I know it's super early on and we can look forward to a full year's worth of refinement before this is going to be released as a consumer product, but is this thing going to work? Will people really buy into Google's vision that you can run a computer with absolutely nothing other than a network connection and a single browser?
Wow! What a brasen land-grab. Ok, for you youngins. Back in the 70's a new economic term was created for Japan's marketing scheem to steal electronics manufacturing from the US and many other countries. Worked quite well! It was called "Dumping". The idea was sell to the investers that you were going to manufacture at a loss for 2-3years but the result was in 2-3 years the competition would go bankrupt and leave you in control of the industry. This is a "Cloud Dumping" idea which, I must admit is well planned but illconceived. I am curious just how popular we are going to make it? It could be with time... I wont have a choice and have to adopt the Google world but in the meantime I am keenly vigilant about how Google is going to handle the comprimises. I have a gut feeling that addressbooks and China hackers aren't it's only problems and we will never learn more until they have sunk their hooks into enough people to (to coin a phrase) become "too big to fail". My how the early adopters are going to pay in the meantime. I think I will see if I can sandbox it on my OpenVMS... just to see what they are up to. Probably just a simple "too big to fail" marketing scheem, in which case I will just wish them well.
can anyone help with my problem, it is as follows system specs:2.19ghz AMD athlon xp3200+ 704mb ram w/windowsxp pro sp2 !
using virtual box setup the same way as on win7 machine all i get is a login screen then logging in then a blue screen nothing else just sits there on blue screen never moves, the os works fine on my win7 machine, and would like to run on desktop with specs listed above please help!!!
I installed it on on USB for my Acer Aspire One. It works great and I like it. It is quick, simple and very small. Only problems so far are that there is no shut down button...must power off the netbook. Also, the touchpad doesn't work.
I think it's a great initiative of Google making an OS. But what I would like to know, i have experienced
Splashtop (provided by Asus (basic applications CD), instant access to internet after pressing powerbutton but not to your harddrive (i am actually wondering, if anyone here heard of it)), isn't Google OS just that but than smarter/more advanced? Or will you still have access to your data (explorer?) ?
I would like to recommend that you at least install Splashtop and have looked at it, when you are testing Google OS, I really get the idea that that is where google is looking at. And Splashtop is quit usefull anyway...
I use it when for example when I am in a rush, and quikly want to know for example if there are any changes in my timetable for school or when I want to know which bus I have to take or where. It is actually quit similar to browser Chrome but than instant after powerbutton (!!!). I also wonder why google hasn't been able to do just the same..........
Most of the time I am using a computer (desktop or laptop) it is online or at least has Internet available if i want it.
I believe this OS will resonate with the average user, but only if a few things are dealt with:
1) price. in the end, Google wants to get a lot of people using this. it will have to be very very cheap.
2) security. the security needs to prevent the user from infecting themselves and from deleting system critical files.
3) local storage / offline use: users need to be able to compose offline Gmail and documents and save them to a usb or other local storage device.
4) cheap cloud storage
i wish them luck! when can i pre-order my Chrome netbook?!
IMHO the popularity of the ChromeOS download is because of one thing: brand name. What's actually behind it? Extremely simplified Ubuntu Karmic kernel and its graphic subsystem, completed with a Chrome browser modification. That's great, yeh? But who said that we can't remaster any existing distribution (e.g. Karmic itself) and do the same by ourselves? What's actually new in the idea of web-based operating system? Google aren't first with this idea, they're not last too. The only savior for them is netbooks and thin clients OEM-supply. That is what they're looking forward to. That's true Microsoft way :) But those who prefer Unix-way will replace it with more sophisticated distributions that nevertheless will remain as simple as Chrome.
I'm not interested in running Chrome OS on my netbook. I could care less about fast boot times or a mild boost in battery life. Installing Windows 7 or OSX gives me much more functionality. The only two devices I would be interested in installed Chrome OS on are my TV and a tablet.
The majority of internet users will just love it. 20 years ago a computer user was most probably a programmer too. Things have changed since then. Now everyone has a computer and most average users need a simple stable operating system with low hardware requirements. For them chrome os is the way. :)
Just downloaded the chrome-os-0.4.22.8-bootable-usb zip file and started playing with it.
From package_list_installed.txt file we can see many references to ubuntu deb packages installed, so perhaps we can say that chrome-os is ubuntu based.
On my ubuntu desktop i can simply mount the rootfs.image and start running the applications that are on that image (chrome browser for example... :))
My humble opinion is that a lightweight linux based operating system will take away the need for a antivirus/antispyware/antirootkit (and so on...) and let the cpu free of that load to run smoothly the web browser.
This is the future and as far as i am concerned, it is most welcome. :)
Cannot change screen resolution. Don't see a power button for proper shutdown. Normaly blocks after ~5 Minutes of working. But I can see a huge potential. Especially the cloud is great implemented. It's what I will see more in future from any vendor.
Envisage a future where you don't need a file manager or start menu to find your applications, files or folders, because everything is in the cloud. That future is here.
Sure, if you want to zap some alien dudes in "Half Life 4: Now they want to eat your lab-coat" then you might need to keep a dedicated machine to game on, but for composing, editing, viewing, surfing, listening, etc all we need is a browser.
Google need to hurry up and get this to the OEM market. It seriously threatens Microsoft's crown, and the strength of the Google brand may tempt more users to open source software.
If you want a fully functioning OS for your netbook straight away try Ubuntu 9.10 NBR. You can even install the Chromium browser and pretend you are running the Google OS if you want.
I compiled and ran it in VM Ware and couldn't really understand what it's all about. The current builds available to the public are pretty far behind what Google showed earlier this week. It really is just a browser... it doesn't even have an on/off button!
I commend the effort, but as someone said earlier, Chrome is a little early to the party, but that just means it's up to Chrome to get the party started. Full-fledged cloud computing is still a good 5 or 10 years down the road if you ask me. The cloud simply isn't hefty enough at this point. But this is an effort to innovate and I respect that.
I was really excited to try it out, but I found myself bored of it after a few minutes. It's essentially like trying out Google Chrome on a Mac, without the fixed tabs. Of course, I realize that it will grow over the next year, but really, how much room is there for growth from here? Although this is a fairly rough build, what we are looking at is a foundation for an OS that is unlikely to change. In the end, I think Chrome OS will find some degree of success, but not as much as Android. Where Android took some time to catch on, I think Google will expect the same from Chrome OS, but I believe they will be disappointed. At this point, I can't really see many people using this. Maybe it will find success in internet cafes? Honestly, I don't really know what to make of it at this point.
Seems like a scheme cooked up by a company that makes money when you're on the web (and makes nothing when you aren't) and hardware manufacturers who want to make sure netbooks remain secondary systems. People keep throwing out that '90 percent of the time in the browser,' but are you ready to give up the other ten percent for no reason at all?
As expected the OS is Linux Kernel with Google Chrome and little else. With lots of data now living in 'the cloud' many usual functions should be achievable.
One thing that puzzled me was how to move content from one web app to another - especially if it was not a google app. It turns out that Chromium has a download folder so I was able to log into dropbox, download a word file and the upload to google docs.
For a permanently connected device (desktop, settop box, TV?) Chromium could work very well. For mobile / netbook use I think some way to edit documents / download pics from camera when no connection is available is essential.
Images here: jonv.posterous.com/google-chromium-os-pics
Franchement c'est nul cet OS. Autant jute exécuter des applications web dans Chome ou dans un autre navigateur et ce, sur windows, mac os ou linux. Franchement sans intérêt. Déjà Andoid était vraiment pas extraordinaire, là c'est franchement inutile en l'état.
This is unusable if you can't change the resolution. I'm actually posting this message within Google OS. It seems that the default resolution is 640X480 16bit color. Not good. I also don't see anyway to power down or shut off. Oh well... I'll just suspend the session until someone figures out the details.
Seems like it's exactly as they described. I feel like it could catch on with netbooks but I feel like the people that buy them might not REALLY know what they are getting into. I feel like they will look for something like solitaire and be confused when they realize fully that it is 100% browser. They might be disappointed that they can't download programs like the want or do the same things they did with their old OS in the same way. Things like importing and storing images/music will be done differently and I feel like it might confuse a lot of people.
All that said, I think I could have a netbook running this. If they optimize it as well as they say they can, I'm hoping for fantastic battery life. I could easily use this on a netbook for the whole day if I'm out and about and don't have any design work that needs to get done.
It will be really hard to judge until we start seeing the offline implementation and the apps.
With Google's slew of free online software, they are indeed well on their way of taking over the market. If they do this right and improve on their existing products to integrate better with the OS (Picasa, Calendar, Wave, Docs), it could quite possibly be the next greatest mobile platform. No one expects this to replace Windows or OS X for desktop computing, and I am sure that professionals in various fields will not take a second glance at this OS unless their specific software needs are met (which I highly doubt).
There is only one major drawback I can see with Chrome OS (and cloud computing in general). WiFi is, unfortunately, not available everywhere, and not all of the available WiFi connections are free or accessible by everyone. In the U.S., 3G coverage is sorely lacking in many parts, and cell phone tethering is an expensive (or, in the case of the iPhone, nonexistent) option.
Google can do many things right, but I think this OS is a little too early to the party. Here's hoping that Google's OS will enjoy success and bring about many changes to the existing mobile broadband solutions.
I suppose if all you ever do is Gmail and browse web pages it might be okay, but it seems to me the whole internet-only "netbook" idea never caught on. It turns out people actually want inexpensive netbook-sized real computers that run Windows. Well over 90% of the people, that is.
To me, Chrome OS sounds a lot like Web TV; good for newbies and extremely limited... like a toaster. I think people will realize its limitations just like they realized the limitations of Linux on netbooks... as soon as they try to do anything more advanced. By the time this comes out, there will be plenty of high-power, inexpensive, light-weight, mini-PCs running full Windows 7 and I see little reason to get such a limited Google thin client that requires constant network access.
What a great analogy comparing it to WebTV! I had forgotten about this. All hype and then splat!
Personally I think they should've gone with and focused on the Android platform, then sold it as a buy once model, see your same app work on your phone and your Android OS desktop. There would be more synergy that way.
The only way I see this working is if TV Manufacturers begin to put this into TV's and not netbooks.