<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cj likes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CJisohsocool OMG! Ive been waiting for this review....<br><br>I think im wayyyyy tooo trusting of Engadget...lol. Ok Time to read.<br><br>Been really looking for power and portability, hope this is it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ComboBreaker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComboBreaker  <br>For a 14 inch, this thing is light!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[egress63]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[It has onboard DVD drive.<br><br>MEGAFAIL.<br><br>Small lappies should use all that space for guts/refrigeration and battery.<br><br>Who uses optical drive anyway nowadays? Makes no sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doutorpiranha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@doutorpiranha  <br><br>Mega fail? you don't get full voltage laptops any thinner than this, the DVD drive is icing on the cake.<br><br> I had a pretty good look at the i7 model, very impressive spec, BUT quite a cheap looking machine up close, that's a turn-off. the plastic keyboard looks and feels cheap/mushy as well, not as good as 4810 timeline series.<br><br>but for almost half the price of a similarly spec'ed macpro/vaio z, it's a pretty good deal, if looks is a non-factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m0m0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CJisohsocool - This CJ likes it as well. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MRCUR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@doutorpiranha  <br><br>You should be reported for having too low IQ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[huzzlehoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Exec that decided glossy screens would be better needs to be stoned!          ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DefPo3t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet <br><br>The person who went to 16:9 ratio for notebook screens should be left on a remote planet.<br><br>Instead of 1440x900 we get 1366x768, instead of 1920x1200 we get 1920x1080. Not everyone just watches HD video on their laptops, some of us actually use them for work and need the extra screen real estate.<br><br>Even Dell stopped making business laptops that support WUXGA. Gah.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet Amen and AMEN!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cpd5c45]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BigNerd  <br>And AMEN to you, sir!  16:9.  Does not help when working with top-end monitors, as most of them are 16:10.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet <br><br>consumers decided glossy screens would reign, because they look sharper and more crisp under ambient light in stores.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tybert7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 6:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DefPoet You are both correct, but you have to remember that glossier screens and lower resolution screens are like sex: Both sell a bit too well.<br><br><br>It's not much different from the way televisions are sold at BestBuy.  BB employees jack up the contrast and brightness ratios to levels that you'd never actually use in the living room.  Yet, people are naturally attracted to what's brighter.  With lower glossy screens, it's about what's shinier and with lower res screens, it's all about what's more affordable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zeth006]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2010 12:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I knew it before reading :<br>Good idea,bad build quality. Same with almost all Acer laptops.<br>Too bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwi32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[To be honest, considering that the i7-640um (a ULV processor) clocks about as high as the i3-350m with turbo boost, and considering how much battery power it'd save, it's disappointing that they went with a non-ULV processor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Zey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is the heat mitigation on this thing? I currently have a Dell XPS M1330 and, at this point, the thing gets so freaking hot that I can't use it for more than 20 minutes on my lap, or about an hour anywhere else.<br><br>I'm looking for a new laptop, but I'm worried about getting stuck with another laptop that's going to burn my legs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BacteriaEP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BacteriaEP I use a logitech cooling pad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giriz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BacteriaEP As I said in the review, it was mostly cool, but with CPU intensive tasks it got warm on the bottom left corner. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  <br><br>Yeah I read the full review, I'm just looking for more detailed information. Sorry I'm just really worried about getting a fiery laptop again.<br><br>Does it get uncomfortably warm, or just noticeably? Is there anything on the top or the keyboard?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BacteriaEP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@giriz  <br><br>Yeah I have a cooling pad as well. Doesn't help accept that it keeps the heat directly off my legs. Still though the M1330 is aluminum, or something, on the top which acts as it's own sort of heat sink. So after about 30+ minutes the entire keyboard and mouse become uncomfortable to use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BacteriaEP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got this on tuesday, I disagree with your take on the build. Mine is very sturdy and doesn't have the squeaking or bending issues you had on your keyboard.<br>Also, mine was a different model, the 3697, which was equipped with an 2.4ghz i5. Mine can play source games pretty reliably with the intel hd gpu on max performance. i'm talking steady 60 frames with vert. sync on.<br>Mine also has the 9 cell battery, which has lasted mine the promised 10.5 to 11 hours of battery life.<br>The only downside i can really find about this laptop is that it was impossible to get both a dedicated gpu and 9 cell battery.<br>Also, the thing is a fingerprint magnet. MAGNET. It comes with it's own micro-fiber cleaning pad...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eschmacher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BacteriaEP  <br><br>Ugh except... not accept. Don't know what I was thinking there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BacteriaEP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although I am used to the quality of a ThinkPad, I think that Acer has come a long way with their build quality, I would still never purchase one, but If they keep it up, I might one day consider them. I was surprised to see aluminum to be used in the notebook, although the keyboards on them are horrible. I think it makes for a nice entry level college notebook, or maybe just High School. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rstoplabe14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rstoplabe14<br><br>You'd still never purchase one, but then maybe one day you'd consider one? <br><br>We need to get this guy to run for office!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shaynes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shaynes  <br>I see your point, I was a little of a hypocrite, but what I meant to say was that if they get their build quality up to par with others I might actually consider one in the future, but right now, the build quality of my T61 is like no other.<br><br>Office? C'mon, its not like i said I'm sorry to BP]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rstoplabe14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will you be reviewing the smaller (11.6 inch) AS1830T?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mogren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mogren <br>The AS180T was available for $520 shipped a couple weeks ago, which I thought was a steal for an i3 thin/light of this caliber.  After this review, I'm sure of it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Spray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mogren Doubtful, too similar to the Aspire One 721 I just reviewed in design. But it has similar components to this one, from the reviews it seems it has a slightly longer battery life...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  Thanks Joanna, I will weave your reviews together in my mind and consider it reviewed :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mogren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  That's disappointing because the 1810 was one of the best laptops you could buy and I expect that the 1830 will follow in its footsteps. I get 8-9hours of battery life on my 1810, BTW.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Min]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Companies like Acer and Asus should have a $100 option on all their laptops for a "premium screen" that is a higher resolution and better viewing angle (and has matte as an option to appease the relentless engadget editors... I feel like I will be stoned to death for saying I LIKE the glossy for the darker blacks/richer colors)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StimulationEngineer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Josh S<br><br>You oughtta be!  No, I'm kidding, but seriously, no amount of gloss will make the contrast and the richness of colors match even a reasonably decent desktop monitor.  Personally, I'd take a reduction in the perceived levels of those things in exchange for the increased overall usability of a matte screen.  When your reds are orangish, your greens are yellowish, and your blues are greenish, you're just never going to get decent colors.<br><br>I have a year-old Acer Timeline and really, the screen is pretty abysmal.  The contrast between it and a mid-range Samsung TN display is stunning, about the same as the contrast between that desktop TN and a wide-gamut IPS Dell.  I'd happily increase the thickness of a laptop in order to get a better display.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2010 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I meant AS1830T, the 11.6" model.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Spray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Best netbook to buy:<br><br>ASUS Eee PC 1215N..... EASILY.<br><br>1.8 dual core processor<br>ION 2, with a +5,400 3DMark 03 score!<br>NVIDIA OPTIMUS<br>Chiclet keyboard<br>Matte lid<br>7-hr battery<br>less than $500<br>Privacy webcam toggle<br><br>... can't wait for the August launch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TareG <br><br>I've been waiting on this one as well. But honestly, this will come down to $$ for me.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tva77433]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The one with the ATI 5650 is on my short list.  I wonder how battery life would be in comparison, assuming most use is on the included integrated graphics.<br><br>Ideally, I still want a 13.3" thin laptop with a decent graphics chip, but I'm beginning to give up on that.<br><br>I still wish Alienware would release something like an M11x in 13" form factor.  An m13x would get my money.<br><br>I'm holding out until August I think.  I keep hoping some "back to school" products will come out closer to what I want.  But this one is definitely interesting.<br><br>Nice review.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@andysexton I am in the same boat.  I want something with a decent GPU in the 12-14" range.  I dont want to haul around a 10lb 18.4" bohemoth!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sethmo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sethmo  <br>ASUS Eee PC 1215N]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TareG  I don't see how an Atom netbook with low powered GPU at 12" is anywhere close to what I'm looking for, which is a 13-14" thin and light with a mid powered CPU w/mid powered graphics chip.  But thanks anyway :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm looks good. Anyone wanna buy my laptop?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ddub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why no numeric review scores on the actual review page Engadget?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[resource]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@resource Review score is to the right of the review. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joanna Stern  Holy crap I'm a moron.<br><br>Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[resource]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This notebook is OK - but it has a much more interesting younger brother, the TimelineX 3820TG. Some advantages are:<br><br>- No CD drive<br>- Two fans/ heatsinks<br>- Resolution more native on 13" display<br>- Lighter by 0.4 kg <br>- Tighter keyboard layout<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ftgeneral]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ftgeneral Thanks, looking at that one now, too.  Looks like it can also be had with the ATI 5650.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ftgeneral I've been looking at the 3820tg but can only find the model without the GPU :( I pefer the 13" over this 14" with the GPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phuz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@andysexton  <br><br>It is a much more desirable machine. I have had the 3820TG-5454G32iks (Core i5 450M, ATI HD5650, $850). <a href="http://bit.ly/aTB4Zy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aTB4Zy</a><br><br>The switching works great, theres almost no heat in 2D operation, the keyboard is not even slightly flexible.<br><br>But the shiny bezel and glossy screen are pretty annoying on all of these laptops. I hope to god they fire the guy that keeps designing these... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ftgeneral]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@phuz  Sorry, wrong link, mine is iks, not nks. This is mine here: <a href="http://bit.ly/d1VuYK" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/d1VuYK</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ftgeneral]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ftgeneral  The problem is that I can't seem to find anybody selling the 3820TG in the states yet.<br><br>Some people seem to be importing for reasonably prices, and digging through Engadget it seems like they've announced them to eventually hit the US:<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/22/acer-aspire-timeline-x-laptops-arrive-stateside-sans-ulv-process/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/22/acer-aspire-timeline-x-laptops-arrive-stateside-sans-ulv-process/</a><br><br>So maybe soon they'll show up here somewhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/09/acer-timelinex-4820t-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@andysexton  You can check the forum here: <a href="http://bit.ly/akE5DT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/akE5DT</a><br><br>I know its a big thread, but there are lots of people ordering these abroad - i think theyre even on sale in Canada! Personally got mine in Russia and there are stores here that would ship via DHL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ftgeneral]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2010 1:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
