Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I love my little computing companion but I often find myself missing a full sized keyboard. I have been looking at several of these portable and flexible keyboards, but I can't seem to make up my mind about which I should buy. I don't want the keyboard to be overly expensive, but I want it to be good quality. Also, how difficult is it to type on these keyboards? Thanks!"
Give me a break, "butchered"? NeXT took the advantages of BSD and meld it with the best desktop environment of its day. When Apple bought it, they enhanced on the ease of use of the desktop environment even more. Want a list of things Apple brought to BSD? Like .. QuickTime, Time Machine (version control), OpenCL, Grand Central Dispatch .. etc.
These are just the more fundamental things, the last 2 mentioned were made open source as well as their Mach kernel, Darwin.
So please, don't be so ignorant, OS X and GNOME or KDE are not even in the same category. Operating System v.s. X Window Manager
I'm not saying OS X is better than Linux or Windows, but merely that Apple has spent significant resources on making OS X their own creation. No company should be able to essentially just rip off another company's intellectual property. You can argue about whether Apple should out license or even make OS X open source, but until they do, what Psystar is doing is not only illegal, but their justification is completely ridiculous.
That's like Hyundai buying a stock Mercedes engine and putting it into a Hyundai, then advertising the fact that Hyundais perform like Mercedes for 1/3 of the price and expect Mercedes to "compete fairly" on Hyundai's ground.