There is so much win in this.

Screw all you haters, don't get me down on my birthday, I'm celebrating the big 108!

This is madness.

Not to mention, they're ripping you off. You invented blue skin.

(hoo hoo)

Huh? Nintendo's one of the few companies that made the push for allowing you to play old games on new equipment. If this was abandonware, I can see people telling Nintendo to man up, but they already do make the older games available.

Remote Control

OH NOES! THEY DELETED COMMENTS FROM POOFREADERS!!!

Big whoop.

The only people that would get their panties in a bunch about that are the ones that feel smug about their red pens.

And anyways, it's spelled MINI not Mini.

:)

Matt.. It's Auto-CircleJerk-Blog... get it right.

Tourian... Well someone enjoyed my post, and that my friend, in itself is intrinsic value.

And I won't even ask for it back after 2 years, you should like that part of it.

It's a win-win situation.

"Ad hominem is when you attack the messenger instead of the message. Thus this is a class ad hominem attack."

One of the messengers was a fraud. People that supported the message knew one of the messengers knew that they were a fraud. The message needs to be taken back and re-evaulated. Frauds are not known by how much truth they speak.

"Upon what evidence do you base your claim that the report was NOT reviewed?"

Ok, upon what evidence do you base your claim that the report WAS reviewed after the fraudulent nature of one of the writers (and who's LYING was KNOWN by the people that made changes based on the report, in part written by a LIAR)?

It boils down to this... Anyone know knew that the person was a fraud, should lose their jobs. Any laws based on ANY research that this fraud was involved in, should be temporarily halted while an independent party(or parties) review the findings.

If the science is still good, then the laws would stand.
If the science was bad, the laws need to be repealed.

If you are so confident that you are correct, having a second set of eyes that were not tainted by working closely with a liar would be a good thing, as it would remove any doubts that the reports were not tainted.

What's the old saying, measure twice, and cut once?