<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[epic eh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin Getting it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fowenati]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[So android lovers now have the Evo, the Vibrant, the Epic...<br>With so many cool android devices being realised lately it basically comes down to carrier choice, doesn't it ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jayjaync]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin sprint's on roll man! Looks like they're attracting many more customers with services and phones like these!!! Sprint FTW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[statickeith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jayjaync  forgot the Droid...<br>and "released", not "realised".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jayjaync]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin <br>I knew it wasn't going to be called Galaxy S Pro. Like I said on the leaked photos post from a few days ago, Sprint is going for shorter, more catchy names for there 4G phones like the EVO. Epic 4G is an excellent name for this device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benthe1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin  epic? ha, looks like every other phone samsung has. People say blackberrys look bad, this thing looks like a toy. ev-do and wi-max? big deal. hspa+ and LTE, yes please. <br><br>IMOHO this thing is far from epic, it is just another next gen device that htc and moto will out doo in the coming months. <br><br>Oh and the evo looks 100x better than this cheap looking toy. even if both of them are CDMA root phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TerrorX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX  3 iPhones weren't even changed physically. iPhone 4 is still the same, except thinner and aluminium band. Dont you think thats the same?<br>I know its just one phone but if they rene the phone with new eatures, they should also renew the design and layout. iPhone 4's layout is still the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[statickeith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX  Define a smartphone that isn't a toy so then I can rip you apart on how ironically wrong you are please!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rhomaion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin <br>damnit...i wish HTC would make a large flagship qwerty slider like this. I've seen samsungs track record when it comes to continuing to upgrade/support their android (actually all phones in general) and it sucks. I'll always be weary of a samsung branded phone. just can't help it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimbaDogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@benthe1  <br>Also, this will be perfect for those that wanted a physical keyboard on the EVO. Thank you Sprint for coming out with some AWESOME phones lately.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benthe1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jayjaync  good point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Husher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith  Better comparison <a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2010/06/26/samsung-galaxy-s-vs-iphone-4-display-video-comparison/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2010/06/26/samsung-galaxy-s-vs-iphone-4-display-video-comparison/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fourzero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung has confirmed to discontinue Galaxy S on Nov 2010. They will launch Galaxy Q with Android 2.5. (Reference: Samsung's internal docs).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arnoldphone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@arnoldphone  <br><br>Internal code name is M140X. They might not support Galaxy S anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arnoldphone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@simbadogg  it's name is the HTC Vision (Project Emerald) and it will be phone of the year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheHypnotist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin My biggest complaint about the Korean version is not lack of LED flash it's it doesn't seem to come with Swype (AFAICT) also it seems the beta for Swype is over and it can't be downloaded from the developer site and the overall software package.  I prefer the keyboard on the Galaxy S to the iPhone's keyboard, but the iPhone had great word prediction and correction which makes it overall much better.  <br><br>...I know, cool story, what I'm saying is I'd kill for Swype and settle for a hardware keyboard, you probably get both. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rhomaion  I was referring to the design of the phone looking like a entry level plasticy looking piece of shit. Mostly unlike the droid x and evo. anyhow, for the most part you are right the majority of smart phones are really expensive toys, blackberry being the closest thing to an exception. considering it is marketed to business folk rather than teens who want lame ass sound boards and wicked apps like that ak-47 app woot. <br><br>I like android and everything but i need to see some hardware come out. i hate how many phones they are spitting out yet they are all pretty much the same, <br><br>oh, and i will reiterate, EV-DO = hilarious yesterdays joke, WI-MAX is tomorrows joke. good for nothing more than a back-haul for LTE. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TerrorX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin Looks slick, but I wish Samsung would just ship stock Android instead of their lame iphone knockoff skin.  Really cheapens all their devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McPOW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  I forgot to consider/reference the added size/weight due to the hardware keyboard, HTC will have a slimmer and possibly lighter phone with the Evo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40  Good God...the colors on the iPhone look washed out compared to the Sammy.<br>Contrast ratio on iPhone is a FAIL !!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bufbarnaby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith  After watching Apple over the years, specially the last few, it just goes to show they know people are sheep. they release a fundamentally same device every year with some upgrades (some of which should have been there from the beginning i.e. copy and paste and a flash) and people eat it up. they can and will sell millions of iphone4's despite the fact it has some somewhat major design flaws, one of which being the lack of 4g, but there we go again, people are sheep and don't know/care. thats the demographic Apple trys to shoot for, the people who just don't know. filling peoples heads with propaganda and wishful thinking.<br><br>Have fun down ranking me fanboys. don't really care. and yah, i know RIM has some catching up to do, just as apple does too.  At least I know they are doing 4g right, the LTE way. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TerrorX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40  Wow...the iPhone looks washed out. Blacks are not even black ! Engadget is full of it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bufbarnaby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[We knew about the specs and saw the leaked pix already. The question is if Sprint is gonna charge $10/mo for this device like the Evo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[katiedonut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[great build, spacious keyboard and a wonderful wallpaper! ftw :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aamir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[:) :) :) :) :) :):) :) :):) :) :):) :) :)<br>oh, I was just testing out the ":)" key on the Samsung Epic 4G :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[katiedonut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX <br>Why do you choose a rim or google device? You do because it does what you need in a way that you like. Thats the same reason i use my iphone and that really doesn't make me a know nothing sheep.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tobsmonster2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@katiedonut  <br><br>Why wouldn't they? It will have to be charged the same $10 (doesn't really matter for me since I get a 25% discount off my plan but even still $10 isn't that much) for premium 4g unlimited data. The bigger question is how much more the hot spot feature will cost. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doctor Comrade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 4:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX  What do you want Apple to do here, release a 4G phone on LTE when they can't even get UMTS antennas correct?  I'm all for throwing them under the bus on the antenna issue because they screwed up but when they get that under control they will have the goods.  You are correct about WiMax but, from my own perspective, I appreciate that they have the courage to wait until they think a feature is ready to implement it.  I don't think that makes me a fanboy, but to each their own. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paladin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 4:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tobsmonster2  <br>Sooo.. People use Windows because it does what they need in a way that they like?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wello]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bufbarnaby  More like a Sammy fail, I'll take text I can read over more color, plus, the colors of the iPhones LED are fantastic, it's not amoled, but it's the best display is a cellphone. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold Dead Fingers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 5:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bufbarnaby  It doesn't even look like the Italian guy has the iPhone on full brightness though. It would definitely look better if it was. The colors would still be a little less vibrant but not to the extent that they are in that video]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marblewonder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fourzero40  This is SOOO much better than Engadget's.  I'm still waiting for someone to play some actual movies on both.  You can already see from viewing the pictures that the black bars on the iPhone4 still have that washed out LCD look, due to the backlighting.  It's no wonder they changed the default background to a white/grey gradient.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avinash240]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@simbadogg  <br><br>I think your going to see better support for these new phones as these companies now know they can get more shelf life out of a cell phone design by just updating the software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 8:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fowenati  Best of both Worlds (touch & slider keyboards) and only slightly thicker? What's not to love? ^_^ .....and DLNA will work with a Sony PS3 and your router to PC too. Would be great for Steve iHitler Jobs to project his ugly finger pointing face on all the screens throughout his house. He could keep tabs on the competition with his "Thought Police" carrying these units around to punish iPhone 4 defectors by shocking them w/ iPhone 4's built-in self stun gun. Oh.... but wait, Samsung didn't include the DLNA feature when they made Apple's Hummingbird A8 Droidless Clone! *_^]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Teh Ripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@katiedonut  <br>They will- the $10 a month is for 4G services, not just the EVO device. As much as it sucks, they're gonna nail us with charges every way possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[choffman1995]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith  <br>Ever take a look at sprint's 4g map?<br>If not you should, basically it skips every populated place in the entire country.<br>They are on a roll alright, a roll of in marketing deception.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcar302]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 9:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin <br><br>Not impressed with samsung build quality OR their ability to implement anything software-wise.  I had an upstage, the instinct was terrible (both versions)  the moment is passable, but squeaky and cheap feeling outside of a case - bulky inside one.<br>I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt because I know they _can_ put out good hardware, but I'm not holding my breath.<br>I was a huge proponent of hardware keyboards until the Evo and it's glorious 4.3" on-screen offering.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xenoterranos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin <br><br>Epic indeed! Sprints really is the kept secret in wireless!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX<br>Why does any phone need 4g when the 3g potential still hasn't been met? It makes no sense. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maattp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@simbadogg  <br><br>Your like me... This is my problem with samsung as well... You get virtually no support... So when it comes to upgrading ur android software u may be in trouble.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngzayiles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@katiedonut  More than likely.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TerrorX  <br>I'm sorry I fail to see how this looks like any other Android device currently out, given that high end phones WITHOUT a keyboard is rare in itself and the 2nd/3rd to be released with a keyboard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtbatol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ericlin: More like Epic Mediocracy.<br><br>Enough is enough with these stupid Android hardware statistics. It is now plainly obvious that Android marketers are shilling stats in place of true utility and usability. Whatever the numbers are, you can be sure they cut corners all around.<br><br>In other words, cheap crap for deeks (d*cks pretending to be geeks). <br><br>Real geeks are sufficiently solvent buy Apple for themselves and use whatever crap their shortsighted employers buy for 'value'.<br><br>That's an Epic Fail.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cgpublic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ariel Bender  <br>stfu already you stupid apple sackriding idiot.<br>you are the one who is total FAIL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@maattp  <br><br>If you are fortunate enough to be in a WiMax area like I am, it's been fantastic. This weekend, I was sitting in a coffee shop watching USA vs Ghana over 4G on SprintTV. I was in South Pasadena, which is about 10 miles northeast of Los Angeles. Though LA has been announced as getting WiMax up this year, they've been gradually rolling it out over various parts of the area, and not just LA city proper. I know I'm one of the lucky few, but I do believe Sprint/Clear are working double-time to get WiMax rolled out to all the cities they've announced, and their efforts are showing here in LA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alain]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 28th 2010 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rhomaion  Droid.. its not a toy.. its a BEAST]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Autobots]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2010 3:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@maattp  3G potential?? Dude 3G is already a bottleneck. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[conCERN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2010 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@McPOW  And this one has flash for its camera...such a downer for the normal Galaxy S.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2010 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/28/samsungs-epic-4g-for-sprint-seems-to-live-up-to-its-name/</guid><description><![CDATA[@arnoldphone  Yes because that makes complete sense to discontinue a phone 3 months after you release it to the public. ??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rhomaion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2010 12:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
