<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow and sony gets blamed with stealing controller ideas?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrolls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jrolls <br>Just like Apple didn't invent multitouch, Sony didn't invent six-axis.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PBB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jrolls just like how the concept of a UI and touch screens wasn't invented by apple or microsoft (it was presented by my uncle to SJ and BG)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakemochas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PBB  but sony was the first to have a six-axis accelerometer]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrolls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jrolls Wow and nobody cares]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[encler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jrolls  <br><br>and it came out before the wii]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ps3 rocks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like could make things interesting in the high strung fast world of remotes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chewy71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds like it could be a cube remote-- you know, six inertial orientations and all. Could make for an interesting form factor. Maybe shape it like a fuzzy dice and make it soft and indestructible? Market it as family friendly and easy to use. I can see that working. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zhangyuan18]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmm I wonder how much it will cost though....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac Montenegro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shadowmance22 Probably the price of a zune ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now no matter which way you hold it, someone can't say "you're holding it wrong".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loadoftoad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loadoftoad <br><br>lol.. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TechAndOnlyTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure about the touch screen idea for a remote. I normally watch movies etc in a darkened room & would prefer not to have an annoying display light up and break the mood. It's not that hard to find a button you want by feel with the right layout of keys.<br><br>The six axis thing could be interesting though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nathanjdillon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nate Dogg Touchscreen remotes are generally designed for non-technical folk.  People who want to touch "Play Blu-Ray" rather than manually power up the TV, movie player, and stereo, and set the TV and stereo's input.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreamwriter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nate Dogg According to how it was explained in the article, the six axis thing would not work with a control that is not touch screen. So this control has to have both (touch screen + six axis) or else it wouldn't be anything new. <br><br>Btw way I like the area codes(hoes) song, good job.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[This just seems like a DOA thing to me. Kinet tech will become cheaper, and this won't even get the chance to be popular.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Very Powerfull Codfish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Very Powerfull Codfish <br><br>While Kinect is cool and I may get one I don't think its practical to change channels with on a tv.<br><br>Imaging waving your arms around like a tard, or drawing the numbers 4 and 3 to change the channel to 43; or better grab a simple remote control and press 4 and 3.  Which sounds more convenient?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loadoftoad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@loadoftoad  <br><br>While you'd be wasting time trying to draw 4 and 3 with your hands, i would simply say "Kinect, change to channel 43"  and there you have it, channel 43 without having to move anything but my lips and strain my vocal cords.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still can't wait for the (Iron man - like) technology. Not specifically the robot, but the "computer" technology, it looked awesome]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[shit things just got real!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pinktacoyummm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 1:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL That's all you need for a patent?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trickymaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 2:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is this patentable? I have a clock that Google gave as a promo item years ago that used an orientation sensor to determine the device's function. Turn it on one side, it was a basic clock, the other a calendar, and so on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hmlong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 3:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[@isights Welcome to the world of patents where its not about who did it first but who filed for the papers first smh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaque14K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 7:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[After several rounds of reading this post, I still have no clue what the patent covers or what the device type it's referring to would even look like.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LANjackal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Microsoft patent application proposes six-axis remote that's buttered on both sides]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/06/microsoft-patent-application-proposes-six-axis-remote-thats-but/</guid><description><![CDATA[Next console.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HektikLyfe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2010 12:33PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
