<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Epic battle]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ComeShot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br>I've used both and I have to say, it's pretty damn close. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler Verrall]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android Always WIN.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[potretr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@VSpike915  If it's pretty damn close, I would go with the Samsung for two reasons:<br>1) Its widescreen, so the black bars will be either non-existent or much less obtrusive.<br>2) Its bigger.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daftrok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot<br><br>They both looked the same to be honest... of course though, both could not stand to block out the awesome solar-glare of the sun when tilted left or right.<br><br>I say....  DRAW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let all of us be the judge and release the Galaxy S / Pro already Sammy!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[katiedonut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot This is a KO by the iPhone 4!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaffreywali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>So it boils down to:<br><br>- Under a microscope = iPhone wins<br>- Normal distance = Both equal ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DizWhiz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@katiedonut  <br><br>I dont understand the point of super screen close-ups. If you need to zoom in that much to see a difference, holding the phone 20cm away from your eye would mean that awesome 300+ DPI pretty useless in comparison with a 200+ DPI display]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mnhthebest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>Exactly...both are incredible and most end users will/should be ecstatic with both. It's progress, no matter what way you slice it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagdae]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daftrok  wow when did we reach the point where we choose a phone because it's bigger?<br><br>everyone is going to hate on the iphone for not being better but I see it as at least it's as good as the best competition, who can complain with that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot : The question is, do you want a bigger unit or better looking unit?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot Now make it a bit more interesting. The smaller screen on the iPhone make it brighter by nature as the pixels are more dense. How about comparing it to the Samsung Wave?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HPe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>The picture 8 (of 45) explains perfectly why I will make the Galaxy S a winner : There's more page content, and it's bigger.<br><br>Sorry Apple, I loved your 3GS, but I can't suffer from eye bleeding anymore when browsing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kineticdamage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@potretr  Not in the real world unfortunately :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninetysix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>I think we can all agree they both suck in direct sunlight...<br><br>We're just not there yet! Maybe in 2020 if we make past that 2012 hump, amirite?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiizer [Now with 320 Gigs On My Launch PS3!]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jaffreywali: its close. iphone has the higher resolution, the galaxy display would save 40% of electricity compared to the iphone display.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dartox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@VSpike915  <br>I used both as well. but i think samoled slightly edges it with the rich colours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr Lisbon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dartox: oh, and there is real black on the galaxy display, iphone shows something like "blue-black" ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dartox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br>somehow useless. It's clear that under a microscope the iPhone 4 display wins, because of the higher pixel density and the fact that it is an IPS display.<br>However,<br>OLED has true blacks / LCD not<br>OLED is power efficient / LCD not, always full backlight<br>OLED has very vibrant colors / LCD not, more natural, however, no one does print production on a smartphone, so OLED just looks color richer<br>LCD has its advantages, too, however, especially on a smartphone, OLED is in my opinion the winner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPhone just got iPwnd by the Android phone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot Engadget picking an apple product to win a "Fight!" again? The world is shocked.<br><br>You may as well stop doing these Fight! articles since you always pick the Crapple stuff anyway. BTW how big is the bonus check you're getting for all this iPhone 4 coverage?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love  The answer is. You want a better unit. A unit that will not shatter if you drop it from 3 feet. A unit where white is white on you screen, not yellow. A unit that will allow you to make phone calls and browse the internet if you hold it in your hand. And you want the best looking screen on it of course. Hence, you go for the Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HPe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love  That's what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HotBBQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kineticdamage  I agree.  I think 4'' is the sweet spot.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowspeed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>Come one people. I own an Android phone with an AMOLED screen and the iPhone wins this one. It's ultra sharp. Not even a contest.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot Not really. It proves what I've figured would be the case from the get go. At normal viewing distance theres no difference. You have to put your eye on the screen to see any benefit to the iPhone 4. I'm also wondering about the brightness as well. Was the Samsung turned all the way up? And why no test on contrast? Lets see which one has the best black. Why do the comparisons focus on what you see with your eye on the screen?<br><br>I'm waiting for my coworker to bring his iPhone 4 to work so I can check out this screen vs my Incredible. From the looks of it all he is going to have is a little better time in the sunlight. People keep talking about this oversaturated crap but I think most people like it. Thats just vibrant color. People have been to used to looking at washed out screens. If something is blue I want it to be BLUE and so on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaque14K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  <br>AMOLED != SAMOLED]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strawe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DizWhiz  Also consider that this technology (though useless as mnhthebest says) will eventually put on larger screen formats. Pushing 1080p on 60" + TV starts to get pixelated yea? I may be wrong, but imo smaller pixels will always be a good thing, and not useless. I'm not sure it that'll require 4k or 5k content or something beyond...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daftrok  <br>Don't forget that the AMOLED uses less power than the IPS display.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Complex Pants]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br>You would think somewhere in the review they would have mentioned power draw. The whole point of the super amoled is to produce a better or equal picture while using up only a fraction of the power. Samsung wins hands down once you factor that in. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dswatson83]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DizWhiz  you'd think so until you compare the new display first hand. Pictures really don't do it justice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tkuhl87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is there no mention that superamoled uses 30% less power as the iphones screen?<br><br>(android ftw? :P)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[besuikerd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mark29  Uh, given that these phones are used for MULTIMEDIA purposes, a bigger screen is kind of important. Also given that the ratio is 1.5 on the iPhone, black bars eat away at my precious movie/episode/clip that I'm watching. So it makes complete sense to choose a bigger 480p 16:9 screen over a smaller 640p 3:2 screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daftrok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@HPe No update or one update vs. Future proof for at least 2-3yrs hint, apple. You lose.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hi-Def]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Xtole Really? From the pictures here there isn't one case where the Galaxy screen outperforms the iPhone in display quality. Not one!<br><br>Time to call a spade a spade buddy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaffreywali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jaffreywali  There's more to a phone then how the screen looks. Man are you shallow]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@VSpike915  <br>Lot of people forget that AMOLED is much better in power consumption than Apple's IPS LCD or any other LCD,which is a more important advantage than pixel density, in my opinion. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hary536]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@daftrok  I completely agree about the screen size comment.  I use my N1 to watch films/video at the gym.  I certainly wouldn't want a smaller screen.  If anything, a slightly larger one would be beneficial.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rincewind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot <br><br>Heck, even a blind man can tell the iPhone display is better.  Just kidding.  They're both very good.  Consumers are fortunate to have such choices.  Smartphones have come a long way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MosesusedaniPad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kineticdamage  You can't be serious. The screens are at different levels of zoom. The Galaxy is clearly zoomed in slightly, and oh darn you can't see the ads on the iPhone. You do know the iPhone can zoom in right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[enigmaaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@VSpike915  Fight?! hahah. That's a slaughter, iPhone 4 all the way. Wasn't even fair.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dartox  'Cept for the iPhone has a better battery and lasts longer so your argument is mute]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Metalhaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[I prefer better/true color saturation, deep black and high contrast ratio over brightness (plasma over LCD) and if that comes with better power management, it's a win. Plasma is great but use a lot of power compare to LCD. On the other hand S-AMOLED uses less power than IPS/LCD and looks great. On mobile device S-Amoled is a win, I guess a 300+ PPI S-AMOLED will be the killer display, microscope or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[20XFaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Complex Pants  Yea uses less power and the iphone still gets better battery life. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jsbaugh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tes  <br><br>I believe there's an "S" in front of these AMOLED, completely new tech on phones.<br><br>I have the Moment, and the wife has the EVO.  I feel like my phone is old hat now!  And her EVO screen is much better in the sun than my Moment, not even close.  I believe the EVO is LCD, and the Moment is standard AMOLED.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnnySocko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Crank  <br><br>Of course, but how is Apple going to justify a new phone in 12 months?  You can't just give yours fans everything at once.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[themagicfetus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Crank  how bout you beat both the IPS and the OLED for dropping the hard cold facts on both displays. +1+1!!!! Thanks to your input i learned something!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jiggie82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mark29  <br>Because it's screen is bigger to be precise. For example, it has been stated of the Evo 4G that due to it's 4.3" screen size, the on screen keyboard is even better than the iPhone's. This is the conclusion of several Engadget editors. <br><br>Also for gaming, media playback, browsing, bigger is just generally better.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComeShot Why do the first 4 look like they were shot with a macro lens or another zoom that is closer and more detailed than the human eye would be typically interpreting.... ? :-/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
