Are Android tablets just not as cool as iPads?
The design for three Galaxy tablets doesn’t infringe Apple’s registered design, Judge Colin Birss said today in London in a court fight between the world’s two biggest makers of smartphones. Consumers aren’t likely to get the tablet computers mixed up, he said.
The Galaxy tablets “do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design,” Birss said. “They are not as cool.”
While the judge's ruling may mean that Samsung will soon be able to start selling the Tabs in the UK, it highlights a real marketplace challenge for all Android tablets. They simply aren't considered as cool, stylish or fashionable as iPads, and that perception has kept them from gaining market share.
Perhaps it's no accident that the best-selling Android tablet to date, the Kindle Fire, succeeded not by trying to be cool, but by deeply undercutting the iPad on price, and by tying itself closely to Amazon's content ecosystem. After all, Judge Birss may just be right: No company really has competed successfully with Apple on the cool factor, and Android tablet-makers need to find other, more quotidian ways to compete.
What do you think?
Though yeah, maybe Android tablets aren't as cool as the iPad. But as the more iconic, famous product, there's always going to be a cachet and status associated with owning one. And I don't feel that "icon" is the point of any Android device. Android devices are there to be affordable and accessible, and that's what Samsung needs to focus on - just getting them out there so they become the norm.
This post has been removed.