You know... Everyone keeps saying Microsoft should have put an internal HD DVD drive since the start. I actually think other wise. Not putting HD DVD drive is one of the many reasons the 360 is much more successful than the PS3. I find it pretty obvious why MS didn't bother putting an internal HD DVD drive. Putting a HD DVD/Blu ray drive adds so much more cost to the console, not to mention delaying it getting into the market as we have seen with the PS3. This is why the PS3 isn't so successful; it's late and expensive. This is why the 360 is much more successful; it's early and cheaper.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
You know... Everyone keeps saying Microsoft should have put an internal HD DVD drive since the start. I actually think other wise. Not putting HD DVD drive is one of the many reasons the 360 is much more successful than the PS3. I find it pretty obvious why MS didn't bother putting an internal HD DVD drive. Putting a HD DVD/Blu ray drive adds so much more cost to the console, not to mention delaying it getting into the market as we have seen with the PS3. This is why the PS3 isn't so successful; it's late and expensive. This is why the 360 is much more successful; it's early and cheaper.