When it comes to forecasting the next big thing, we turn to our secret weapon: the TUAW braintrust. We put the question to you and let you have your go at it. Today's topic is the Mac Pro. As Apple moves briskly towards the post-PC future, does the tower Mac make the trip?
We've covered the Mac Pro before in the Pundit series, but the question is really on the table now. This month, the server-class versions of the Sandy Bridge processors the hypothetical Mac Pro refresh depends on began shipping from Intel.
With the multiprocessor Sandy Bridge/Xeon E5 chips hitting the market, Apple has a choice to make: revise the draft horse of its computer lineup, or put it gracefully out to pasture. (Not for nothing, those are some really expensive CPUs; the next iterations of Mac Pros, should they come to pass, will undoubtedly continue to carry premium price tags.)
With well-equipped iMacs taking on some of the roles in business that Pros used to occupy, is it time for Apple to end-of-life its power machine? Is the Thunderbolt port a fair substitute for a full rack of slots and GPU options? Or are there still enough seats in animation, video production, scientific computing and high-end graphic design (where every cycle makes a difference and time is money) to keep the Mac Pro on the product list for another few years?
You tell us. Place your vote in this poll and then join in the comments with all your insight.
|No way. There are many many roles which only the Mac Pro can fill unless Apple starts licensing OS X to Alienware or HP. Expect a refresh soon.||3849 (58.4%)|
|Yes way. The Pro had its day. Apple is moving firmly into the consumer field now.||586 (8.9%)|
|Possibly but why hasn't Apple updated it? Yearly updates on all their other hardware. I think the line is troubled, but I'm not sure which way it will go.||1681 (25.5%)|
|I want candy.||403 (6.1%)|
|Something else, I'll tell you in the comments.||75 (1.1%)|