<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slygathor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA["Ma Bell's" <br><br>Is there an innuendo in there somewhere or is it just a typo?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  <br><br>Ma Bell refers to The Bell Telephone company of the latter part of the 19th and 20th centuries. AT&T was a part of that giant company.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[harhar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@harhar  <br><br>I get that.  It's a typo.  It should read Ma Bell.  Not Ma Bell's.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc - No, I think it should be "Ma Bell's" since Engadget is referring to AT&T as Ma Bell. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MRCUR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc<br><br>No, it's correct. Just look at this:<br><br>"...as Ma Bell's just finished its 850MHz 3G upgrade..."<br><br>Ma Bell's = Ma Bell has<br><br>Most people would think it's saying "Ma Bell is".... but most people don't know that putting apostrophe "s" on the end of something also can mean "has".<br><br>It's a lost art really.... Engadget has some quirky writers :)<br>I love it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Slygathor <br>only time will tell]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolkams03]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  What the hell are you talking about?  "...Ma Bell's just finished.." = "...Ma Bell has just finished..."<br><br>English must not be your first language.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlappySquirrel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Slygathor <br>But where's the beef?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SlappySquirrel  <br>I was reading the comments and because English is not my first language I did a Google search on the use of the apostrophe and the first site that I found agreed with @AbSoluTc that it can be used with the verb has. Not sure if this is right or if applies to all the English speaking countries. Check it out.<br><a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Apostrophes</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mannyengadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theCatcher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc <br>And some don't understand grammar & usage well enough to know ( 's ) is also a modifier to indicate a possessive. ( ex: "it is Microsoft's property ..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theCatcher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame  <br><br>"but most people don't know that putting apostrophe "s" on the end of something also can mean "has"<br><br>You are kidding with this, right? The 'most people don't know' part I mean. What's going on in your English classes over there?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeKo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ma Bell's is seen as a plural or possessive.  Since when has it been anything else?<br><br>"Microsoft's new Xbox".  Microsoft has new Xbox?  Really?  News to me.  All I am saying is it looks and sounds incorrect. If the writer MEANS Ma Bell has, they need to state as such. <br><br>So what people are telling me is, I can forgo the word "has" if I ad an apostrophe s to my words now? <br><br>"John Doe's a car."  means John Doe has a car? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[absolutc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plazmic Flame  <br><br>Ok, forget I asked. I see what you mean. Oh boy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeKo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc<br><br>I'm not the best at teaching something like this but maybe try taking this test, it should give you your answer...<br><br><a href="http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/exercises/confusing_words/s_is_has.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/exercises/confusing_words/s_is_has.htm</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@harhar  AT&T wasn't just part of the Bell Telephone System. It was THE Bell Telephone System. So AT&T = Ma Bell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tenkiyohou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  No, since you're using "has" in that context as a verb, you wouldn't shorten it with an apostrophe.  Saying "AbSoluTc has a clue" can't be made into "AbSoluTc's a clue"...that would imply possession and is an incomplete sentence.  Now, "AbSoluTc has got a clue" COULD be changed to "AbSoluTc's got a clue", and it makes sense.<br><br>Now whether that's the truth or not I can't say. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  <br>you don't use apostrophes to denote pluralism. as for your "has" argument:<br><br>AbSoluTc has been wrong the whole time.<br><br>AbsoluTc's been wrong the whole time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[snugs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Slygathor <br><br>what about long island at&t? I'd be better with a cb radio then you clowns]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[This has been, BY FAR, the most entertaining thread I've read on these forums. I came here, out of shear boredom, to read the typical AT&T bashing, and instead I got pure comedy.<br><br>@AbSoluTc<br><br>Let's save the grammar lessons for those who know better. Oh, and that wasn't a possessive "Let's," it was abbreviation. You can do that too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@harhar  y don'tcha yall axe Ma Bell¿]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Common Man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Slygathor What would be nicer is fixing San Fran so the tech writers can stop their bitching.  I insist on ATT because they are the only reliable network near me and they have the best coverage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fastm3driver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 6:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AbSoluTc  <br>just shut up]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamburgler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 6:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or try this one:<br><br>He's been getting really mad lately = He has been getting really mad lately. <br><br>Make sense now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sivadgiarg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2010 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[should be the key word with AT&T...they "should" be able to do a lot of things...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[southern78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was holding off on the iphone bc of the shity service att has in NYC.<br>I might change my mind now]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about DATA?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techlord <br><br>Way improved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techlord <br><br>850 Mhz uses voice and data ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EPA2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[My service seems to have been improved.  My iPhone has none of the problems reported by others.  Rock solid and super clear calls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JCC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NoobsRUs <br><br>My calls are no clearer (I would LOVE to see "HD voice" calling as Orange is starting in Europe), but the connections drop less often, and I generally have better signal strength (yes, even when "holding it wrong")]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ  I'm moving up from an iPhone 3G.  I notice the improvement in sound quality right away.  Don't know how much is due to the new iPhone  4 and how much is due to network.  Probably a bit of both.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JCC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ  I'm with you. I've seen no discernible improvement in either voice quality, but I won't write off the "improvements" just yet...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NoobsRUs  Why not just see if the 3GS works better? Then you know if it is just the network or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brutek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's gotten way faster, too.  I get ridonkulous download and upload speed on my iPhone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ I got 4.6 Mbps down and 2.6 Mbps up. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CTTHosting  <br><br>Wow! Who needs 4G!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ  Those who want better latency!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vipervin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ <br>Although not in NY, I am getting consistent 2.5-3Mbps down and 1.5Mbps up in Las Vegas areas.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CHRiS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CTTHosting  I get .7MBPS down and .2 up.... im in Maine, why not do and upgrade here? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thefrataline]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2010 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets see, I had NO voice quality, so now I have 47% quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[genomecop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@genomecop <br><br>0 * 1,47 = 0 :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fliesen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@genomecop <br>Such Math whizzes... I was thinking that since 30% drop calls, a 47% improvement would make it -17% of iPhones dropping calls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onlymyrailgun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@onlymyrailgun  <br>or maybe.. 47% of 30% is 14.1%. <br>Since that's the improvement, we're talking 30%-14.1% <br>= 15.9% dropped calls..?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bricktop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh. I can't tell the difference on my Motorola RAZR. -_-]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryuuzaki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ryuuzaki <br><br>Whats a Motorola RA.... OH wait I've seen one of those before in the museum!! I heard thats what people used before touchscreen phones came out with the ability to do more than call people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CJisohsocool  imagine that someone who uses a phone for........ a phone :O ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CJisohsocool  Didn't Laura Ingles have one of those?  The RAZR was the wooden one with the crank handle, right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SlappySquirrel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T says New York 850MHz 3G upgrade is complete, voice quality improved 47 percent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/atandt-says-new-york-850mhz-3g-upgrade-is-complete-voice-quality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally, the whiny new yorkers can stop crying!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
