http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's 3D gala: 65-inch UN65C8000, 50-inch PN50C490, and BD-C8000 eyes-on http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 3:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
That looks like a nice set. However I like a larger screen, but $6000 is way too much (for me). I'll settle for a polarized projector. Not for everybody, but projectors work for me.]]>Aug 11th 2010 4:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 5:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 5:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
its not like "all in your face" 3d, its more like looking out a window, like you can see how far away stuff is.

the only thing that really floats is the HUD]]>Aug 11th 2010 6:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
Well, I'm not in the market for a 3DTV at the moment, but the bottom line is that when I look at a Samsung LCD TV through shutter glasses, there's way too much ghosting of the image. For example, when you have the girl from Monsters Vs. Aliens sticking the gun out of the TV (or was it the alien overlord, I forget...), you see a faint image of the muzzle to the left and right of the "real" gun. On the other hand, I didn't notice any such problem with the Panasonic plasma TV. Bottom line, if I was going to jump on this iteration of the 3D bandwagon, I'd go plasma.

That being said, I'm kinda holding out for a TV that supports true 1080p120 output over DVI (and DisplayPort?) as well as the less-capable HDMI standard used by BluRay players and such, and which displays the 3D image using a glasses-free lenticular solution. If an IPS display can fit FullHD into less than 24 diagonal inches, there's no reason a lenticular display couldn't handle full, simultaneous resolution to both eyes at anything over, say, 46 diagonal inches.]]>Aug 11th 2010 10:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
well I use the rechargeable glasses and I dropped the sharpness down to 10 and that seemed to solve the ghosting problem.

I would have gone with the panasonic but I wasnt gonna spend alot of moola on my first 3dtv , because Im sure something better will be out next year.]]>Aug 11th 2010 11:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 3:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
Yeah, buying the DVD and BD version of every film you want makes a ton more sense...]]>Aug 11th 2010 3:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Downranked for stupidity ]]>Aug 11th 2010 4:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Imagine if VHS quality was portable, and then the portable DVD player came along. You would be saying that DVDs are overkill in a portable device and should be confined to home theaters.

Things change over time. Advances in technology.]]>Aug 11th 2010 4:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 12th 2010 8:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
It's simple to answer your question: iPhone 4.

The display on the iPhone 4 is a crazy 200 to 300 dpi. And you can see the difference, though it is more subtle than blatant. I compared my 3GS to the 4, and I could very much tell the 4 had a better screen.

So, in short, the answer is "yes" you can see the difference. If you throw the image onto a 100'' screen with 7.2 THX surround, yeah that's a better experience! But that doesn't eliminate the legitimacy of increased resolution on a portable platform.

-Pie]]>Aug 12th 2010 4:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
cuz the one on my captivate doesnt. ]]>Aug 11th 2010 3:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 4:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/
And the iPad killer gets a "oh, by the way..."
]]>Aug 11th 2010 4:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasstron
not as cool as you think, although they are more than 10 years old now. an updated version might be neat]]>Aug 11th 2010 6:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 4:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 11th 2010 4:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/samsungs-3d-gala-65-inch-un65c8000-50-inch-pn50c490-and-bd-c/Aug 12th 2010 11:26AM