<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Dark Knight reference = WIN<br><br>Begun these 4G wars have. So now theres <br><br>1) Console Wars<br>2) Provider/4G Wars<br>3) Phone Wars<br><br>Love it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrookLynnsFinest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest I think the 4G war is the silliest one.<br><br>Who cares if it's not "true" 4G? It's fast as lightning.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon.athan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JONNNathannn  <br><br>I don't care to be honest. Where did I ever say that it wasn't?  However I have heard that exact statement from other people on Engadget.<br><br>And just like its typical to find people saying that WiMax isn't 4G (I'll defer to the truly informed people) to decide that one .From the little I know though I don't believe WiMax qualifies as 4G. I've heard it explained as just wider and bigger WiFi.<br><br>What's even more amusing though is that in the latest spread of verizon articles you've got commentators saying that that even LTE isn't 4G...<br><br>So what the heck is 4G?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrookLynnsFinest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest <br><br>Also:<br><br>[Name of Middle East Country] War<br>War on Drugs<br>War on Poverty<br>War on Famine<br>War on Sexism<br>War on Racism<br>War on War<br>War on Child Porn<br>War on Human Trafficking<br>War on the Internet<br>War on Net Neutrality<br><br>Am I the only one who hates war and wished that Humanity could just, not be dumb?<br><br>I took this way too seriously.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teslanaut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest <br>Correct. WiMAX and even the first LTE networks aren't 4G (maybe to a marketer but certainly not a wireless engineer). The technical term being touted is "3.9G". <br><br>To be truly 4G it needs to be capable of 100Mbps - 1Gbs and have a fully IP-based core.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest I like this side of you normally I just downrank you for your blind love of Apple. As long as its fast who cares about if its real or not you can only expect so much from a mobile provider  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean Marc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest some council has to approve something as 4g if its submitted to them. One of the standards is 100mb download mobile and 1gb fixed location. Wimax 2 will cover the 100mb. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Openwave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit  Bingo.  Which means that 4G is just a cool sounding name that makes marketing easier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RockTripod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest  LTE and WiMax use the same hardware, it's just the software that makes them different.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SarnGate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest <br><br>My friend... None of them are 4G. They use that for marketing purposes. They all 3G. It's just a new hardware that boost 3G that's all. It's just to catch peoples attention that's all. And it's also a stepping stone towered 4G.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freddy2Fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teslanaut  <br>since you got serious then this is the solution to the war problem<br>its long but interesting<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9rLpHt3bL4&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9rLpHt3bL4&feature=related</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[newjaruz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xbit, I have no idea why you're being ranked up, you do not know what the heck you're talking about. the speed of the network has nothing to do with 3G, 4G. By that logic, At&t's 3G isn't really "3G" since it is less consistent than Sprint's and Verizon's 3G and is slower. 4G is the next generation wireless, NETWORK, just like 3G was the then next generation wireless, NETWORK. Who cares what some random engineer thinks, 4G was certified by the wireless commission. By the way, Wimax in general IS capable of 100Mbps, Wimax-2 (802.16m) which is the next version is backward compatible with 802.16e which is the current Wimax. Software will enable 802.16m. Just like EVDO Rev-A was backward compatible with the "slower speed" EVDO Rev-O, via software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3t3b2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SarnGate, NOT TRUE!  LTE 700Mhz is GSM, the old analog radio frequencies. Wimax is new infrastructure, 2.5Ghz. LTE-Advanced which is 2.5Ghz as well, (Sprint and Clear are interested in LTE-Advanced) is similar to Wimax.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[p3t3b2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 12:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Teslanaut  War is part of Humanity. DEAL WITH IT.<br>From day 1, Babamomo hit Yayamomo over the head with a stick because he wants his cave.<br><br>War is everywhere. You go to WAR every time you fight with another person.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrScope]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@BrookLynnsFinest<br><br>"The Dark Knight"<br><br>You called?  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Freddy2Fred Your wrong, they're not 3G. They're pre-4G. They aren't certified as 3G anymore than they are 4G.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cloud858rk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JONNNathannn AT&T can't say anything about it not being true 4g their 3G coverage is junk]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cloud858rk <br><br>My friend... They are 3.9G. It's too early for 4G anyways... It dosent exist. It's gonna be couple of years from now to have 4G. Research it buddy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freddy2Fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 9:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[woooooo tmobile]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's not as fast, but it sure is cheaper!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sprint will like to challenge you on that "cheaper" comment]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ComboBreaker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComboBreaker  <br><br>Sprint's "4G" isn't as fast as TMo's HSPA+, at least currently.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shooter McGavin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComboBreaker <br><br>Sprint also has a 4G tax of $10, even if your city doesn't have 4G yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[madison540]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComboBreaker  I looked for Sprint to take that challenge, since my TMobile contract is over and there's better Sprint coverage in my area. I was hoping they could be cheaper...<br><br>Unfortunately, they lost.<br><br>Unless there's some secret plan offerings they have (or if you have a grandfathered-in deal), I haven't found anything less expensive than TMO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ComboBreaker I think you are solely referencing unlimited pricing. I think none of the big 4 get as cheap as tmo does with their bottom tier pricing and even better their prepaid pricing (I am excluding whatever sprint subsidiaries because I forget their names and how competitive their prices are) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[juanvaldez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@madison540  <br><br>The $10 "tax" isn't just for 4G.  It also includes true unlimited data and USB tethering.  The 4G service is good enough in my area that I'm contemplating canceling Comcast and using my Evo as the primary internet connection at home.  $80 a month for cell service, home broadband and 3G/4G mobile data is an amazing deal, and no other carrier is even close.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakep_82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jakep82 I've been tethering with my rotted G1 for nearly 2 years. And I'd like to see someone say T-Mobile's data isn't truly unlimited. I've used mega amounts of data with downloads over tethering and I have never been capped. I pay $45 unl minutes (half of family plan) + $25 data and $3.99 for 400 texts. I've been getting 3G for more than a year and with this HSPA in my city (St. Louis) I will def be upgrading to a capable phone in a few months to take advantage of it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brigini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@brigini I tether with my palm pre. Sprint 450 unlimited text. Web. An everything in between with unltd mble to mble 69.99. How is that nt cheaper then tmbles?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[saddam3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 11:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[Soooo can't wait till it comes to the UK!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yeoldgreat1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@yeoldgreat1 <br>I meant 4G]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yeoldgreat1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad t-mobile doesnt advertise their amazing speed upgrades]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inspiron41]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@inspiron41 <br><br>you mean like in my speed test from my phone in chicago???????<br><br>CUZ I AINT SEEING IT!<br><br>DL .27 Mb UL .12 Mb ping 117 ms<br><br> I request, NAY, demand a refund]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lowdrag  I live in small town outside of Austin and am getting 3.5-4.2Mbps down and 0.4-0.6 up.  My friend lives about 3 miles away and has 4G coverage at his house and doesn't get that with his EVO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StuckInTexas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[i'll take a 3g network with 4g speeds that will work on current phones right now then (theoretically) faster down the line 4g network that need new cell radios ANYDAY OF THE FUCKING WEEK]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jazir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jazir5 <br>The network T-Mobile is working with will also provide faster speeds to those on 3G. It won't be 4G speeds, but there's a speed increase. They have it in Philadelphia where I live and it's pretty fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballistic90]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jazir5 Which of their current handsets are + compatible?  I'm hearing different things from "none yet" to "all current 3G models".  Anyone know?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MBN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MBN  <br><br>None of the current handsets are technically hsdpa+. But ALL of their 3g handsets will benefit from the speeds. Sweet indeed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gmaxx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[according to Tmo-news, magenta is already disscussing LTE. death of WiMAX seems imminent. At  least before the EVO will be the next G1  before this is actually happens]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee1019]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lee1019 The death of an equally fast and probably mergable network from a strong competitor "imminent". Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight<br><br>if one of the 4g networks dies it'll be as long and bloody as hd-dvd vs bluray]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jazir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lee1019 oh also nice engrish. this is actually happens right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jazir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jazir5  When I say Imminent I mean the next five to eight years.  WiMAX is convertible to LTE by  software. HSPA+ just seems like old news already. I'll watch my grammar in future posts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee1019]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can't call it 4G if it's, you know, *not* 4G. <br><br>Sent from my HTC Evo 4G ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunda Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ThundaChunky but you can call it pathetic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xChillOutx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ThundaChunky <br>Then you can't call LTE or WiMAX 4G cause, you know, neither of them conform to 4G standards...<br><br>Dumbass.<br><br>HSPDA+ has just as much right to call itself 4G as WiMAX and LTE. And in case you start shouting "Fanbois dendz teh t-mobilez!!1!" I am from the UK, so it doesn't affect me in any way, I just hate it when misinformed idiots talk down to strangers due to incorrect information]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vidoardes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@vidoardes  <br><br>Relax sunshine, I'm very much well aware that 'true' 4G has to be rolled out and I don't believe I said anything about LTE or WiMAX being 'true' 4G either. I was merely commenting on what was reported because I got an ironic chuckle out of it. No need to get your knickers in a twist, mate. <br><br>(Sorry about that, but I couldn't pass on an *imitate what I think a Brit would say* opportunity)<br><br>Sent from my HTC Evo 4G]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunda Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ThundaChunky<br>what is funny is though that your message tags says you sent from your Evo 4G which is not 4G.. how ironic is that :)  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rholden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[When is tmobile going to deploy an EDGE network that covers everyone?  You can't leave a major city without dropping to a G after about 15 miles.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heavy Metal Machine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 7:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Heavy Metal Machine I wonder how far you have to drive out of a major metro area till CDMA providers drop down to 1xRTT? which falls somewhere between GRPS and EDGE speed wise. Do many CDMA phones even indicate that they've dropped down to 1xRTT?<br><br>The company I work for has Sprint "broadband" PCMCIA cards and even INSIDE the Tampa metro area i have seen these cards drop to 1xRTT. I haven't taken one outside of the metro area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0ug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Heavy Metal Machine Also have to wonder how good ATT's 3G coverage. I don't own an iphone. but screen shots i have seen of them don't have any kind of indication to tell you if you are in GRPS, EDGE, UMTS, HSPA, HSPA+ coverage. I wonder how many complaints about ATT's network stems from dropping back down to GPRS/EDGE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0ug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/21/t-mobiles-hspa-blankets-85-million-americans-in-warm-4g-comf/</guid><description><![CDATA[@d0ug If you are in an edge area an E will be displayed. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doasis23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 21st 2010 8:57AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
