<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Motorola inks deal with Kodak for camphone products</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/06/motorola-inks-deal-with-kodak-for-camphone-products/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Motorola inks deal with Kodak for camphone products</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola inks deal with Kodak for camphone products]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/06/motorola-inks-deal-with-kodak-for-camphone-products/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/06/motorola-inks-deal-with-kodak-for-camphone-products/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have yet to see a photo from a Motorola camera phone that was at a quality that you could print.  Perhaps Motorola should just focus on building quality phones.  I'm on my 3rd v551 and my wife went through 3 v551's and is now on her 3rd V3.  All replaced via warranty exchange because they build crap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2006 9:36AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>