Amazon Kindle DX Graphite review
Just over a year ago, we reviewed Amazon's jumbo-sized Kindle, the Kindle DX. And just a few weeks ago, Amazon outed a new, $379 Graphite gray version of the DX. This time, it's got the new Pearl display from E Ink, which supposedly boasts a much higher contrast ratio and a faster page refresh rate over its predecessor. Other than that, you're looking at pretty much the same unit as before, and if you like a large e-reader, that's probably a good thing. Read on for our full impressions of the device.
Look and feel
Yes, the new Kindle DX, like its predecessor, feels rather giant in comparison to most readers. That said, in our several weeks with the device, we grew accustomed to its size pretty easily and found it to be a more enjoyable reading experience than with many smaller readers. If you think of it as the difference between reading a cozy, convenient paperback and a large, stately hardback edition, you'll about have the feel of the size and weight difference. The DX feels heavier than the Kindle 2 or the Nook but light in comparison to its overall size, and while you will inevitably hold this reader with both hands, we'll go on record as saying that's how we hold most books -- even small ones -- anyway.
Physically, not much has changed. The Kindle DX's new shell of gray is pretty appealing, and we definitely prefer it to the white housing of other Kindles. As an added bonus, it seems to boost the contrast ratio on the 9.7-inch screen quite a bit (more on the reading experience in a moment). Like the previous DX, the Graphite version is just about a third of an inch thick, weighs nearly 19 ounces (that's over double the Kindle 2), and stores 3,500 books -- just like the other Kindles. The DX's keyboard is unchanged from the original model and, in our opinions, still pretty abysmal. It is simply not very usable and delivers an awkward, uncomfortable typing experience. The unit is simply too wide, and the layout of the keys too cramped to get much done with it. That said, it's a minor complaint as we've never done a lot of typing with our readers anyways, so we'll be just as happy to never really use this keyboard anyway.
The other physical features -- the rocker and the three buttons (page turn arrows and Home) are exactly the same as on every recent Kindle. The brushed aluminum back feels nice in the hand, with a slight texture to it which makes gripping the device with one hand possible (if not totally comfortable).
Performance and reading experience
What's really important about this iteration of the Kindle DX is what's going on inside: or, more specifically, its new Pearl E Ink display that's purported to boast a 50 percent improved contrast ratio than its predecessor. While we don't have the previous generation DX, we do have the Kindle 2 to compare (in addition to the Nook and a first gen Kindle). The new DX has -- by a good margin -- the best contrast ratio of all those devices. This screen is downright crisp; in fact, it might be a bit too crisp for our tastes, mostly because we're so used to looking at cheaply printed books and less attractive E Ink displays. In that way, the DX is a big step forward: it achieves exactly what it claims.
The refresh rate on this big boy is improved, too -- but then, where could it have gone but up? E Ink refresh rates simply cannot compete with LCDs or physical books. Our own experience also found that the refresh rate of the Nook (with its latest software update) is now about on par with this new Kindle refresh rate, so it's fair to say that some of the competition is catching up. Regardless, with this unit, we felt enough latency in the refresh rate to be bothered by it, but e-reader enthusiasts or people who really need to travel with an arsenal or reading material are probably more than willing to let that slide in the face of the other advantages.
One problem that was evident in the first generation Kindle DX persists in this model: the orientation sensor is a bit nuts. While reading The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo in bed, almost any time we adjusted ourselves we found the sensor turning to landscape mode. Then again, when we wanted the sensor to kick in, it would do so only about 60 percent of the time, and again you'll see the effects of slow page refresh times of E Ink. Now, you can lock the orientation sensor and pretty much never encounter this issue again (we can't ever really imagine needing to read a text-based book with adjustable font sizes in landscape mode, after all), but it seemed worth mentioning given it goes unchanged since the previous version.
The battery on this thing is what we'd call decent -- it takes quite a while to get a full charge, and lasts about a week of regular use. Amazon says you'll squeeze two weeks out of it with the wireless off, and while we didn't put that to the test, we found the battery life was, as expected, far better with the wireless turned off. You're not going to get the same type of battery life you see out of smaller devices, but for one of this type, it's pretty solid.
Wrap up
Not a lot has changed here -- but Amazon's given a pretty decent upgrade to the DX, a large reader that was originally targeted at students. While there's surely a demographic out there for super-sized devices in general, we're not sure that students on-the-go are the ones for this device. As our previous review of the DX stated, for now at least, a laptop, highlighter, and text still win in most cases. That said, this new $379 DX is definitely an iterative improvement over the last one. If you're a current DX owner, you probably won't feel any need to upgrade, but if you've been thinking about buying one, these improvements might be enough to get you to finally bite.
Look and feel

Physically, not much has changed. The Kindle DX's new shell of gray is pretty appealing, and we definitely prefer it to the white housing of other Kindles. As an added bonus, it seems to boost the contrast ratio on the 9.7-inch screen quite a bit (more on the reading experience in a moment). Like the previous DX, the Graphite version is just about a third of an inch thick, weighs nearly 19 ounces (that's over double the Kindle 2), and stores 3,500 books -- just like the other Kindles. The DX's keyboard is unchanged from the original model and, in our opinions, still pretty abysmal. It is simply not very usable and delivers an awkward, uncomfortable typing experience. The unit is simply too wide, and the layout of the keys too cramped to get much done with it. That said, it's a minor complaint as we've never done a lot of typing with our readers anyways, so we'll be just as happy to never really use this keyboard anyway.
The other physical features -- the rocker and the three buttons (page turn arrows and Home) are exactly the same as on every recent Kindle. The brushed aluminum back feels nice in the hand, with a slight texture to it which makes gripping the device with one hand possible (if not totally comfortable).
Performance and reading experience

The refresh rate on this big boy is improved, too -- but then, where could it have gone but up? E Ink refresh rates simply cannot compete with LCDs or physical books. Our own experience also found that the refresh rate of the Nook (with its latest software update) is now about on par with this new Kindle refresh rate, so it's fair to say that some of the competition is catching up. Regardless, with this unit, we felt enough latency in the refresh rate to be bothered by it, but e-reader enthusiasts or people who really need to travel with an arsenal or reading material are probably more than willing to let that slide in the face of the other advantages.
One problem that was evident in the first generation Kindle DX persists in this model: the orientation sensor is a bit nuts. While reading The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo in bed, almost any time we adjusted ourselves we found the sensor turning to landscape mode. Then again, when we wanted the sensor to kick in, it would do so only about 60 percent of the time, and again you'll see the effects of slow page refresh times of E Ink. Now, you can lock the orientation sensor and pretty much never encounter this issue again (we can't ever really imagine needing to read a text-based book with adjustable font sizes in landscape mode, after all), but it seemed worth mentioning given it goes unchanged since the previous version.
The battery on this thing is what we'd call decent -- it takes quite a while to get a full charge, and lasts about a week of regular use. Amazon says you'll squeeze two weeks out of it with the wireless off, and while we didn't put that to the test, we found the battery life was, as expected, far better with the wireless turned off. You're not going to get the same type of battery life you see out of smaller devices, but for one of this type, it's pretty solid.
Wrap up





























Lots of buttons and lots of plastic. If you hate the iPhone aesthetic, you should love this.
@CRA1G
With all due respect, it's still e-ink, and I'm still going to pass. Waiting on full color Pixel Qi or Moorestown displays.
@a dumb cat
Why the need for color? It's not like books are printed in different color ink.
@James Sonne
They're called text books and people who like to learn read them.
@rhimbu
aka students
@rhimbu You can make your own tablet with pixel Qi, but it will costs almost $600. i guess not too much more expensive.
Granted it will have a battery life of hours instead of days. I think someone is coming out with a tablet later this year with pixel Qi, but it is about $750.
@rhimbu Then buy the actual textbook. With all the information on a textbook, it would be very cramped on something like the Kindle, and colour displays for it won't be out for a while, I'm assuming. Boohoo :'c
@a dumb cat I'm a huge fan of reading text in colour. I mean...
@rhimbu
students like to learn? not many of them, based on my 30 years as a professor.
@rhimbu
What student ever reads a chemistry or biology book cover to cover? At most they use them as references and flip to a certain page, and at best they don't use them at all, instead referring directly to the instructor's hand-outs and powerpoint slides, which is what they should do.
Without color, this makes it useless for eMagazines. iPad is the best all around reader and easily worth the difference in cost IMHO.
@meshack
Problem with the iPad is it may as well be invisible in sunlight. Having both a Kindle 2 and an iPad I still prefer the Kindle for heavy ready by far. Not only does it work well in brightly lit areas, it's much more comfortable for reading blocks of text over long periods than the iPad's LCD. Plus, the Kindle kills it in battery life. However, if you're only a light reader I can certainly see the appeal of a multi-function device like the iPad.
@profgaylord Are you seriously a prof? Because you don't strike me as a mature adult, let alone a professor.
@profgaylord
That's nice. Why don't you make learning more fun? Encourage students to find solutions to problems in different ways?
@Lucas
That's like saying buy an actual file cabinet instead of using a database. It doesn't address portability, and accessibility which are obviously the major concerns. Also, a textbook isn't going to be cramped on the Kindle DX because the ebook version* is formatted for multiple screen sizes.
@CRA1G
am still going for this over the ipad because i dont want to burn my eyes because of a pretty bright retina display !!!
@a dumb cat
Now now... don't be aggressive with the guy... he has a point as not all the printed media is black and white. If you get an e-ink color display then you can go for a whole different media like magazines, comics and more. Most newspapers are now printed in color too.
Considering the highest use in paper is not printing books but magazines, you will help the planet way more by replacing all that by a color display.
@Lucas
hahaha... fool... textbooks are huge, bulky, and cost about 150 bucks each... they, in many ways, are the reason for the kindle's existence. we might need color... or an iPad.
@James Sonne I'd like color because I'd love to have a way to read magazines on a digital device.
I just think it's funny that my statement, which was neither for nor against the Kindle or the iPhone, was downranked purely for mentioning the iPhone (as I'm sure this one will be). And I say this as someone who is not an iFanboy.
It's odd to me that the Nook is able to keep up with the new displays Amazon is throwing into the Kindles via software update.
I actually like the Nook better due to it's second screen, but I've already bought tons of books through Kindle (Android app + netbook) so I'm not sure which e-reader to go with.
I think I want this one.
Thanks for the great review.
@JONNNathannn I thought about buying a nook, but decided to go with the new Kindle. The main deal breaker for me was that the nook costs $20 more ($10 in price difference, plus $10 tax), battery life (a few days, vs a month) and the fact that B&N is trying to sell itself.
@JonObea
The B&N iPhone app doesn't sync your reading progress either so if you go back and forth between your nook and the app then you're in for a world of hurt. Kindle syncing works as it should across all their apps and Kindle.
@JONNNathannn
"It's odd to me that the Nook is able to keep up with the new displays Amazon is throwing into the Kindles via software update."
The larger the screen, the slower the refresh. Therefore, the nook is still slower since it has a smaller screen.
There's a lot to like here, but...
The market is evolving beyond simple 'grey scale' e-ink displays, no matter how really nice they are.
@DaHarder
if you're hoping for a color display that will last 1+ weeks, keep hoping. The E-ink display is what makes this device viable as an e-book reader
@gx1400
As an avid reader, and the owner of both a Kindle and a Nook, I appreciate what e-ink displays can accomplish, but Pixel IQ looks to offer the best of both world with very few compromises.
We'll See Soon Enough...
@DaHarder For a dedicated e-reader I see no need for a color display. I've never heard anyway say "That book was interesting, but, it would have been better if the print was in color."
Now for a tablet type device that happens to have an e-reader app, that's a different story.
@Edobe
That's certainly one 'position', but when companies are asking nearly US 400.00 for their e-readers, customer expectations of 'convergence' increase dramatically, and Amazon does little to thwart such notions when they actually integrate web-browsing capabilities in devices like the Kindle DX.
@Edobe
... as for your claim that no one feels, "That book was interesting, but, it would have been better if the print was in color.", all that does is that lead one to believe that you've never used you eReader to share a bedtime story with your child.
Note: Fairytale illustrations in grey-scale just don't cut it with a 3 year old - LOL!
@Edobe Perhaps not books, yes. But surely colour is seen as more important in newspaper/magazine content. Personally I do.
@DaHarder In fairness, this is precisely why these devices are no longer sold at that price.
There's a reason they still sell dedicated wristwatches and cameras despite the fact that our phones serve the same functions. Sometimes, doing something well is worth more than doing a lot of things poorly.
@DaHarder I agree with you on the price point, it is a bit expensive for what it is. However, even though it has an experimental browser this is still a dedicated e-reader. For a color experience though I'm sure it won't be long before a tablet with a pixel qi display comes out and you will be able to get a kindle app for it.
@DaHarder
"but Pixel IQ looks to offer the best of both world with very few compromises."
Personally, I think the Pixel QI is a let down in terms of e-readers. Did you see that Engadget review a couple of weeks ago where the installed it in a netbook? At one point in the video they put it next to a cheap e-reader and the e-reader was vastly superior in clarity (they were outside). That sort of killed my excitement about Pixel QI being an good replacement for E-ink.
@DaHarder
I love the e-ink display on my Kindle 2. I'm not sure what you mean by the market is "evolving beyond" the tech.
@greyseal Um, wristwatch sales have plummeted with the rise of cell phones, and I'd say after one (or maybe two) more generation of phone camera improvements, the point-and-shoot end of the camera market will meet a similar fate.
I wish, It was in the $199 price range.
@dontbecreepy I wish it was on the range! ... Damn! I wish everything was free! >_>
I'm a paperback reader and the DX is, in my opinion both too large and too expensive.
@gx1400 Fortunately, the new smaller Kindle seems to have the same screen technology, and is waaay cheaper than the DX. The first batch of them supposedly ship around the 31st of this month.
@gx1400
I've never understood the point of the DX. I can see it for textbooks, but until e-ink catches up with color and a touchscreen, I can't imagine wanting a textbook in this format.
I love the new Kindle. I have a white Kindle 2 that I have no intention of upgrading (and I adore it), but that new graphite one makes me jealous.
This + Wacom Annotation would be a nice PDF Reader. That is, as long as those annotations save to the PDF, preferably as some kind of note feature, but I don't know if PDFs have this.
Yeah the DX should be sold at $199. The 6-incher should be at $99 (Wifi) and $129 (3G)
@kornfan Agreed
@kornfan Nah, they should be £1, £2, and £3 respectively.
Do you really think the prices are set arbitrarily?
@kornfan And we should decrease the salaries, and increase the hours of those pesky sweat shop workers. Bathroom breaks? Forget about it! Americans need dirt cheap electronics, and we can't have those slaves getting too many rights.
The Kindle has made our mob's weekend book burning sessions a complete disaster.
Its difficult to identify which Kindles are used for deviant literature requiring destruction, there are very few of them compared to the stacks we used to raid from each home, they don't burn easily, and even when you DO get them ignited you feel like passing out from the fumes.
Unacceptable.
@Ducman69 Can't you just tell amazon to forcibly remove the books from the device? It will provide a lot less pollution, and the ignorant apes that were reading those books won't even notice!
You'd be helping out the environment!
@Ducman69 http://xkcd.com/750/
I'm more impressed with the Kindle app than the reader - The last couple months I've been buying all my new books to use on multiple devices with the Kindle App - And that's what keeps be coming back to Amazon to buy more books. The reader is nice, but I have my phone with me more often and end up spending 2/3rds of my reading time with that. I really like the Kindle, but I'm not going to carry it around too.