<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[So are we completely skipping 3.0? I was actually looking forward to the features of 3.0...mainly the higher throughput and higher range.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teerim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim Crap, I lied, cat connectivity was the feature to look for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teerim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim  <br><br>what the crap are you talking about?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim<br><br>"Outside of Samsung's Wave, we're having a hard time thinking of a meaningful device that has shipped with Bluetooth 3.0 onboard."<br><br>Umm, Engadget, are you completely ignoring the Nokia N8? it has Bluetooth 3.0 and is one of THE MOST anticipated devices of 2010! Geez!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[statickeith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith  That *HAS* shipped, not has BEEN ANNOUNCED.<br><br>However, what Engadget misses is that the Galaxy S has been available in countless countries and has bluetooth 3.0.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith the N8 is one attractive piece of hardware.  The OS and UI scare me though.  S60 was a nightmare at times. My 3 months with the N97 was horrible.  Never have I appreciated my Android phone more, the OS I once denounced in its 1.5 days.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iamsupreme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim <br>4.0?! I barely have 2.0!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonnyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim My Acer 1830T has 3.0.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayayess1190]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iamsupreme <br><br>I like the camera ofthe n8, but the device itself looks like a sidekick without the slideout keyboard or a first gen DS with a screen on the front]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mentat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iamsupreme<br><br>I'm in the same boat as you. My 5800 is giving me a hard time to work with. However, Symbian^3 is supposed to be improving on symbian s60 5th. S60 on non touch screen was much better. However, when it was translated into a touch-friendly OS, the result was horrible. Tons of mistakes were present. And S^3 is just Symbian without all those mistakes. So Nokia has learned from it's mistakes (hopefully) and people who have actually had a chance to play with the prototype were more than pleased to use it. They thought symbian 3 was a huge improvement and so IMO, N8 won't be that bad which is why I'm lookin forward to buying that beauty (coz I'm a camera and music freak and I like Nokia too)<br><br>:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[statickeith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jayayess1190  ...again, "meaningful", reading for comprehension doesn't seem to be this threads' strong suit.  Bluetooth is nice in a computer but it doesn't have nearly the benefits that comes in/with a phone (mostly due to hands-free requirements), IMHO, even if you do enjoy some music or other things through the bluetooth.  Again, it mostly matters even on the utilization level.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@statickeith.  I'm in the same boat.  Have a 5800XM...very capable with lot's of features at the time...but doggy...with an awkward UI .  From what I see, Symbian^3 takes all the advantages of the OS and packages them in a modern UI.  Symbian^4 is supposed to take the smartphone OS to a new level, but since apps with be backward compatible within the Qt framework...the N8 is going to be an excellent addition with long legs.  I'm glad that Nokia is taking a bit more time to ensure the N8 performance at launch is smooth.  It seems the market is so hyper-competitive these days, many products are getting rushed out the door prematurely (e.g.: iPhone 4).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Engadget Fan 89]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 4:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim <br>You know, with how small this device can be and how small its battery could be, I'm maybe thinking of a solar powered bluetooth memory stick pen!! Or is that just a dream too far, could be some sort of badge!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theevil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 4:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Outside of Samsung's Wave, we're having a hard time thinking of a meaningful device that has shipped with Bluetooth 3.0 onboard. <br><br>Wait! what? <br><br>>>> Samsung Galaxy S ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmed Alzayani]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teerim And people think that Android moves forward too fast...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NikAmi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this Sparta?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CCarmichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CCarmichael Lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SskyNnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will someone work on the battery tech please...please!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[prmd142]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@GreenLeaf <br><br>How about energy in general? It would be the most beneficial investment. I'm sure everyone's tired of hearing about oil and lithium, just like VHS is vanishing because of DVDs, and now Blu-ray is taking over.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan420]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ryan420  <br><br>Nah, blu-ray is still really a niche thing, because they are so expensive. The average person still probably hesitant to pay the $15-20 for a regular DVD. And unless they got a PS3 or went out and bought a standalone blu-ray player... they cannot play those. DVDs will be around for a long while... Blu-ray is like getting the beamer of the chevy.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dell Ibedaboss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dellibedaboss  <br><br>*over the Chevy ... *doh*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dell Ibedaboss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dellibedaboss  <br>I'm from the uk, and blue-ray and DVD are pretty much the same price, i didnt think i was going to get into blue-ray for years but i now have a quite  good sized blue-ray collection! I mean some of them are not as cheap as standard DVD's, but actually match the price of the special addition DVD's, but then almost every Blue-ray i have bought has all the special addition stuff on it anyway!! Is it the same in America???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theevil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 4:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[might NOT be an eternity from now..but when it comes waiting for shiny new tech, it ALWAYS feels like it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[voicemailradio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[so wat is the point of this??? . . . It gives no specs of bluetooth 4.0 it self & it never said it was bluetooth class 1 to extend range & I'm guessing the mbps transfer rate stays the same 2 keep it "low power" . . . Sooo yeaaa]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LaserGuidedSocks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[if you are not getting max speed you are holding it wrong!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lord voldemort]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lord voldemort Shut the fuck up<br>Im sick and tired of all these iphone 4 jokes.<br>I have been to the apple store and have the iphone and havnt actually seen this problem once and have tried all the "wrong" ways of holding it.<br>Havnt lost one bar<br>And yea im posting this from my iphone while holding it the "wrong" way]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benappelhof]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@benappelhof  don't get your panties in a twist.  Most sites report that the antenna issues are unequal between phones, of course if that's true Apple will showcase phones in the store that don't show the problem.  Additionally, perhaps they are finally (and quietly) doing something about it such as a special coating to avoid the attenuation due to touching the antenna with your hands directly.  <br><br>These things don't negate an obvious design flaw.  I am glad your device works and suits you well, but your attitude is unnecessary.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez Yes sorry for the over reaction<br>Just a little fed up that people are so one sided in the way that they have to dog for flaws in other phone os's to make theres better<br>Me i like android and ios4 i was going to wait for the droid x untilmthis came out.<br>The big reason i got this is because i want to use face time with my relitives and i dont know about another phone with this well designed of a feature]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benappelhof]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@benappelhof  No problem, it wasn't the greatest of jokes and getting old, I agree with your sentiment even though I'm not a big fan of Apple these days.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Engadget, Galaxy S has shipped over 1million units worldwide and has Bluetooth 3.0.  200K in Korea sales alone in 10 days.  <br><br>Once it gets into the US it'll have upwards of 2M internationally.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez <br><br>Officials added that Samsung has already received 1 million PRE-ORDERS from the operators (not from customers).<br><br>They maybe will reach that amount of units sold maybe in some months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[josuearisty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 7:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JAG  Firstly, I said shipped intentionally.  Secondly, in SK, a market much smaller than the EU and the US, has *sold*, again an intentional and important use of proper terms here (though to further add, in SK Samsung does have an ability to book sales early, but all reports were of the device actually selling out every day for the first 5 days available in SK).  Their first market they entered, was Singapore, Singtel sold out of the device on the launch weekend....<br><br>Needless to say, I'm pretty confident with my appraisal of the situation and with the 2M quote, I'm adding less than 1M *shipments* to 5 carriers in the US which is very conservative.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@juanvaldez  Further clarification on the way Samsung books sales in Korea, IIRC when they ship something to their corporate stores they count this as a sale, and when they ship to their partners (read: carriers) they don't book the sale.  <br><br>*I put this separate because I'm only 60% sure IRC and it's not very important/doesn't affect the numbers much do to the initial sell-outs. <br><br>Again, within the first 2-3 months this device is available in SK alone it should push 1M in *sales* (not shipments).  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[where's that blue tooth cat pic, I liked that one better]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WinXP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh snap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunda Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously, does anyone REALLY care about this? <br><br>How about reducing power consumption of phone components that actually affect the battery, like the screen. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stylux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped It's a nice added benefit, nothing that will be a make or break to most users, but to some maybe, and with all things equal then it can be a deciding factor.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped Bluetooth isn't just used in phones. The low power (Wibee) is for things like sensors. These may be made with alternative charge methods such as small solar panels, power from motion/vibration or power from radio waves. If a traditional button cell is used the sensor could last up to a year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peterthorpe81]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 5:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Spaceshipped <br><br>Oled??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ps3 rocks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks like a young Ruth Evershed from Spooks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[antron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[Obviously its still got some issues.. Looks like she's having hearing the output. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 3:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe the Galaxy-S smartphones with Android (Samsung) have BT3. I guess the thing is, what does it offer (and what is supported) with this in contrast to BT2.1 on practical devices?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 7:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[And you guys went crazy when Microsoft doubted about 3.0+ for Windows 8...<br>Everything happens for a reason, yes, even Vista...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hm9408]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2010 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[... so wait buying usb 3.0 laptops (pc')]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xslavic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2010 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[but how we dispose the old things ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xslavic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2010 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bluetooth 4.0 specification gets official, devices expected by Q4 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/07/bluetooth-4-0-specification-gets-official-devices-expected-by-q/</guid><description><![CDATA[my microsoft bluetooth mouse 5000 still has lag in windows 7 with bluetooth 2.0 EDR]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xslavic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 26th 2010 7:21AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
