Discussion about
minceyfresh

What would you rather have: A longer zoom or wider aperture?

I ask this because I've noticed that it's become a trend on the F-series to have f/3.3 as their widest aperture (it's even shrunken to f/3.5 on the F300EXR). Fujifilm seems to sacrifice a wide aperture for some pretty insane optical zooms. While I admit that I have captured some pretty wild cloud/sunset shots thanks to the 10x zoom on my F72EXR, I actually really miss having the wide f/2.8 aperture compliment the natural light mode from my trusty old F10.

Honestly, I find myself in more situations where a wide aperture in low light is needed than I do where I need a loooooong zoom.

I was browsing reviews of the Canon Powershot S95, and users seem to gush over how amazing its low light photos are, which I'm pretty sure has a lot to do with the combination of the 1/1.7" sensor and the huge f/2.0 aperture. I haven't heard a peep about the fact that it "only" has a 3.8x optical zoom.

That's when I got to thinking: If Fujifilm released, say, a F400EXR, brought back their 1/1.6" sensor (which was last seen in the F200EXR), ditched the long zoom in favor for a f/2.0 aperture, they may very well end up with a camera that has the cult status that rivals the F30fd.

And for the users that make good use out of the long zooms and don't care about apertures? Maybe Fujifilm can keep innovating the long zoom/compact body technology with a follow-up to the F80EXR for them. :)

sort by

5 replies
dave

A lot of this is all personal preference, but that said, larger aperture! But I'm really partial to low light / available light photography (really dislike the way a flash can ruin an image if used incorrectly).

Also, I love wide angle photography and sometimes find the confines of a zoom too limiting (I'm rarely taking photos of things I need to zoom in on). This might be because I had a fixed lens on my SLR and DSLRs when I was first shooting on them. If I needed to get closer, I just walked!

Additionally, on my Canon S90, I rarely ever use the zoom feature. And yes, it definitely has a weak zoom compared to other point and shoot cameras. But it works perfectly for me!
3 like dislike
brandonpapworth

I agree with Dave on this one: larger aperture. This is both for the purpose of more light and more depth of field. Zoom may help you get those shots that are more distant, but having a larger aperture will give you way more flexibility when it comes to available light and how that'll affect your photo. I DO wish I had more zoom available on my Canon lens, but the f/2.0 really just makes up for it.
1 like dislike
minceyfresh

I'm glad to see that I wasn't the only one who felt that way! :)

I agree completely with everything you guys are saying, and I'm actually pretty surprised at how uncommon apertures at f/2.0 and larger are outside of top of the line point and shoots (most of which come close to the same price as an inexpensive DSLR).

Hmm, while writing that last paragraph, I got distracted and did some clicking around to discover that the SD4000IS has a f/2.0 aperture. Though the sensor is pretty dinky (1/2.3"), it *is* a backlit CMOS... I might have to read up on what people are saying about this one, what with it being only $269 on Amazon...
0 like dislike
minceyfresh

Ack, I was super excited yesterday to see the announcement of the Finepix F550 (and F500) EXR, only to be disappointed that Fujifilm again placed emphasis on zoom rather than a wide aperture! It's not as if they don't know the importance of a fast lens, considering they put a f/2 lens on their X100... Even their low end JV200 opens up to f/2.6! What gives, Fuji???
0 like dislike
whereismyjetpac

A larger aperture, not only for low light but for macros, and portraits!
1 like dislike

This post has been removed.

share:

4 users following this discussion:

  • brandonpapworth
  • dave
  • minceyfresh
  • whereismyjetpac

This discussion has been viewed 1680 times.
Last activity .