<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, fuckin heroes!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google always wins! Unless they are going up against Apple. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes yes yes. Up yours viacom! +1 for the people :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Vick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sonicyoof <br><br>"...this court finds Google: Not evil"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Viacom can suck it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[treats!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@1 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA  <br><br>Apple hasn't attacked Google yet...only HTC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kanga]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great news! Viacom can go screw themselves.This DMCA shit is just getting out of hand.<br><br>Viacom uploads videos, and then someone else in Viacom sees these videos and sends a DMCA notice to YouTube to remove it. How screwed up is your company and how obsessed are you with the DMCA when your own company doesn't know its own actions? lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sax25]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@1 Infinite Loop Cupertino CA  No Google is already winning against Apple.  Let see:<br><br>1.  Choice of hardware.<br>2.  Open source OS that has been customized by the community to hell and gone.<br>3.  Can load just about any app you want on the device without Unkie Steve saying thou shalt not use [insert the app of the day that Steve o and his thugs thinks shouldn't be allowed.]<br>4.  Isn't Apple.  Which for many now a days counts for a lot.<br>5.  Still has the best maps out there.  (Go ahead and run to Bing Apple.  Go ahead.)<br>6.  And is WAY better then Apple's search engine....oops I mean Bing Engine.<br><br>Nope I'd call that a major win.  Long term Google and Android will hand Apple their *** and nothing you i Tards say will change that.  Well at least in reality.  In your own little fantasy world Apple will be god and you will get to kiss unkie Steve's butt every day.  Mmmmm taste like arrogant a hole.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kanga  Look up the term proxy fight sometime.  Apple is too much of a pussy to go after Google directly.  They are hoping to win through HTC.  Everything they are going after HTC for has to do with Android.  Not sense, and certainly not the hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe  It depends on whether Google can get their act together with the big fragmentation issues of Android.<br>The only way they can do this is make Android's UI so good, that Sense UI/MotoBlur/etc. will be rendered obsolete, so companies don't see a need to improve Android. <br>And then, voila! All the fragmentation issues are gone. <br><br>The N1 is really the prime example of the Android system going right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe Bing, it itself, is pretty damn good. I don't know what crap you have with it, but it's really, really good. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sonicyoof <br> And you know this maaaaaaan!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seven2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe  Not this topic again. Look, there just phones! In the end, both win. It's all up to the consumer, not some fan's opinion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZackC456]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sax25  This Viacom stunt is exactly why that clause exists in the DCMA. With hundreds of videos uploaded every day, Google can't vetted every single one of them. But if you gripe, they do take them down. <br>Funny thing is that it seems like these companies are hella quick to gripe over a fan made music video or a video review of a movie and totally miss whole movies and tv shows being posted. maybe that's why they want to put the burden on google, so they don't have to pay folks to find the naughty videos for them. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sonicyoof What is YouTube?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bully]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sonicyoof <br><br>"like say, the music videos Viacom employees covertly uploaded themselves and then demanded be removed."<br><br>wow amazing you remember this but dont remember the conversations of the youtube founders stating they  KNEW that they copywritten content and kept it for the views]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kid300  Just admit androids ugly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[win]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Twoleaf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Twoleaf <br><br>Sadly Youtube will never be what it was back in early 2007.... =/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Platinum_Skeet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Youtube get a penalty for illegal celebration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexpeegs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Alexpeegs gets* Oh well time to get on my Spartan Armour  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexpeegs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[TAKE THAT VIACOM!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jsocontrer01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[The court finds that Viacom may suck it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Psyclotr0n]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[counter-sue!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GaryZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GaryZ Everyone wins*<br><br><br><br><br>*Everyone does not include people that aren't copyright lawyers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@d0mth0ma5  No that depends on your definition of a copyright lawyer.  Are they really a person or a maggot infested POS?  If they are the latter then yes....everyone wins.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm genuinely surprised that Viacom would even consider taking Google to court over something that is essentially out of [Google] their control.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[One of the bigger cases and of extreme importance for the future of both copyright and content on the internet, yet no breaking news tag. Should have been called iTube for that i guess...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait...what?  If that is the case then how is it that Bit torrent sites like Pirate Bay can get slapped down?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe For that matter lets go back to Napster.  Google won because they are google and they have a metric crap ton of money to defend themselves with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe..]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe  you are comparing apples with nuclear submarines]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe Because the pirate bay wouldn't remove content requested to be removed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shakeandblake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John Doe Because bittorrent sites aren't doing anything that remotely resembles 'fair use'. they are knowingly distributing copyrighted materials without permission from the owners. <br><br>most of the 'offending' material on youtube is fan videos of tv shows and movies, fan covers of songs and reviews. all of which could be considered fair use under copyright. But even so, if a company cries foul, google removes it. Even if fair use could apply. Then makes the uploader make the claim etc. However if the owner cries BS Google sides with them and keeps the video off. <br>I should know, they yanked the videos of my movie reviews because I dared to include clips of the movies (all done after they went to DVD so I didn't pirate anything). No shock Viacom was the biggest to say BS to my fair use claims]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now if only FIFA would stop screwing the US team]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Baconbits You're doing ok, you're on the easiest path to the Semi-Finals]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Baconbits <br><br>cmon..things have turned out well....they ended up on top and have one of the  easiest second round matchups. Much of this has to do with England being entirely lacklustre, but that's a different story :)<br><br>OT: GFY Viacom  \o/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[astrotoyseven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Baconbits Huh? Get a clue. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ugkul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cowthulhu  <br><br>2 disallowed goals in two games because of two phantom calls. Who needs to get a clue now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Padilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[so by the same rule, services like Rapidshare should also be granted safe harbour.<br><br>RIAA's not going to be too happy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattyG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Gonzie <br>Actually a recent ruling on RapidShare said they were not breaking the law since they do remove thing if someone request.  They fell under the same safe harbor law as Google in that ruling]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet  <br>hmm how did I manage to miss that?<br><br>good result though, not that it's going to stop them being at the top of some list]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MattyG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[PwnTube!<br>Good news.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Viacom, <br><br>Google "U mad?"<br><br>Signed,<br>A YouTube Viewer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rainier <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFgXF0a_Yw4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFgXF0a_Yw4</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DelayTime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rainier <br>+1 for Google!<br>Suck on this Viacom! But thanks for Spongebob! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheesus Crust (Steam=AliShaikh94)(XBL=AliShaikh)(PSN=Cheesus00Crust)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[VAICOM: Very Annoying Irrational Copyright Obsessive Motherfuckers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bo3of]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bo3of so close, yet so far away...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bo3of Nice job, but it's Viacom, not Vaicom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HikaKao]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HikaKao  <br><br>we know its viacom but the dude wrote something funny lol. so i upranked him +1 :) lol. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Vick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[*goes to watch the Daily Show uploaded on youtube*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/23/google-wins-youtube-copyright-case-against-viacom/</guid><description><![CDATA[Suck. It. Viacom.<br><br>Cheers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[karaokequeen3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2010 5:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
