http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
http://www.tmonews.com/2010/06/t-mobileclue-com-is-live/]]>Jun 24th 2010 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/wait a min...the link I just gave is the same as the one you source...did you even look at it? Why play coy and say "[unknown]"?]]>Jun 24th 2010 12:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Androidandme just gave the whole thing yesterday...
That's a bee under there.]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/With all these galaxy's coming out (every carrier except verizon) they all seem exactly the same(exept bloatware) in features. It seems kinda funny that this phone is getting more market penetration than th N1.

Also if i could choose one it would obviously be the sprint 4g(galaxy s pro?) version because on stprints plan with the 4g charge its still 10-30 bucks less than its competitors.]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
Besides the fact that N1 will receive great support, this device beats it. Better processor, better screen, better battery, better placement with carriers (they don't like being cut out so that's why some delayed acceptance before ultimately cancelling their plans). All that results in greater market penetration. ]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
Its done in Silverlight.. ]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 4:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 8:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Yep, I'm going to refer to all these phones as Galaxy Ss.]]>Jun 24th 2010 12:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/It's still the Galaxy S. The codenames "Vibrant" and "Captivate" are just to differentiate the phones because they look different.]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
Unless this is a marketing exercise to see which name the public likes more, I think it will hurt the phone to have multiple brands. The custom-branding may be at the whims of the carriers, though.

It's nice, however, that this phone is being released on many different carriers. I have a feeling that this will be a VERY popular device worldwide and will be the new android flagship.]]>Jun 24th 2010 3:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
Ya but it really helps when light is nonexistant]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 2:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 11:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! Good one!!!!!!:D]]>Jun 26th 2010 3:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/look at Androidtrashstore, full of crap, its pathetic. How do you want to take advantage of the outstanding Galaxy HW, when it´s only loaded with "pong" or "tetris"?
Bada has way more potential, as it´s like Apples closed system, which commercial labels like Gameloft,Capcom,EA prefer, actually they have already contracted.
Asphalt 5, Route66 are just early examples, Sygic will join soon. ]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
But, I guess if I wanted a closed-marketplace I'd still be in the iPhone camp. Still, even if you don't like the marketplace in it's current form, it's hard to imagine that if Android has 3-5x the market share of Bada, in let's say 2015, that developers will prefer to develop only for Bada when there will be WP7 & Apple, plus a marketplace that is much larger than Bada. ]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/I see in Android a place for amateur software engineers, which do their first steps with it and collect xperiences. it´s just a palyground.
Look at desktop Linux OSes like Ubuntu, NO quality Software, just semi beta crap, this is the same way Android will go.
Get in your mind that Samsung is Worlds second greatest phone manufacturer, not with smartphone OS.
Bada does not only visually imitate iphone OS, it´s written with C++ just like iOS, so it won´t be too hard to port Apps.
Hmm yea WP7 is also very promising, due to XNA and so, that´s why i also see WP7 ahead of Android.
Maybe Android will quantitatively the winner as it will run on every cheap low budget phone, but count is not everthing, look at Nokia
]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/to each his own but you by yourself on that one!

Look at the 5 best phones out now and tell me that again
HTC and MOTO aren't going to bada to sell phones are they?]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
Pretty amazing effort you've made.]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 1:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/
I think you're confusing the reasons for the differing levels of support between Windows & Linux, and it has as much to do with hardware constraints (well, drivers) and the lack of adoption (not claiming to be an expert, but you seem biased so not really sure how you will convince me without a source article or fool-proof logic). Android doesn't have these same issues. ]]>Jun 24th 2010 2:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/ok, you are a troll
*ignore mode on*]]>Jun 24th 2010 2:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/ah sorry i didnt ment u
]]>Jun 24th 2010 2:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Ok you are obviously a troll
*ignore mode on*]]>Jun 24th 2010 2:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/lol engadget comment system is a joke]]>Jun 24th 2010 2:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Jun 24th 2010 12:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/But, then you need something to represent "nt."]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Bra + **nt ...nice..]]>Jun 24th 2010 11:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/Samsung is out for me regardless due to their promising to update and then failing to follow through on said updates with both a winmo and android phone that I know of...maybe more.
]]>Jun 24th 2010 12:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/t-mobile-usas-samsung-galaxy-s-to-be-called-vibrant/haha and u think HTC will be better?
my warning is for zero but if you prefer to pay for your lesson, then go buy an htc]]>Jun 24th 2010 1:07PM