<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA["Kodak's 7.6-inch OLED WiFi digiframe now $200" would have made my day. "Cheaper" ruined it all.<br>I wonder if people at Kodak think they'll sell many for this much money....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 2:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[still expensive]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[silverblackvoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[2nd comment!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are they serious about that huge Kodak logo on top? Do they really think I want to watch my family pictures "presented by Kodak"? Picture frames should be text free, and most certainly brand name free....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 3:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like the logo may be illuminated like the control buttons along the perimeter and therefore may only be illuminated during menu operations.  My guess is that it is normally off during evryday photo-frame duties.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Pennington]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Half a meh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 4:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[For $800 it better have usb ports and a Playstation 3 built into the back of it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MarZau]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 6:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[In the article it post it says $150 cheaper, and the title says $200 cheaper.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[conor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why has it got glowing KODAK name on it? It's a photo frame. It should concetrate our attention on a photo and not the maker brand. If KODAK wants to advertise using photoframes maybe THEY should pay US.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why's the title say $200 but the story say $150. Why can't the editor keep it the same?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TRB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/10/kodaks-7-6-inch-oled-wifi-digiframe-now-200-cheaper/</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the source for this post? I spoke with Kodak and they said they were not dropping the price. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2009 12:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>