be compared to, as a base model. It's built to Google specifications, running Google's software. It's about as close to an iPhone-like existence as possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike10010100]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>Please Engadget, make a real comparison, where you give ranks to phones, ending with the one you like the most !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kineticdamage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Android looks Hacked Together  <br><br>I wouldn't say he's on his high horse. The N1 would come out unfavourably in these tests because it is shocking in direct sunlight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Android looks Hacked Together  <br><br>p.s. stop inventing reasons to call people fanboys]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andy b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>Does anyone notice that if you use your Apple handheld device on a slight angle even in the brightest light conditions, its like viewing off a sparkly paper? Everything is so clear.. I wonder why Engadget or anyone never points this out..<br><br>Even if the brightness is set to lowest, you can see and use the device perfectly.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uckApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Armchaircritic  <br><br>The HD 2 is also limited by WinMo's restriction to 65k or 16 bit colour.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>The HTC Desire and the Nexus One are basically the same phone. It would be nice to get the iPhone 4 into the mix. Seeing as how the new iPhone isn't widely available yet, I understand its omission.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[needmoregigs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist - I know what you are saying and this is the best comparison test I have seen so far.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZLiberator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist Why do you think the Nexus one is a flagship, talking about Android. In case you didn't know Desire is similar to NO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br>OMG, that Nexus phone ís really bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69  <br><br>and we all like to watch films in direct sunlight... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40  <br>Yeah, because clearly, bigger is better with phones.  How far we've come from the barbaric 90's when every generation of phone got smaller and smaller.  What were those idiots thinking, making phones to fit in our pockets instead of our man-purses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tonicboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist the is nothing particularly unique about the nexus screen so I don't see why you think that they should've used it. Yes the iPhone4 display is supposed to be better and would have been nice to have it in the mix but other than that the xperia is quite representative of what you should expect from LCD displays. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cg0def]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 5:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tonicboy  <br><br>LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uckApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 5:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Armchaircritic  if you saw OLED TV pic you would know that it takes time to get used to true colors after that LCD misshap... ;) with 76% of NTSC color gamut ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 7:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40 The IPS LCD on the iPhone and much higher res would kill the ones here. Then everyone would say it was the res of the screen and not the underlying technology.<br><br>In fact the smaller screen if the iPhone gives it a huge advantage here.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaffreywali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 7:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40 <br><br>Why would 2 giant phones make the iPhone look bad? Actual humans I speak with already find the iPhone too big.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@serge  Nice list, but I would def say that the Droid Inc. belongs in that list as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angermeans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 7:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>is this really burning issue tearing a divide in the community? all these years of cupping my hands over the sunlight, i don't think i've ever thought once how backwards the technology is..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aemengo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>What a silly post. Using auto-gain videocamera to shoot different brightness/contrast screens from varying angle of incedence.<br><br>All amateur shooters should learn one thing first before doing comparisons like this : <br><br>Human eye != video camera<br><br>Only comparing them directly side by side using human vision will tell the results.<br><br>The video camera will distort the results, that is guaranteed.<br><br>But hey, it's a real video footage, so it must be right, riiiiight?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vasra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 8:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Armchaircritic its oled, the screen was off lol. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Openwave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@uckApple  Um... no... you can't. I don't know of one device you can use perfectly in the sun with the brightness set to minimum. Not my ZuneHD, my Zune30, my iPod touch, my Incite, my brother's Blackberry, my gf's iPhone, or any of my friends' various phones. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 10:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vasra  I thought the video that was zoomed out provided the best perspective.  In that case, you could compare all 3 without the camera settings play a factor.  And since I (we) have extensive experience with LCD screens, we already have a baseline for that.  So basically, this shot told me that AMOLED screens suck in sunlight (knew that) and corrected my perspective that Super AMOLED screens were much better than LCD in sunlight.  From looking at this video, Super AMOLED = LCD  (LCD arguably slightly better, but Super AMOLED seemed to get better looking off axis while LCD got worse)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vasra How are we to show your type of results online? We can't! So our next best way to show results is with a camera.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hi-Def]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist <br><br>iphone does not have AMOLED .. why bother?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiangi Kushamisha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TheHypnotist I just love you picture. DOOM!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chazwell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cy Starkman  <br>The iPhone is too big?! Wow I think my Xperia is too small.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Francis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Chazwell  Doom is the fucking boss. You a fan, what songs do you like?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheHypnotist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 10:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want blood.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wemustcontrolpeople]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wemustcontrolpeople <br><br>all Phones Android, All phones total different Ui.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zylam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wemustcontrolpeople<br><br>ewww i can see right up his nose from down there ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wemustcontrolpeople <br><br>Anyway samsung's AMOLED is pentile type. Sad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arnoldphone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Iphone 4 vs Galaxy Comparison fast !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow big improvement :3  Sucks knowing this tech is just trickling in while about to jump on the Incredible,  but oh well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting how its done in direct sun to show the flaws.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nh7tr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nh7tr Interesting indeed, for a test to see how the displays perform in direct sunlight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[someToast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nh7tr <br>Yeah, I think they should of tested it in a fully blacked out room to test against direct sunlight.<br><br>However that would work work..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[QwaF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 6:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nh7tr <br> time for a math test, now take out your science book and turn to page 12.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't care about freaking direct sunlight tests! Just give me S-Amoled! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[landus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 3:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/super-amoled-vs-amoled-vs-lcd-in-direct-sunlight-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@suland <br><br>Home potato]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huzzlehoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 21st 2010 4:09AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
