Has the term "Smart Phone" run its course?
Take a look around a restaurant or a store, and you will see a significant percentage of the people there with their eyes glued to their phones. Are they dialing a number or checking their contact list? Are they changing their ringtone or their background? Chances are, they're not. Applications like Instagram and Pinterest seem to dominate most users' smart phone usage, while others are likely to be playing games like Draw Something or Words With Friends.
In fact, the phone part of most smart phones seems to have taken a back seat to other apps centered around entertainment and social networking. And this is not a bad thing. Still, etymologically speaking, an interesting question has been formed: Is the term "smart phone" still an accurate description of these devices? Certainly the term worked when they first debuted, because they were simply phones with some added features. But as the technology progressed, these products became more "smart" and much less "phone." Other products with similar functionality (tablets,etc.) do not have such categorizing names, and therefore avoid this troublesome linguistic question.
So, what do you all think? Is the term "smart phone" outdated? And, if so, what should these devices be called? Are they nothing more than remakes of the old personal digital assistants (PDA's), or have they gone even beyond that? Perhaps a new product category is needed...
Instead of taking "phone" out of smart phone, I think it'll be more accurate to redefine "phone" to include any device that's primary task is to communicate. After all, even dumb phones and feature phones are being used less and less as phones in the traditional sense. Most people I know, apart from HR folks, almost text exclusively.
As for your question of whether we should still call them phones since we don't really use them for phones: again, that doesn't apply to everyone. Younger generations have gone to texting, but there's still plenty of people who actually use phones, especially people doing business, for example. Texting is weird and informal in business situations.
Besides, why the rush? Just call them smartphones. It's only two syllables. Besides, what would YOU call them? If you call them tablets, you still have the same number of syllables (though fewer letters), but now you have added confusion because you're lumping two vastly different products (due to use cases) into the same category.
Because that's the thing of it. "Smartphone" is unique, easy to say and buzzy. As a word, it sticks in peoples minds because it is a new and unique construction. It will need to be replaced by something equally new, unique and "buzzy". An acronym from an engineering office isn't going to catch the imagination to supplant it.
The concept behind the smartphone has shifted a lot since the word first came up and it will continue to shift as technology changes and our interpretation and use of the technology shifts. The word 'smartphone' doesn't call to mind the same things now than it did 5 years ago. The devices and uses are very different, but because a better word hasn't arisen, the old word has moved with the concept.
Phones became smart when it can suddenly do more than just be mobile and be able to receive/make calls.
As some of you may know, the Samsung Galaxy Note (and II) has introduced to us a new (and perhaps a grotesque) term: the Phablet.
Does anyone really want to call their smartphone a 'phablet'..?
This post has been removed.
7 users following this discussion:
This discussion has been viewed 4359 times.
Last activity .