Did anyone else find it strange that it's only offered in japan but the family in the ad is Caucasian? Very odd...

So what was the war for then Andy?

Was it to find the weapons of mass destruction? Oops, haven't found those yet.

Maybe it was to free Iraq? Hmmm... last time I checked ethnic conflict wasn't rampant in free states I'm used to.

My point is that it's a failed war. Your arguments don't make sense because NONE of the pre war objectives have been met. Well, I guess we got Saddam. Make that 1 objective.

They are not "free minutes" because the service is $15/month.

love being waaaay out there...

David, why bother answering when you don't know what the fvck you're talking about. First, salts don't necessarily have to be sodium chloride. Second, when's the last time you saw sodium metal? If you have seen it you might recall it's stored in oil because when it comes into contact with water it reacts with it to form sodium hydroxide (strong base) and hydrogen gas (which catches fire in the exothermic reaction). I'd hardly call that "neutral" no matter how you're defining it.

This article is presented in a moronic way. Yes, YOU CAN USE WATER AS FUEL, but you have to first separate it into hydrogen and oxygen. That requires at best the same amount of energy put into it as you'd get out. In reality it takes more energy put in than you get out. Not such a bad thing if you're using solar, wind, or geothermal energy to do it but it's terrible if you use conventional fuels. This is just another way of getting hydrogen, but first we need to find clean ways of supplying power to get the hydrogen. Which begs the question, why don't we just use the energy directly and skip the hydrogen middle-man.

sir oinks-a-lot!

I like to be at the very end of the line.

my post is filed under 'H' for toy

Dog, help me get apples

I like being way back here. It's fun!

You all are way better than those amateurs over at gizmodo... what a bunch of chumps.

Oh, and Scott Borne is a douche (based on last week's macbreak weekly).